Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The phosphorus trihalides \(\left(\mathrm{PX}_{3}\right)\) show the following variation in the bond angle \(\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{X}: \mathrm{PF}_{3}, 96.3^{\circ} ; \mathrm{PCl}_{3}, 100.3^{\circ} ; \mathrm{PBr}_{3}\), \(101.0^{\circ} ; \mathrm{PI}_{3}, 102.0^{\circ} .\) The trend is generally attributed to the change in the electronegativity of the halogen. (a) Assuming that all electron domains are the same size, what value of the \(\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{X}\) angle is predicted by the VSEPR model? (b) What is the general trend in the \(\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{X}\) angle as the halide electronegativity increases? (c) Using the VSEPR model, explain the observed trend in \(\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{X}\) angle as the electronegativity of \(X\) changes. (d) Based on your answer to part (c), predict the structure of \(\mathrm{PBrCl}_{4}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The X-P-X bond angle in a perfect tetrahedral electron-domain geometry is predicted to be 109.5° by the VSEPR model. As the electronegativity of the halide (X) increases, the X-P-X bond angle decreases due to increased lone pair-bonding electron repulsion. For PBrCl₄, the VSEPR model predicts a trigonal bipyramidal geometry with axial P-Cl bond angle of 180° and equatorial P-Br bond angles of approximately 120°.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Calculating the X-P-X angle using VSEPR model

For phosphorus trihalides (PX₃), the phosphorus (P) is the central atom, and the halides (X) surround it. The electron-domain geometry can be predicted using the VSEPR model. Here, phosphorus has 5 valence electrons and each halide X contributes one electron. The VSEPR model predicts a tetrahedral electron-domain geometry based on the sum of bonding pairs and lone pairs around the central atom. In PX₃ compounds, there are three bonding pairs (formed between the central atom P and halide atoms X) and one lone pair (on the central atom P). The VSEPR model predicts the X-P-X bond angle in a perfect tetrahedral electron-domain geometry to be 109.5°.
02

(b) General trend in the X-P-X angle with increasing halide electronegativity

As the electronegativity of the halide (X) increases, the X-P-X bond angle decreases. For example, the bond angle in PF₃ (96.3°) is smaller than that in PCl₃ (100.3°) and PBr₃ (101.0°). The trend continues (although less markedly) as we move from PBr₃ to PI₃ (102.0°).
03

(c) Using the VSEPR model to explain the observed trend in the X-P-X angle

The VSEPR model explains the observed trend in the X-P-X bond angle in phosphorus trihalides as a result of the interaction between lone pair electrons on the central phosphorus atom and bonding electrons. As the electronegativity of the halide (X) increases, the bonding electrons are drawn closer to the more electronegative halide atom. With the bonding electrons being closer to the halide atom (X), the repulsion between the lone pair and the bonding electrons on the central phosphorus (P) atom increases. Consequently, the central atom's lone pair pushes the bonding electron pairs slightly closer together. As a result, the X-P-X bond angle becomes smaller.
04

