Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the reactions $$\begin{aligned}\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}(a q)+6 \mathrm{NH}_{3}(a q) & \longrightarrow \mathrm{Ni}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{6}^{2+}(a q) \\ \mathrm{Ni}^{2+}(a q)+3 \mathrm{en}(a q) & \longrightarrow \mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{en})_{3}^{2+}(a q)\end{aligned}$$ where $$\text { en }=\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{~N}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{NH}_{2}$$ The \(\Delta H\) values for the two reactions are quite similar, yet \(K_{\text {reaction } 2}>K_{\text {reaction } 1 .}\) Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The difference in the equilibrium constants (K) for the two reactions is due to the difference in the change in entropy (ΔS). Ethylenediamine (en) is a bidentate ligand and can replace two ammonia ligands, resulting in a greater decrease in entropy (more negative ΔS) in reaction 2. This leads to a more negative Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and a higher equilibrium constant (K₂) for reaction 2 compared to reaction 1.

Step by step solution

01

Recall the equilibrium constant (K) and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) equation:

First, remember the equation that relates the equilibrium constant (K) to the Gibbs free energy change (ΔG): ΔG = -RT ln(K) From this equation, we can tell that as the equilibrium constant (K) increases, the Gibbs free energy change (ΔG) becomes more negative.
02

Analyze the change in enthalpy (ΔH) and change in entropy (ΔS):

We are given that the change in enthalpy (ΔH) for both reactions are quite similar. So, we should focus on the change in entropy (ΔS) to explain the difference in equilibrium constants. Recall the equation that relates ΔG, ΔH, and ΔS: ΔG = ΔH - TΔS When the reactions have similar ΔH values but different ΔG values, it is the ΔS value that accounts for the difference.
03

Compare the reactions in terms of ligands being used:

Reaction 1 involves ammonia (NH₃) as the ligand, while reaction 2 involves ethylenediamine (en) as the ligand. Ethylenediamine is a bidentate ligand, meaning it has two donor atoms that can bind to the central metal atom, in this case, Ni²⁺. Ammonia is a monodentate ligand, meaning it has only one donor atom that can bind to the central metal atom.
04

Relate the difference in ligands to the change in entropy (ΔS):

As ethylenediamine is a bidentate ligand, it can replace two ammonia ligands in the coordination sphere of the nickel ion. This results in a decrease in the number of particles in the reaction. The decrease in the number of particles corresponds to a decrease in entropy (ΔS) for reaction 2. Since reaction 1 involves six ammonia ligands, there is a relatively smaller decrease in particles and thus a smaller decrease in entropy (ΔS) in comparison to reaction 2.
05

Relate the change in entropy (ΔS) to the equilibrium constants (K):

From the equations ΔG = -RT ln(K) and ΔG = ΔH - TΔS, It can be inferred that the reaction 2 with a lower ΔS (more negative) will have more negative ΔG, leading to a higher equilibrium constant (K₂). On the other hand, reaction 1 with a lesser decrease in entropy (less negative ΔS) will have a less negative ΔG, leading to a lower equilibrium constant (K₁). By understanding the relationship between the changes in enthalpy, Gibbs free energy, and entropy, we can explain that K₂ > K₁ is due to the greater decrease in entropy (ΔS) in reaction 2 involving bidentate ligand ethylenediamine compared to reaction 1 involving monodentate ligand ammonia.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Gibbs free energy
Gibbs free energy is a crucial concept in chemistry that predicts whether a reaction will occur spontaneously. Spontaneous reactions are ones that happen without needing an extra push from the outside, like heat or pressure. The key formula to remember is \[ \Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S \]where
  • \(\Delta G\) stands for the change in Gibbs free energy.
  • \(\Delta H\) is the change in enthalpy.
  • \(T\) represents the temperature in Kelvin.
  • \(\Delta S\) is the change in entropy.
For spontaneous reactions, \(\Delta G\) must be negative. Such reactions naturally favor the formation of products. If \(\Delta G\) is positive, energy is required for the reaction to proceed. The Gibbs free energy equation indicates that reactions with large positive \(\Delta S\) or highly exothermic \(\Delta H\) can lead to negative \(\Delta G\), enhancing spontaneity.
Enthalpy
Enthalpy change, denoted as \(\Delta H\), represents the heat absorbed or released in a reaction at constant pressure. Essentially, it's a measure of the total energy change. When an exothermic reaction occurs, \(\Delta H\) is negative, meaning heat is released to the surroundings.
In contrast, an endothermic reaction absorbs heat, indicated by a positive \(\Delta H\).
Although both reactions with nickel ions and ammonia or ethylenediamine have similar \(\Delta H\) values, the driving factor for their equilibrium constant differences lies elsewhere. Enthalpy by itself does not define the direction or extent of a reaction, which is why understanding \(\Delta G\) and \(\Delta S\) is essential.
Entropy
Entropy, symbolized by \(\Delta S\), is often described as the measure of disorder or randomness within a system. In chemical reactions, entropy helps understand the distribution of particles and energy among reactants and products.
A positive \(\Delta S\) implies greater randomness or disorder post-reaction, favoring spontaneity, while a negative \(\Delta S\) suggests the system has moved towards order, potentially opposing it. In our exercise, the reaction involving ethylenediamine as a ligand decreases the number of free particles more significantly compared to the ammonia ligand reaction, leading to a more negative \(\Delta S\).
This increased order (or reduced disorder) explains the higher equilibrium constant for the reaction with ethylenediamine.
Ligands
Ligands are molecules or ions that bind to a central metal atom to form a coordination complex. They are essential in determining the structure and stability of complexes. Ligands donate their electrons to the metal atom, thus forming a coordinate bond. They play a vital role in various applications, from catalysis to biological systems.
- Ligands vary in size, charge, and the number of binding sites. - They can influence the properties and reactivity of the metal center. In chemical reactions, the nature of ligands (such as being bidentate or monodentate) affects the reaction's entropy and ultimately the equilibrium constant of the reaction.
Bidentate and monodentate ligands
The distinction between bidentate and monodentate ligands lies in the number of sites through which they can attach to a metal ion. A monodentate ligand features only one donor atom through which it binds to the metal center. A common example is ammonia (NH₃), which donates a single pair of electrons from one nitrogen atom.
Bidentate ligands, like ethylenediamine (en), have two donor atoms, allowing them to form two bonds with the metal ion.
  • Bidentate ligands can create more stable chelate complexes due to the "bite" of two connections.
  • They tend to increase the overall stability of the complex and influence the solution's entropy significantly.
In this exercise, ethylenediamine replaces two ammonia ligands, reducing the number of molecules, thus decreasing entropy, and this change impacts the equilibrium constant, showing why \(K_2\) is larger than \(K_1\).

