Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Determine the electron configurations for \(\mathrm{CN}^{+}, \mathrm{CN}\), and \(\mathrm{CN}^{-}\). (a) Which species has the strongest \(\mathrm{C}-\mathrm{N}\) bond? (b) Which species, if any, has unpaired electrons?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) The strongest C-N bond is present in CN⁺, as it has the least number of antibonding electrons (4) compared to CN (5) and CN⁻ (6). (b) Out of the three species, only CN has unpaired electrons, with one unpaired electron in the π*(2py) orbital. CN⁺ and CN⁻ have no unpaired electrons.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the total number of electrons for each ion

The number of electrons for each ion is determined by considering the atomic number of each element and their charge. Carbon (C) has 6 electrons and nitrogen (N) has 7 electrons. CN⁺: Carbon (6) + Nitrogen (7) - 1 (positive charge) = 12 electrons CN: Carbon (6) + Nitrogen (7) = 13 electrons CN⁻: Carbon (6) + Nitrogen (7) + 1 (negative charge) = 14 electrons
02

Determine the electron configuration using the molecular orbital theory

The molecular orbital theory uses atomic orbitals from the elements to create molecular orbitals. There are five molecular orbitals: σ(2s), σ*(2s), σ(2pz), π(2px), and π(2py). The order of these orbitals in terms of their energy is: σ(2s) < σ*(2s) < π(2px) = π(2py) < σ(2pz) Now, we fill these orbitals with the electrons of CN⁺, CN, and CN⁻ to find their electron configurations.
03

Electron configurations of CN⁺, CN, and CN⁻

Using the molecular orbitals, we fill the electrons from the lowest energy level up. CN⁺ (12 electrons): σ(2s)², σ*(2s)², π(2px)², π(2py)², σ(2pz)², π*(2px)² CN (13 electrons): σ(2s)², σ*(2s)², π(2px)², π(2py)², σ(2pz)², π*(2px)², π*(2py)¹ CN⁻ (14 electrons): σ(2s)², σ*(2s)², π(2px)², π(2py)², σ(2pz)², π*(2px)², π*(2py)²
04

Identify the species with the strongest C-N bond

The bond strength is determined by the difference between bonding and antibonding electrons. The fewer antibonding electrons and the greater bonding electrons, the stronger the bond. From the electron configurations: CN⁺: Bonding electrons = 8 (σ(2s)², π(2px)², π(2py)², σ(2pz)²) Antibonding electrons = 4 (σ*(2s)², π*(2px)²) CN: Bonding electrons = 8 (σ(2s)², π(2px)², π(2py)², σ(2pz)²) Antibonding electrons = 5 (σ*(2s)², π*(2px)², π*(2py)¹) CN⁻: Bonding electrons = 8 (σ(2s)², π(2px)², π(2py)², σ(2pz)²) Antibonding electrons = 6 (σ*(2s)², π*(2px)², π*(2py)²) Among the three species, CN⁺ has the strongest C-N bond as it has the least number of antibonding electrons.
05

Determine which species has unpaired electrons

The species with unpaired electrons should have an odd number of electrons in its antibonding orbitals. From the electron configurations: CN⁺: All electrons are paired (none unpaired) CN: One unpaired electron in the π*(2py) orbital CN⁻: All electrons are paired (none unpaired) Hence, the CN species has one unpaired electron.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For both atoms and molecules, ionization energies (Section 7.4) are related to the energies of orbitals: The lower the energy of the orbital, the greater the ionization energy. The first ionization energy of a molecule is therefore a measure of the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO). See the "Chemistry Put to Work" box on Orbitals and Energy. The first ionization energies of several diatomic molecules are given in electron-volts in the following table: \begin{tabular}{ll} \hline Molecule & \(I_{1}(\mathrm{eV})\) \\ \hline \(\mathrm{H}_{2}\) & \(15.4\) \\ \(\mathrm{~N}_{2}\) & \(15.6\) \\ \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) & \(12.1\) \\ \(\mathrm{~F}_{2}\) & \(15.7\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} (a) Convert these ionization energies to \(\mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol} .(\mathrm{b})\) On the same plot, graph \(I_{1}\) for the \(\mathrm{H}, \mathrm{N}, \mathrm{O}\), and \(\mathrm{F}\) atoms (Figure 7.11) and \(I_{1}\) for the molecules listed. (c) Do the ionization energies of the molecules follow the same periodic trends as the ionization energies of the atoms? (d) Use molecular orbital energy-level diagrams to explain the trends in the ionization energies of the molecules.

(a) What is the probability of finding an electron on the internuclear axis if the electron occupies a \(\pi\) molecular orbital? (b) For a homonuclear diatomic molecule, what similarities and differences are there between the \(\pi_{2 p}\) MO made from the \(2 p_{x}\) atomic orbitals and the \(\pi_{2 p}\) MO made from the \(2 p_{y}\) atomic orbitals? (c) Why are the \(\pi_{2 p}\) MOs lower in energy than the \(\pi_{2 p}^{*}\) MOs?

Predict the trend in the \(\mathrm{F}(\) axial \()-\mathrm{A}-\mathrm{F}\) (equatorial) bond angle in the following \(\mathrm{AF}_{n}\) molecules: \(\mathrm{PF}_{5}, \mathrm{SF}_{4}\) and \(\mathrm{ClF}_{3}\)

The molecules \(\mathrm{SiF}_{4}, \mathrm{SF}_{4}\), and \(\mathrm{XeF}_{4}\) have molecular formulas of the type \(\mathrm{AF}_{4}\), but the molecules have different molecular geometries. Predict the shape of each molecule, and explain why the shapes differ.

Consider the molecule \(\mathrm{PF}_{4} \mathrm{Cl}\). (a) Draw a Lewis structure for the molecule, and predict its electron-domain geometry. (b) Which would you expect to take up more space, a. \(\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{F}\) bond or a \(\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{Cl}\) bond? Explain. (c) Predict the molecular geometry of \(\mathrm{PF}_{4} \mathrm{Cl}\). How did your answer for part (b) influence your answer here in part (c)? (d) Would you expect the molecule to distort from its ideal electron-domain geometry? If so, how would it distort?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free