Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What properties make a substance a good coagulant for water purification?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A good coagulant for water purification should be effective in removing particles, have charge neutralization ability, require a low dosage, be safe for human consumption, cost-effective, compatible with other treatment processes, and have minimal environmental impact. Examples of good coagulants include aluminum sulfate, ferric chloride, and polyacrylamides. These coagulants are able to form larger particles (flocs) for easy removal, neutralize charges for particle aggregation, work efficiently in small amounts, and pose minimal risks to human health and the environment.

Step by step solution

01

1. Effectiveness in removing particles

A good coagulant must be able to effectively remove suspended and dissolved particles in water to ensure its clarity. The coagulant should be able to form flocs, or larger particles, which can easily be filtered out or settled.
02

2. Charge neutralization ability

Coagulants must have the ability to neutralize charges of suspended particles and dissolved contaminants. This helps the particles to aggregate and form flocs. Inorganic coagulants like aluminum and iron salts are commonly used due to their positive charge, which can neutralize the negative charge of particles.
03

3. Low required dosage

A good coagulant should work effectively in small amounts, reducing the amount of coagulant needed and the associated costs. This also minimizes the potential for residual chemicals in the treated water.
04

4. Safety for human consumption

The coagulant must be safe for human consumption, as it will be used to treat water for drinking purposes. This means it should not introduce harmful byproducts or chemicals into the water.
05

5. Cost-effectiveness

A good coagulant should be cost-effective for operators to purchase and use in water treatment plants. This includes considering not only the direct cost of the coagulant itself, but also the associated costs of storage, handling, and potential side-effects on other water treatment processes.
06

6. Compatibility with other treatment processes

A good coagulant should not interfere with other water treatment processes. It should work well in combination with other purification methods such as filtration, disinfection, and sedimentation.
07

7. Environmental impact

The coagulant should not have adverse effects on the environment, including aquatic life, when released as part of treated water discharge. This can be evaluated by considering the toxic effects, persistence, and biodegradability of the coagulant and any byproducts formed during the treatment process. Examples of good coagulants for water purification include aluminum sulfate (alum), ferric chloride, and polyacrylamides. These coagulants have proven to be effective and safe, while meeting many of the properties outlined above.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Coagulant Properties
When water from natural sources is treated for human consumption, it often contains suspended particles that need to be removed. Coagulants are unique substances that play a vital role in this process. Their properties determine the efficacy and efficiency of water purification. Coagulants must excel in the formation of flocs—clusters of coalesced particles that are large enough to be removed by filtration or sedimentation.

Effective coagulants share common properties: they have a strong attraction to particulate matter, enabling them to bind with the particles and pull them out of suspension. Furthermore, they must work in low dosages to prevent excessive chemical usage and cost, which also helps minimize the potential of introducing residual substances into the water supply. Optimal coagulants are those that balance cost with functionality, working effectively while remaining economical for water treatment facilities.
Charge Neutralization
Charge neutralization is a crucial aspect of the coagulation process. In raw water, many particles carry a negative charge, and this mutual repulsion keeps them from aggregating. To overcome this, coagulants, which typically have a positive charge, are added to the water. These charged coagulants can neutralize the negative charge of the particles, reducing repulsion and encouraging clumping.

Commonly used inorganic coagulants like aluminum and iron salts are particularly good at this because of their positively charged ions. By neutralizing the charge, the particles become destabilized and can aggregate into larger flocs. These flocs are then large enough to be removed by subsequent filtration or can settle out in a sedimentation tank. Coagulation followed by flocculation is the tandem process at the heart of this purification step, setting the stage for clearer and cleaner water.
Water Treatment Safety
Safety is a paramount concern in the selection and use of water treatment coagulants. These substances must be non-toxic and safe for human consumption, considering the water may eventually be used for drinking, cooking, or bathing. Coagulants must therefore not introduce harmful byproducts into the water. For instance, when using aluminum or iron salts, care must be taken so that the levels of these metals remain within the safe limits prescribed by health regulations.

Moreover, the byproducts formed during the coagulation process should also be non-harmful. This requirement extends to the operational safety for workers handling these coagulants, which involves proper storage, handling procedures, and equipment to protect from exposure. Thus, safety in water treatment encompasses both the end consumer and the operators within the treatment facilities.
Environmental Impact of Coagulants
Environmental considerations are increasingly central to the choice of coagulants used in water treatment. The ideal coagulant should have no adverse effects on the ecosystem when the treated water is discharged back into the environment. This includes being non-toxic to aquatic life and having minimal long-term environmental persistence. Biodegradable coagulants, which break down naturally without accumulating in the environment or causing harm to wildlife, are preferred.

Further, the impact of sludge produced by the coagulation process must be managed responsibly. Treatment plants must have strategies for the safe disposal or reuse of the residuals resulting from water purification. Good environmental practices in water treatment not only protect nature but also contribute to the sustainability and the long-term effectiveness of water treatment programs.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A reaction that contributes to the depletion of ozone in the stratosphere is the direct reaction of oxygen atoms with ozone: \(\mathrm{O}(g)+\mathrm{O}_{3}(g) \longrightarrow 2 \mathrm{O}_{2}(g)\) At \(298 \mathrm{~K}\) the rate constant for this reaction is \(4.8 \times 10^{5} \mathrm{M}^{-1} \mathrm{~s}^{-1}\). (a) Based on the units of the rate constant, write the likely rate law for this reaction. (b) Would you expect this reaction to occur via a single elementary process? Explain why or why not. (c) From the magnitude of the rate constant, would you expect the activation energy of this reaction to be large or small? Explain. (d) Use \(\Delta H_{f}^{\circ}\) values from Appendix \(\mathrm{C}\) to estimate the enthalpy change for this reaction. Would this reaction raise or lower the temperature of the stratosphere?

The estimated average concentration of \(\mathrm{NO}_{2}\) in air in the United States in 2006 was 0.016 ppm. (a) Calculate the partial pressure of the \(\mathrm{NO}_{2}\) in a sample of this air when the atmospheric pressure is 755 torr \((99.1 \mathrm{kPa})\). (b) How many molecules of \(\mathrm{NO}_{2}\) are present under these conditions at \(20{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) in a room that measures \(15 \times 14 \times 8 \mathrm{ft}\) ?

(a) What are trihalomethanes (THMs)? (b) Draw the Lewis structures of two example THMs.

The Ogallala aquifer is the largest in the United States, covering \(450,000 \mathrm{~km}^{2}\) across eight states, from South Dakota to Texas. This aquifer provides \(82 \%\) of the drinking water for the people who live in this region, although most \((>75 \%)\) of the water that is pumped from it is for irrigation. Irrigation withdrawals are approximately 18 billion gallons per day. (a) The Ogallala aquifer might run dry, according to some estimates, in 25 years. How many cubic kilometers of water would be withdrawn in a 25 -year period? (b) Explain the processes that would recharge the aquifer.

The dissociation energy of a carbon-bromine bond is typically about \(210 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{mol}\). (a) What is the maximum wavelength of photons that can cause \(\mathrm{C}-\mathrm{Br}\) bond dissociation? (b) Which kind of electromagnetic radiation-ultraviolet, visible, or infrared-does the wavelength you calculated in part (a) correspond to?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free