Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

There is a trend in the United States toward using coal-fired power plants to generate electricity rather than building new nuclear fission power plants. Is the use of coal-fired power plants without risk? Make a list of the risks to society from the use of each type of power plant.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In conclusion, both coal-fired and nuclear fission power plants pose various risks to society. Coal-fired power plants contribute to air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, water usage and pollution, waste disposal issues, and occupational hazards. In contrast, the risks for nuclear fission power plants include nuclear accidents, radioactive waste, water usage and pollution, security concerns, and decommissioning challenges. It is essential to weigh these risks and explore sustainable energy sources to reduce their impacts on society and the environment.

Step by step solution

01

Research the risks of coal-fired power plants

Firstly, it's essential to gather information on the risks associated with using coal-fired power plants to produce electricity. Some common risks include: 1. Air pollution: Burning coal releases significant amounts of hazardous air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter into the atmosphere. 2. Greenhouse gas emissions: Coal-fired power plants are one of the largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide, contributing to climate change. 3. Water usage and pollution: These power plants require large amounts of water for cooling and emit toxic pollutants into water sources, affecting ecosystems and water quality. 4. Waste disposal: Coal ash and other by-products from burning coal can be hazardous and need proper disposal to avoid soil contamination and other environmental issues. 5. Occupational hazards: Workers at coal-fired power plants face health and safety risks like mining accidents, coal dust exposure, and long-term health problems.
02

Research the risks of nuclear fission power plants

Now, let's explore the risks associated with using nuclear fission power plants for generating electricity. Some common risks include: 1. Nuclear accidents: Although rare, failures in nuclear reactors, such as the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents, can have severe and long-lasting consequences for human health and the environment. 2. Radioactive waste: Nuclear fission creates long-lived and highly radioactive waste, which requires secure storage and handling for thousands of years. 3. Water usage and pollution: Similar to coal-fired power plants, nuclear power plants also require a large amount of water for cooling, and in some cases, might cause water pollution and thermal pollution in aquatic ecosystems. 4. Security concerns: Nuclear materials can be a target for theft or terrorist activities, or be used for the production of illicit nuclear weapons. 5. Decommissioning: Dismantling nuclear power plants after their operational life is complex, time-consuming, and expensive, with potential environmental and financial risks.
03

Summarize the risks in a list

Finally, let's create a list of risks associated with using coal-fired and nuclear fission power plants for generating electricity. Risks of coal-fired power plants: 1. Air pollution 2. Greenhouse gas emissions 3. Water usage and pollution 4. Waste disposal 5. Occupational hazards Risks of nuclear fission power plants: 1. Nuclear accidents 2. Radioactive waste 3. Water usage and pollution 4. Security concerns 5. Decommissioning In conclusion, while using coal-fired power plants may seem appealing due to the reduced complexity compared to nuclear fission power plants, it presents significant environmental, health, and safety risks. On the other hand, nuclear fission power plants also have risks associated with accidents, waste, and security. It is essential for society to weigh these risks and invest in sustainable energy sources to minimize their impacts.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which do you think would be the greater health hazard: the release of a radioactive nuclide of Sr or a radioactive nuclide of Xe into the environment? Assume the amount of radioactivity is the same in each case. Explain your answer on the basis of the chemical properties of \(\mathrm{Sr}\) and Xe. Why are the chemical properties of a radioactive substance important in assessing its potential health hazards?

Write an equation describing the radioactive decay of each of the following nuclides. (The particle produced is shown in parentheses, except for electron capture, where an electron is a reactant.) a. \(\frac{3}{1} \mathrm{H}(\beta)\) b. \(\frac{8}{3} L i(\beta \text { followed by } \alpha)\) c. \(^{7}_{4}\) Be (electron capture)d. \(^{8}_{5} B\) (positron)

Fresh rainwater or surface water contains enough tritium ( \(^{3}_{1} \mathrm{H}\) ) to show 5.5 decay events per minute per \(100 .\) g water. Tritium has a half-life of 12.3 years. You are asked to check a vintage wine that is claimed to have been produced in \(1946 .\) How many decay events per minute should you expect to observe in \(100 .\) g of that wine?

To determine the \(K_{\mathrm{sp}}\) value of \(\mathrm{Hg}_{2} \mathrm{I}_{2},\) a chemist obtained a solid sample of \(\mathrm{Hg}_{2} \mathrm{I}_{2}\) in which some of the iodine is present as radioactive \(^{131}\) I. The count rate of the \(\mathrm{Hg}_{2} \mathrm{I}_{2}\) sample is \(5.0 \times 10^{11}\) counts per minute per mole of I. An excess amount of \(\mathrm{Hg}_{2} \mathrm{I}_{2}(s)\) is placed into some water, and the solid is allowed to come to equilibrium with its respective ions. A 150.0 -mL sample of the saturated solution is withdrawn and the radioactivity measured at 33 counts per minute. From this information, calculate the \(K_{\mathrm{sp}}\) value for \(\mathrm{Hg}_{2} \mathrm{I}_{2}\) $$\mathrm{Hg}_{22}(s) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+}(a q)+2 \mathrm{I}^{-}(a q) \quad K_{\mathrm{sp}}=\left[\mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+}\right]\left[\mathrm{I}^{-}\right]^{2}$$

Iodine-131 is used in the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid disease and has a half-life of 8.0 days. If a patient with thyroid disease consumes a sample of \(\mathrm{Na}^{131}\) I containing \(10 . \mu \mathrm{g}^{131} \mathrm{I}\) how long will it take for the amount of \(^{131}\) I to decrease to \(1 / 100\) of the original amount?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free