Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) Why is the fluorine present in chlorofluorocarbons not a major contributor to depletion of the ozone layer? (b) What are the chemical forms in which chlorine exists in the stratosphere following cleavage of the carbonchlorine bond?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Fluorine in CFCs does not contribute majorly to ozone layer depletion because it forms stable compounds in the stratosphere, preventing it from reacting with ozone. The carbon-fluorine bond is stronger and less reactive than the carbon-chlorine bond, making fluorine less likely to participate in destructive reactions with ozone. (b) After the cleavage of the carbon-chlorine bond in CFCs, the chemical forms of chlorine in the stratosphere are the reactive chlorine atom (Cl) and chlorine monoxide (ClO). These species participate in a reaction cycle responsible for the depletion of ozone.

Step by step solution

01

(a) The role of fluorine in chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and its contribution to ozone layer depletion

: Fluorine in CFCs does not contribute majorly to the ozone layer depletion primarily because it forms stable compounds with other elements in the stratosphere, which prevents it from reacting with ozone. When CFCs are broken down by ultraviolet (UV) radiation in the stratosphere, the carbon-fluorine bond is relatively stronger and less reactive than the carbon-chlorine bond, which makes it less likely to participate in destructive reactions with ozone. This means that fluorine is not a significant contributor to depletion of the ozone layer.
02

(b) Chemical forms of chlorine in the stratosphere after the cleavage of carbon-chlorine bond

: When the carbon-chlorine bond in CFCs is broken in the stratosphere by UV radiation, it forms reactive chlorine atoms (Cl). Reactive chlorine atoms can participate in the following reactions: 1. Chlorine atoms react with ozone to form chlorine monoxide (ClO) and molecular oxygen (O2): \[ Cl + O_3 \rightarrow ClO + O_2 \] 2. Chlorine monoxide (ClO) can further react with atomic oxygen (O) to create molecular oxygen (O2) and regenerate the chlorine atom (Cl): \[ ClO + O \rightarrow Cl + O_2 \] This cycle of reactions involving chlorine species is responsible for the depletion of ozone. So, after the cleavage of the carbon-chlorine bond, the chemical forms of chlorine in the stratosphere are the reactive chlorine atom (Cl) and chlorine monoxide (ClO).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Phosphorus is present in seawater to the extent of \(0.07 \mathrm{ppm}\) by mass. If the phosphorus is present as phosphate, \(\mathrm{PO}_{4}{ }^{3-}\), calculate the corresponding molar concentration of phosphate in seawater.

Gold is found in seawater at very low levels, about \(0.05\) ppb by mass. Assuming that gold is worth about \(\$ 800\) per troy ounce, how many liters of seawater would you have to process to obtain \(\$ 1,000,000\) worth of gold? Assume the density of seawater is \(1.03 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{mL}\) and that your gold recovery process is \(50 \%\) efficient

As of the writing of this text, EPA standards limit atmospheric ozone levels in urban environments to 84 ppb. How many moles of ozone would there be in the air above Los Angeles County (area about 4000 square miles; consider a height of \(10 \mathrm{~m}\) above the ground) if ozone was at this concentration?

The rate of solar energy striking Earth averages 169 watts per square meter. The rate of energy radiated from Earth's surface averages 390 watts per square meter. Comparing these numbers, one might expect that the planet would cool quickly, yet it does not. Why not?

The degradation of \(\mathrm{CF}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{~F}\) (an HFC) by OH radicals in the troposphere is first order in each reactant and has a rate constant of \(k=1.6 \times 10^{8} \mathrm{M}^{-1} \mathrm{~s}^{-1}\) at \(4^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). If the tropospheric concentrations of \(\mathrm{OH}\) and \(\mathrm{CF}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{~F}\) are \(8.1 \times 10^{5}\) and \(63 \times 10^{8}\) molecules \(\mathrm{cm}^{-3}\), respectively, what is the rate of reaction at this temperature in \(M / \mathrm{s} ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free