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Impure nickel, refined by smelting sulfide ores in a blast furnace, can be converted into metal from \(99.90 \%\) to \(99.99 \%\) purity by the Mond process. The primary reaction involved in the Mond process is $$\mathrm{Ni}(s)+4 \mathrm{CO}(g) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CO})_{4}(g)$$ a. Without referring to Appendix 4, predict the sign of \(\Delta S^{\circ}\) for the above reaction. Explain. b. The spontaneity of the above reaction is temperature dependent. Predict the sign of \(\Delta S_{\text {sarr }}\) for this reaction. Explain. c. For \(\mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CO})_{4}(g), \Delta H_{\mathrm{f}}^{\circ}=-607 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{mol}\) and \(S^{\circ}=417 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{K} \cdot \mathrm{mol}\) at \(298 \mathrm{~K}\). Using these values and data in Appendix 4, calculate \(\Delta H^{\circ}\) and \(\Delta S^{\circ}\) for the above reaction. d. Calculate the temperature at which \(\Delta G^{\circ}=0(K=1)\) for the above reaction, assuming that \(\Delta H^{\circ}\) and \(\Delta S^{\circ}\) do not depend on temperature. e. The first step of the Mond process involves equilibrating impure nickel with \(\mathrm{CO}(\mathrm{g})\) and \(\mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CO})_{4}(g)\) at about \(50^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The purpose of this step is to convert as much nickel as possible into the gas phase. Calculate the equilibrium constant for the preceding reaction at \(50 .{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). f. In the second step of the Mond process, the gaseous \(\mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CO})_{4}\) is isolated and heated to \(227^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The purpose of this step is to deposit as much nickel as possible as pure solid (the reverse of the preceding reaction). Calculate the equilibrium constant for the preceding reaction at \(227^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). g. Why is temperature increased for the second step of the Mond process? h. The Mond process relies on the volatility of \(\mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CO})_{4}\) for its success. Only pressures and temperatures at which \(\mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CO})_{4}\) is a gas are useful. A recently developed variation of the Mond process carries out the first step at higher pressures and a temperature of \(152^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Estimate the maximum pressure of \(\mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CO})_{4}(g)\) that can be attained before the gas will liquefy at \(152^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The boiling point for \(\mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CO})_{4}\) is \(42^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and the enthalpy of vaporization is \(29.0 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{mol}\).

Consider the reaction $$2 \mathrm{O}(g) \longrightarrow \mathrm{O}_{2}(g)$$ a. Predict the signs of \(\Delta H\) and \(\Delta S\). b. Would the reaction be more spontaneous at high or low temperatures?

Entropy has been described as "time's arrow." Interpret this view of entropy.

For the process \(\mathrm{A}(l) \longrightarrow \mathrm{A}(g)\), which direction is favored by changes in energy probability? Positional probability? Explain your answers. If you wanted to favor the process as written, would you raise or lower the temperature of the system? Explain.

Carbon monoxide is toxic because it bonds much more strongly to the iron in hemoglobin (Hgb) than does \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\). Consider the following reactions and approximate standard free energy changes: $$\begin{array}{clr}\mathrm{Hgb}+\mathrm{O}_{2} \longrightarrow \mathrm{HgbO}_{2} & \Delta G^{\circ}=-70 \mathrm{~kJ} \\ \mathrm{Hgb}+\mathrm{CO} \longrightarrow \mathrm{HgbCO} & \Delta G^{\circ}=-80 \mathrm{~kJ} \end{array}$$ Using these data, estimate the equilibrium constant value at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) for the following reaction: $$\mathrm{HgbO}_{2}+\mathrm{CO} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{HgbCO}+\mathrm{O}_{2}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free