Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A recent study concluded that any amount of radiation exposure can cause biological damage. Explain the differences between the two models of radiation damage, the linear model and the threshold model.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The linear model (LNT) suggests a linear relationship between radiation exposure and biological damage, meaning any radiation exposure, even small doses, can cause proportional damage. The threshold model, however, proposes a threshold level below which no significant biological damage occurs, as the body can repair damage from low levels of radiation. Key differences include: 1) LNT assumes any radiation exposure causes damage, while threshold assumes negligible risk at low doses; 2) LNT suggests proportionality between exposure and damage, while the threshold model does not; and 3) LNT does not account for the body's repair ability, while the threshold model does.

Step by step solution

01

Linear Model of Radiation Damage

The linear model, also known as the linear no-threshold model (LNT), suggests that there is a linear relationship between the amount of radiation exposure and the biological damage it causes. This means that any increase in radiation exposure will result in a proportional increase in biological damage, and it suggests that any amount of radiation, even very small doses, can lead to some biological damage.
02

Threshold Model of Radiation Damage

The threshold model proposes that there is a certain level of radiation exposure, called the threshold, below which there is no significant biological damage. According to this model, the body can repair damage caused by low levels of radiation, and only when the radiation exposure surpasses the threshold level will significant damage occur. This model assumes that the risks of radiation exposure are negligible at low doses and only become significant when the exposure reaches or exceeds the threshold.
03

Key Differences between the Linear and Threshold Models

1. The linear model assumes that any amount of radiation exposure, even very small doses, can cause biological damage, whereas the threshold model assumes that the risks of radiation exposure are negligible at low doses and only become significant when the exposure reaches or exceeds the threshold. 2. The linear model suggests a proportional relationship between radiation exposure and biological damage, while the threshold model does not have such a linear relationship, as it only considers damage significant above a certain threshold. 3. The linear model does not take into account the body's ability to repair the biological damage caused by low levels of radiation, whereas the threshold model attributes a threshold level to the body's ability to repair the damage before significant harm occurs. In conclusion, the linear model and the threshold model of radiation damage represent two different ways of understanding the relationship between radiation exposure and biological damage. The linear model suggests that any amount of radiation exposure can lead to proportional damage, while the threshold model implies that there is a certain level of exposure below which the risks are negligible.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Write an equation describing the radioactive decay of each of the following nuclides. (The particle produced is shown in parentheses, except for electron capture, where an electron is a reactant.) a. \(\frac{3}{1} \mathrm{H}(\beta)\) b. \(\frac{8}{3} L i(\beta \text { followed by } \alpha)\) c. \(^{7}_{4}\) Be (electron capture)d. \(^{8}_{5} B\) (positron)

A rock contains \(0.688 \mathrm{mg}^{206} \mathrm{Pb}\) for every \(1.000 \mathrm{mg}\) \(^{238} \mathrm{U}\) present Assuming that no lead was originally present, that all the \(^{206} \mathrm{Pb}\) formed over the years has remained in the rock, and that the number of nuclides in intermediate stages of decay between \(^{238} \mathrm{U}\) and \(^{206} \mathrm{Pb}\) is negligible, calculate the age of the \(\text { rock. For }^{238} \mathbf{U}, t_{1 / 2}=4.5 \times 10^{9} \text { years. }\)

Uranium- 235 undergoes many different fission reactions. For one such reaction, when \(^{235} \mathrm{U}\) is struck with a neutron, \(^{144} \mathrm{Ce}\) and \(^{90}\) Sr are produced along with some neutrons and electrons. How many neutrons and \(\beta\) -particles are produced in this fission reaction?

There is a trend in the United States toward using coal-fired power plants to generate electricity rather than building new nuclear fission power plants. Is the use of coal-fired power plants without risk? Make a list of the risks to society from the use of each type of power plant.

Strontium-90 and radon-222 both pose serious health risks. \(^{90}\) \(\mathrm{Sr}\) decays by \(\beta\) -particle production and has a relatively long half-life (28.9 years). Radon-222 decays by \(\alpha\) -particle production and has a relatively short half-life (3.82 days). Explain why each decay process poses health risks.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free