Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Predict the trend in the \(\mathrm{F}(\) axial \()-\mathrm{A}-\mathrm{F}\) (equatorial) bond angle in the following \(\mathrm{AF}_{n}\) molecules: \(\mathrm{PF}_{5}, \mathrm{SF}_{4}\) and \(\mathrm{ClF}_{3}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In the given molecules, PF5, SF4, and ClF3, the F(axial)-A-F(equatorial) bond angles are predicted as 90° for all three molecules using the VSEPR theory, as they have trigonal bipyramidal, see-saw, and T-shaped molecular geometries, respectively.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the number of valence electrons for each molecule

Before determining the electron domain geometry and the molecular geometry, let's find the number of valence electrons for each molecule. - For \(\mathrm{PF}_{5}\): P has 5 valence electrons and each F has 7 valence electrons, so the total is \(5 + (5 \times 7) = 40\) valence electrons. - For \(\mathrm{SF}_{4}\): S has 6 valence electrons and each F has 7 valence electrons, so the total is \(6 + (4 \times 7) = 34\) valence electrons. - For \(\mathrm{ClF}_{3}\): Cl has 7 valence electrons and each F has 7 valence electrons, so the total is \(7 + (3 \times 7) = 28\) valence electrons.
02

Determine the electron domain geometry and molecular geometry for each molecule

Now, we will use the VSEPR theory to find the electron domain geometry and molecular geometry for each molecule. - \(\mathrm{PF}_{5}\): With 5 bonding groups and no lone pairs, the electron domain geometry is trigonal bipyramid, and the molecular geometry is also trigonal bipyramid. - \(\mathrm{SF}_{4}\): With 4 bonding groups and 1 lone pair, the electron domain geometry is trigonal bipyramid, and the molecular geometry is "see-saw" or distorted tetrahedron. - \(\mathrm{ClF}_{3}\): With 3 bonding groups and 2 lone pairs, the electron domain geometry is trigonal bipyramid, and the molecular geometry is T-shaped.
03

Determine the F(axial)-A-F(equatorial) bond angles for each molecule

Now that we have the molecular geometry, we can predict the F(axial)-A-F(equatorial) bond angles in these molecules. - \(\mathrm{PF}_{5}\): In a trigonal bipyramid, the F(axial)-P-F(equatorial) bond angle is 90°. As there are no lone pairs causing distortion, this angle remains the same. - \(\mathrm{SF}_{4}\): In the see-saw geometry, the F(axial)-S-F(equatorial) bond angle is still 90° as the lone pair does not influence this angle. - \(\mathrm{ClF}_{3}\): In a T-shaped geometry, the F(axial)-Cl-F(equatorial) bond angle is 90° because the lone pairs force the bonds to remain perpendicular to each other. In conclusion, the F(axial)-A-F(equatorial) bond angles for all three molecules—PF5, SF4, and ClF3—are equal to 90°.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Electron Domain Geometry
Electron domain geometry plays a crucial role in understanding the shape and structure of molecules. It is determined by the arrangement of electron pairs around a central atom, including both bonding pairs that form bonds and lone pairs that do not participate in bonding.

This concept is best explained through the Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory, which suggests that electron pairs arrange themselves as far apart as possible to minimize repulsion between them. This results in specific geometric arrangements known as electron domain geometries. Common examples include:
  • Linear: With two electron domains, the angle is 180°.
  • Trigonal Planar: With three electron domains, the angle is 120°.
  • Tetrahedral: With four electron domains, the angle is 109.5°.
  • Trigonal Bipyramidal: With five electron domains, as in the mentioned \( ext{PF}_5\), the angles are 120° in the equatorial plane and 90° axial to equatorial.
  • Octahedral: With six electron domains, all angles are 90°.
Understanding the electron domain geometry is essential because it forms the foundation for determining the molecular geometry of a molecule.
Molecular Geometry
Once the electron domain geometry is established, we can delve into molecular geometry, which describes the actual shape of the molecule. Unlike electron domain geometry, molecular geometry considers only the positions of atoms, not the lone pairs.

