Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A recent study concluded that any amount of radiation exposure can cause biological damage. Explain the differences between the two models of radiation damage, the linear model and the threshold model.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The linear no-threshold (LNT) model of radiation damage assumes that any amount of radiation exposure, no matter how small, can cause biological damage, with the risk of damage increasing linearly as the dose increases. In contrast, the threshold model asserts that there is a certain level of radiation exposure below which no biological damage occurs, and the risk of damage increases only once the dose surpasses this threshold level. The LNT model is considered conservative, offering maximum protection to exposed individuals, and is widely used in setting radiation safety standards. The threshold model is less conservative, suggesting a safe level of radiation, and may be used in specific situations where a safe dose is well-established.

Step by step solution

01

Linear Model Description

The linear model, often referred to as the linear no-threshold (LNT) model, is based on the assumption that any amount of radiation exposure, no matter how small, can cause biological damage. This model suggests that there is a linear relationship between radiation dose and biological damage, meaning that as the radiation dose increases, the risk of damage and harm correspondingly increases.
02

Threshold Model Description

The threshold model, on the other hand, asserts that there is a certain level of radiation exposure below which no biological damage occurs. In this model, once the radiation dose surpasses the threshold level, the risk of biological damage starts to increase. This implies that there is a "safe" level of radiation exposure below which no harmful effects are expected.
03

Differences between Linear and Threshold Models

1. No Safe Level vs. Safe Level: In the linear model, there is no safe level of radiation exposure, as any amount of radiation can cause biological damage. In contrast, the threshold model suggests that there is a "safe" level of radiation below which no harmful effects are expected. 2. Linear Relationship vs. Threshold Relationship: The linear model posits a linear relationship between radiation dose and biological damage, meaning that as the radiation dose increases, so does the risk of damage. The threshold model, however, demonstrates a threshold relationship, where there is no increase in risk until the dose surpasses the threshold level, after which the risk starts to rise. 3. Conservative vs. Non-conservative: The linear model is considered conservative, as it assumes that even the smallest amount of radiation exposure is harmful. It is designed to offer maximum protection to exposed individuals by assuming the worst-case scenario. The threshold model is less conservative, as it suggests a safe level of radiation exposure below which no biological damage occurs. 4. Use in Radiation Safety Standards: The linear model is widely used in setting radiation safety standards due to its conservative approach. The threshold model, although less conservative, is sometimes used for setting safety standards in specific situations where the existence of a safe dose is well-established.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Uranium- 235 undergoes a series of \(\alpha\) -particle and \(\beta\) -particle productions to end up as lead-207. How many \(\alpha\) particles and \(\beta\) particles are produced in the complete decay series?

Fresh rainwater or surface water contains enough tritium \(\left({ }^{3} \mathrm{H}\right)\) to show \(5.5\) decay events per minute per \(100 . \mathrm{g}\) water. Tritium has a half-life of \(12.3\) years. You are asked to check a vintage wine that is claimed to have been produced in \(1946 .\) How many decay events per minute should you expect to observe in \(100 . \mathrm{g}\) of that wine?

Scientists have estimated that the earth's crust was formed \(4.3\) billion years ago. The radioactive nuclide \({ }^{176} \mathrm{Lu}\), which decays to \({ }^{176} \mathrm{Hf}\), was used to estimate this age. The half-life of \({ }^{176} \mathrm{Lu}\) is 37 billion years. How are ratios of \({ }^{176} \mathrm{Lu}\) to \({ }^{176} \mathrm{Hf}\) utilized to date very old rocks?

A positron and an electron can annihilate each other on colliding, producing energy as photons: $${ }_{-1}^{0} \mathrm{e}+{ }_{+1}^{0} \mathrm{e} \longrightarrow 2{ }_{0}^{0} \gamma$$ Assuming that both \(\gamma\) rays have the same energy, calculate the wavelength of the electromagnetic radiation produced.

The mass percent of carbon in a typical human is \(18 \%\), and the mass percent of \({ }^{14} \mathrm{C}\) in natural carbon is \(1.6 \times 10^{-10} \%\). Assuming a \(180-\mathrm{lb}\) person, how many decay events per second occur in this person due exclusively to the \(\beta\) -particle decay of \({ }^{14} \mathrm{C}\) (for \({ }^{14} \mathrm{C}\), \(t_{1 / 2}=5730\) years)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free