Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As compared with \(\mathrm{CO}\) and \(\mathrm{O}_{2}, \mathrm{CS}\) and \(\mathrm{S}_{2}\) are very unstable molecules. Give an explanation based on the relative abilities of the sulfur and oxygen atoms to form \(\pi\) bonds.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The instability of CS and S2 as compared to CO and O2 can be attributed to the differences in the ability of oxygen and sulfur atoms to form π bonds. Oxygen atoms have a greater ability to form strong π bonds due to their unpaired electrons in two half-filled p orbitals and smaller atomic size, which allows for better orbital overlaps and stronger bonding. In contrast, sulfur has fewer unpaired electrons in its p orbitals and a larger atomic size, leading to weaker bonding and instability in molecules like CS and S2.

Step by step solution

01

Electron Configurations of Oxygen and Sulfur

First, we need to recall the electron configurations of oxygen and sulfur. Oxygen, atomic number 8, has an electron configuration of: 1s² 2s² 2p⁴. Sulfur, atomic number 16, has an electron configuration of: 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s² 3p⁴. In both cases, the p orbitals play a crucial role in the formation of π bonds. Oxygen has two half-filled p orbitals remaining, while sulfur has two half-filled and one completely filled p orbitals.
02

Atomic Orbitals Involved in π Bonds

π bonds are formed through the sideways overlap of p orbitals. Due to the presence of unpaired electrons in the p orbitals, oxygen can form two π bonds (in O2) while sulfur can form only one such π bond (in S2). Therefore, sulfur atoms are less capable of forming strong π bonds compared to oxygen.
03

Overlap and Bonding Strength

The strength of a π bond is governed by the extent of overlap between atomic orbitals. Since Oxygen is in the second period and Sulfur is in the third period, the size of the oxygen atom is smaller than the sulfur atom, leading to better orbital overlaps and stronger π bonds in oxygen-containing molecules (CO and O2) as compared to sulfur containing molecules (CS and S2).
04

Conclusion

In summary, the instability of CS and S2 as compared to CO and O2 can be explained by the differences in the formation of π bonds between sulfur and oxygen atoms. Oxygen has a greater ability to form π bonds due to its unpaired electrons and smaller atomic size, which allows for better orbital overlaps and stronger bonding. On the other hand, sulfur has a lower ability to form π bonds due to fewer unpaired electrons and larger atomic size, resulting in weaker bonding and instability of the molecules CS and S2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following molecular orbitals formed from the combination of two hydrogen \(1 s\) orbitals: a. Which is the bonding molecular orbital and which is the antibonding molecular orbital? Explain how you can tell by looking at their shapes. b. Which of the two molecular orbitals is lower in energy? Why is this true?

Compare and contrast the MO model with the local electron model. When is each useful?

Which is the more correct statement: "The methane molecule \(\left(\mathrm{CH}_{4}\right)\) is a tetrahedral molecule because it is \(s p^{3}\) hybridized" or "The methane molecule \(\left(\mathrm{CH}_{4}\right)\) is \(s p^{3}\) hybridized because it is a tetrahedral molecule"? What, if anything, is the difference between these two statements?

Which of the following statements is/are true? Correct the false statements. a. The molecules \(\operatorname{SeS}_{3}, \operatorname{SeS}_{2}, \operatorname{PCl}_{5}, \operatorname{TeCl}_{4},\) ICl \(_{3}\), and \(\mathrm{XeCl}_{2}\) all exhibit at least one bond angle which is approximately \(120^{\circ} .\) b. The bond angle in \(\mathrm{SO}_{2}\) should be similar to the bond angle in \(\mathrm{CS}_{2}\) or \(\mathrm{SCl}_{2}\) c. Of the compounds \(\mathrm{CF}_{4}, \mathrm{KrF}_{4},\) and \(\mathrm{SeF}_{4},\) only \(\mathrm{SeF}_{4}\) exhibits an overall dipole moment (is polar). d. Central atoms in a molecule adopt a geometry of the bonded atoms and lone pairs about the central atom in order to maximize electron repulsions.

Compare and contrast bonding molecular orbitals with antibonding molecular orbitals.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free