(d) Predicting the structure of PBrCl₄

PBrCl₄ is an exception as it contains four surrounding atoms. The phosphorus (P) is the central atom with three bromine (Br) atoms and one chlorine (Cl) atom surrounding it. Again, phosphorus has 5 valence electrons, with the three bromine atoms and the chlorine atom contributing one electron each. The VSEPR model predicts a trigonal bipyramidal electron-domain geometry for PBrCl₄ based on the five bonding pairs (formed between the central atom P and the surrounding atoms). There won't be any lone pair on the central atom P. Since the chlorine atom is more electronegative than the bromine atoms, it will take the axial position (due to its stronger repulsion with the equatorial atoms), while the bromine atoms occupy the equatorial plane. The axial P-Cl bond angle will be 180°, and the equatorial P-Br bond angles should be approximately 120°.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Phosphorus Trihalides Explained
Phosphorus trihalides \(PX_3\) are chemical compounds in which a central phosphorus atom is bonded to three halogen atoms. These halogens can be fluorine (F), chlorine (Cl), bromine (Br), or iodine (I).
Phosphorus trihalides are recognized by their systematic structure, where phosphorus contributes five valence electrons, and each halogen adds one. This results in a total of eight electrons shared between phosphorus and the halogens, forming three covalent bonds.
The remaining electron pair on phosphorus forms a lone pair, which influences the molecule’s geometry significantly.
These compounds are interesting due to their varied applications and their specific geometric formation.
Electronegativity Trends and Their Impact
Electronegativity refers to the ability of an atom to attract shared electrons in a covalent bond. In the context of phosphorus trihalides:
  • Fluorine, being highly electronegative, attracts bonding electrons more strongly than other halogens.
  • As we progress down the halogen group from F to I, electronegativity decreases.
This electronegativity difference leads to varied bond angles among different trihalides.
For instance, in \(PF_3\), where fluorine is highly electronegative, the \(X-P-X\) bond angle is smallest at approximately 96.3°, compared to the wider angles in other trihalides.
Understanding these trends helps predict changes in molecular structure and reactivity.
Predicting Molecular Geometry with VSEPR
The Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) model is a tool used to predict the geometric arrangement of atoms in a molecule. For phosphorus trihalides, the VSEPR model helps explain their pyramidal shape.
With three bonding pairs and one lone pair around the phosphorus atom, the predicted geometry is a trigonal pyramid, fitting the electron-domain geometry of a tetrahedral.
This shape arises because electron pairs, whether bonding or lone pairs, repel each other and try to stay as far apart as possible.
The VSEPR model predicts a bond angle of 109.5° for a perfect tetrahedral geometry. However, the presence of a lone pair slightly squeezes the other bonds together, reducing the actual \(X-P-X\) bond angle.
Understanding Bond Angles in Phosphorus Trihalides
Bond angles in phosphorus trihalides are influenced by both the lone pair of electrons on phosphorus and the electronegativity of the halogens.
The presence of the phosphorus lone pair creates additional repulsion, reducing the bond angles slightly compared to a perfect tetrahedral angle of 109.5°.
As electronegativity of the halogen increases, the bond pair electrons are pulled closer to the halogen, intensifying the repulsion from the lone pair on phosphorus.
This means higher electronegativity correlates with smaller \(X-P-X\) bond angles. For example, the slightly smaller bond angle in \(PF_3\) is attributed to fluorine's high electronegativity.
Understanding bond angles is crucial for predicting the geometry and behavior of molecules in chemical reactions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain the following: (a) The peroxide ion, \(\mathrm{O}_{2}^{2-}\), has a longer bond length than the superoxide ion, \(\mathrm{O}_{2}^{-}\). (b) The magnetic properties of \(\mathrm{B}_{2}\) are consistent with the \(\pi_{2 p}\) MOs being lower in energy than the \(\sigma_{2 p}\) MO. (c) The \(\mathrm{O}_{2}^{2+}\) ion has a stronger O \(-\) O bond than \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) itself.

(a) What does the term paramagnetism mean? (b) How can one determine experimentally whether a substance is paramagnetic? (c) Which of the following ions would you expect to be paramagnetic: \(\mathrm{O}_{2}^{+}, \mathrm{N}_{2}^{2-}, \mathrm{Li}_{2}^{+}, \mathrm{O}_{2}^{2-} ?\) For those ions that are paramagnetic, determine the number of unpaired electrons.

A compound composed of \(2.1 \% \mathrm{H}, 29.8 \% \mathrm{~N},\) and \(68.1 \% \mathrm{O}\) has a molar mass of approximately \(50 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{mol}\). (a) What is the molecular formula of the compound? (b) What is its Lewis structure if \(\mathrm{H}\) is bonded to \(\mathrm{O} ?\) (c) What is the geometry of the molecule? (d) What is the hybridization of the orbitals around the \(\mathrm{N}\) atom? (e) How many \(\sigma\) and how many \(\pi\) bonds are there in the molecule?

(a) Starting with the orbital diagram of a sulfur atom, describe the steps needed to construct hybrid orbitals appropriate to describe the bonding in \(\mathrm{SF}_{2}\). (b) What is the name given to the hybrid orbitals constructed in (a)? (c) Sketch the large lobes of these hybrid orbitals. (d) Would the hybridization scheme in part (a) be appropriate for \(\mathrm{SF}_{4} ?\) Explain.

Consider the Lewis structure for glycine, the simplest amino acid: (a) What are the approximate bond angles about each of the two carbon atoms, and what are the hybridizations of the orbitals on each of them? (b) What are the hybridizations of the orbitals on the two oxygens and the nitrogen atom, and what are the approximate bond angles at the nitrogen? (c) What is the total number of \(\sigma\) bonds in the entire molecule, and what is the total number of \(\pi\) bonds?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free