Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Use formal charge arguments to explain why \(\mathrm{CO}\) has a much smaller dipole moment than would be expected on the basis of electronegativity.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The smaller dipole moment in CO can be explained using formal charge arguments. Although oxygen is more electronegative than carbon, both atoms have a formal charge of 0 in the molecule's Lewis structure. This indicates no charge separation between the atoms due to the equal sharing of electrons in the triple bond, resulting in a less polar bond and a smaller overall electric dipole moment than expected based on electronegativity alone.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Lewis structure of CO

First, we need to determine the Lewis structure of CO. Carbon has 4 valence electrons and oxygen has 6 valence electrons, giving a total of 10 valence electrons in the CO molecule. The most stable Lewis structure for CO is a triple bond between the carbon and oxygen atoms, with one lone pair on the carbon atom and two lone pairs on the oxygen atom. Here's an example of what this structure looks like: ``` :C≡O: ```
02

Calculate formal charges

Next, we will calculate the formal charges of the carbon and oxygen atoms in the Lewis structure. Formal charge is calculated using the formula: Formal charge = (number of valence electrons on the free atom) - (number of non-bonding electrons) - (½ × number of bonding electrons) For carbon, the formal charge is: Formal charge of C = (4) - (2) - (½ × 6) = 0 For oxygen, the formal charge is: Formal charge of O = (6) - (4) - (½ × 6) = 0 Both atoms have a formal charge of 0.
03

Relate formal charges to dipole moment

Since both the carbon and oxygen atoms have a formal charge of 0, there is no charge separation between the atoms in the CO molecule, despite their different electronegativities. The equal sharing of electrons in the triple bond between carbon and oxygen results in a less polar bond than would be expected based on electronegativity alone. As a result, the dipole moment of CO is much smaller than expected, based on the electronegativities of carbon and oxygen. This means that the CO molecule is less polar, leading to a smaller overall electric dipole moment. In conclusion, the smaller dipole moment in CO can be explained by the formal charge arguments, which reveal that there is no charge separation between the carbon and oxygen atoms in the molecule due to the equal sharing of electrons in the triple bond. Although oxygen is more electronegative than carbon, the structure of the molecule leads to a smaller dipole moment than would be expected based on their electronegativities.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The most common type of exception to the octet rule are compounds or ions with central atoms having more than eight electrons around them. \(\mathrm{PF}_{5}, \mathrm{SF}_{4}, \mathrm{ClF}_{3}\) and \(\mathrm{Br}_{3}^{-}\) are examples of this type of exception. Draw the Lewis structure for these compounds on ions. Which elements, when they have to, can have more than eight electrons around them? How is this rationalized?

Use the following standard enthalpies of formation to estimate the \(\mathrm{N}-\mathrm{H}\) bond energy in ammonia: \(\mathrm{N}(\mathrm{g}), 472.7 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{mol} ; \mathrm{H}(\mathrm{g})\), \(216.0 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{mol} ; \mathrm{NH}_{3}(g),-46.1 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{mol}\). Compare your value to the one in Table \(8.4\).

Predict the molecular structure for each of the following. (See Exercises 105 and \(106 .\) ) a. \(\mathrm{BrFI}_{2}\) b. \(\mathrm{XeO}_{2} \mathrm{~F}_{2}\) c. \(\mathrm{TeF}_{2} \mathrm{Cl}_{3}^{-}\) For each formula there are at least two different structures that can be drawn using the same central atom. Draw all possible structures for each formula.

Write electron configurations for the most stable ion formed by each of the elements Te, \(\mathrm{Cl}, \mathrm{Sr}\), and \(\mathrm{Li}\) (when in stable ionic compounds).

Think of forming an ionic compound as three steps (this is a simplification, as with all models): (1) removing an electron from the metal; (2) adding an electron to the nonmetal; and (3) allowing the metal cation and nonmetal anion to come together. a. What is the sign of the energy change for each of these three processes? b. In general, what is the sign of the sum of the first two processes? Use examples to support your answer. c. What must be the sign of the sum of the three processes? d. Given your answer to part \(\mathrm{c}\), why do ionic bonds occur? e. Given your above explanations, why is NaCl stable but not \(\mathrm{Na}_{2} \mathrm{Cl} ? \mathrm{NaCl}_{2} ?\) What about \(\mathrm{MgO}\) compared to \(\mathrm{MgO}_{2} ?\) \(\mathrm{Mg}_{2} \mathrm{O} ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free