The distinction becomes apparent in molecules like \( ext{SF}_4\) and \( ext{ClF}_3\). These molecules have lone pairs that distort the shape defined by their electron domain geometry:
  • Trigonal Bipyramidal with no lone pairs: Results in the same molecular geometry, as seen in \( ext{PF}_5\).
  • Trigonal Bipyramidal with one lone pair: The lone pair in \( ext{SF}_4\) forces a "see-saw" shape, differing from the original geometry.
  • Trigonal Bipyramidal with two lone pairs: As in \( ext{ClF}_3\), where the molecular shape is T-shaped due to the influence of two lone pairs.
The molecular geometry is significant for predicting how molecules will interact, affecting properties like polarity and reactivity.
Valence Electrons
Valence electrons are the outermost electrons of an atom and are pivotal in determining how atoms bond and form molecules. These electrons are involved in forming bonds, as they can be shared with other atoms, given away, or accepted to achieve a stable electron configuration.

To predict molecular behavior and geometry, calculating the total number of valence electrons in a molecule is the first step. For example:
  • Phosphorus in \( ext{PF}_5\) has 5 valence electrons, with each fluorine contributing 7, leading to 40 valence electrons for the molecule.
  • Sulfur in \( ext{SF}_4\) has 6 valence electrons, combining with four fluorines' 28 for a total of 34 valence electrons.
  • Chlorine in \( ext{ClF}_3\) brings 7 electrons, and three fluorines add 21, totaling 28 valence electrons.
The number and arrangement of valence electrons determine the electronic structure and ultimately the chemical properties and reactions of the molecule.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Describe the characteristic electron-domain geometry of each of the following numbers of electron domains about a central atom: (a) 3, (b) 4 , (c) 5, (d) 6

The \(\mathrm{PF}_{3}\) molecule has a dipole moment of \(1.03 \mathrm{D}\), but \(\mathrm{BF}_{3}\) has a dipole moment of zero. How can you explain the difference?

There are two compounds of the formula \(\mathrm{Pt}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{2} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\) : The compound on the right, cisplatin, is used in cancer therapy. The compound on the left, transplatin, is ineffective for cancer therapy. Both compounds have a square-planar geometry. (a) Which compound has a nonzero dipole moment? (b) The reason cisplatin is a good anticancer drug is that it binds tightly to DNA. Cancer cells are rapidly dividing, producing a lot of DNA. Consequently cisplatin kills cancer cells at a faster rate than normal cells. However, since normal cells also are making DNA, cisplatin also attacks healthy cells, which leads to unpleasant side effects. The way both molecules bind to DNA involves the \(\mathrm{Cl}^{-}\) ions leaving the Pt ion, to be replaced by two nitrogens in DNA. Draw a picture in which a long vertical line represents a piece of DNA. Draw the \(\mathrm{Pt}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{2}\) fragments of cisplatin and transplatin with the proper shape. Also draw them attaching to your DNA line. Can you explain from your drawing why the shape of the cisplatin causes it to bind to DNA more effectively than transplatin?

(a) Explain why the following ions have different bond angles: \(\mathrm{C} 1 \mathrm{O}_{2}^{-}\) and \(\mathrm{NO}_{2}^{-}\). Predict the bond angle in each case. (b) Explain why the \(\mathrm{XeF}_{2}\) molecule is linear and not bent.

(a) Draw Lewis structures for ethane \(\left(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{6}\right)\), ethylene \(\left(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{4}\right)\), and acetylene \(\left(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{2}\right)\). (b) What is the hybridization of the carbon atoms in each molecule? (c) Predict which molecules, if any, are planar. (d) How many \(\sigma\) and \(\pi\) bonds are there in each molecule? (e) Suppose that silicon could form molecules that are precisely the analogs of ethane, ethylene, and acetylene. How would you describe the bonding about \(S i\) in terms of hydrid orbitals? Does it make a difference that Si lies in the row below \(\mathrm{C}\) in the periodic table? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free