Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What are rad and rem, and how are they related?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Rad measures absorbed dose; rem measures biological effect with quality factor.

Step by step solution

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

  • Unlimited AI interaction
  • Study offline
  • Say goodbye to ads
  • Export flashcards

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

01

Understanding Rad and Rem

The 'rad' and 'rem' are both units of measurement used to quantify radiation dose. The 'rad' stands for "radiation absorbed dose" and is an older unit that measures the amount of radiation energy absorbed per unit mass of a material, specifically 0.01 joules per kilogram. The 'rem' stands for "roentgen equivalent man" and considers not just the absorbed dose, but also the biological effect of the radiation.
02

Relating Rad to Rem

To relate rad and rem, it's important to understand the quality factor, which accounts for the different biological effects of various types of radiation. The quality factor is a dimensionless factor used to convert absorbed dose (rad) to equivalent dose (rem). This relationship is generally expressed with the formula: \( ext{rem} = ext{rad} imes ext{QF} \), where QF is the quality factor. For X-rays, gamma rays, and beta particles, the quality factor is typically 1, which makes \( 1 ext{ rad} = 1 ext{ rem} \).

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Rad (Radiation Absorbed Dose)
The term 'rad' stands for "radiation absorbed dose." It is used to measure the amount of energy deposited by radiation in any material, including human tissue. Specifically, 1 rad represents the absorption of 0.01 joules of radiation energy per kilogram of absorbing material. This unit has been largely replaced by the gray (Gy) in the International System of Units, where 1 Gy equals 100 rad.
However, the concept of rad remains important in understanding radiation exposure, as it quantifies how much radiation is deposited, rather than its potential biological impact. To effectively compare or integrate with other measurements, it is essential to grasp how energy absorption directly influences medical and safety contexts.
Rem (Roentgen Equivalent Man)
A 'rem' stands for "roentgen equivalent man" and extends beyond just the absorbed radiation dose. The rem takes into account not only the amount of energy absorbed but also the biological effects that different types of radiation have on human tissue.
This unit integrates the concept of biological damage into the measurement. While the rad simply measures energy absorption mechanically, the rem considers the potential for such absorbed energy to cause harm by incorporating a weight for biological effectiveness. The rem has likewise been largely replaced by the sievert (Sv) in modern measurements, where 1 Sv equals 100 rem.
Quality Factor in Radiation
The quality factor (QF) is a crucial concept when converting measurements from rads to rems. It serves as a multiplier that adjusts the absorbed dose based on the biological effectiveness of the type of radiation. Different types of radiation impart varying levels of harm, even if they transfer the same amount of energy.
For example, alpha particles, which have a high potential to cause biological damage, have a much higher quality factor compared to the more penetrating and less ionizing X-rays and gamma rays. In practice, this means different QFs are applied to achieve an equivalent dose in rems from the absorbed dose in rads.
  • Alpha particles: Typically a high QF.
  • X-rays and gamma rays: QF of 1.
  • Neutrons: Intermediate QF, depending on energy level.
By using the formula \(\text{rem} = \text{rad} \times \text{QF}\), healthcare professionals and safety regulators can better assess and compare the potential risk of different radiation sources.
Biological Effects of Radiation
Radiation impacts living tissues differently based on the type, energy, and exposure duration. Some radiation types cause more significant damage per absorbed unit of energy, which necessitates quantifying doses not just by energy imparted but by their biological impact.
It’s this biological impact consideration that requires the use of units like rems or sieverts, rather than simply measuring in rads. The biological effects are often specific to the type of radiation and include cell damage, mutagenic effects, and heightened risk of cancers.
  • Ionizing radiation can break chemical bonds, leading to cellular damage.
  • Acute exposure can result in radiation sickness, characterized by nausea, fatigue, and burn-like symptoms.
  • Long-term exposure increases the risk of cancer due to potential DNA mutations.
Understanding these effects is essential for developing safety protocols and medical treatments, ensuring that exposure to radiation is minimized and effectively managed.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In each pair of isotopes shown, indicate which one you would expect to be radioactive: (a) \({ }_{10}^{20} \mathrm{Ne}\) or \({ }_{10}^{17} \mathrm{Ne}\) (b) \({ }_{20}^{40} \mathrm{Ca}\) or \({ }_{20}^{45} \mathrm{Ca}\) (c) \({ }_{42}^{95} \mathrm{Mo}\) or \({ }_{43}^{92} \mathrm{Tc}\) (d) \({ }_{80}^{195} \mathrm{Hg}\) or \({ }^{196} \mathrm{Hg},\) (e) \({ }_{83}^{209} \mathrm{Bi}\) or \({ }_{96}^{242} \mathrm{Cm} .\)

Consider the decay series \(\mathrm{A} \longrightarrow \mathrm{B} \longrightarrow \mathrm{C} \longrightarrow \mathrm{D}\) where \(\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B},\) and \(\mathrm{C}\) are radioactive isotopes with halflives of \(4.50 \mathrm{~s}, 15.0\) days, and \(1.00 \mathrm{~s},\) respectively, and \(\mathrm{D}\) is nonradioactive. Starting with 1.00 mole of \(\mathrm{A},\) and none of \(\mathrm{B}, \mathrm{C},\) or \(\mathrm{D},\) calculate the number of moles of \(\mathrm{A}\), \(\mathrm{B}, \mathrm{C},\) and \(\mathrm{D}\) left after 30 days.

During the past two decades, syntheses of elements 110 through 118 have been reported. Element 110 was created by bombarding \({ }^{208} \mathrm{~Pb}\) with \({ }^{62} \mathrm{Ni}\), element 111 was created by bombarding \({ }^{209} \mathrm{Bi}\) with \({ }^{64} \mathrm{Ni}\), element 112 was created by bombarding \({ }^{208} \mathrm{~Pb}\) with \({ }^{66} \mathrm{Zn}\), element 114 was created by bombarding \({ }^{244} \mathrm{Pu}\) with \({ }^{48} \mathrm{Ca}\), element 115 was created by bombarding \({ }^{243} \mathrm{Am}\) with \({ }^{48} \mathrm{Ca}\), element 116 was created by bombarding \({ }^{248} \mathrm{Cm}\) with \({ }^{48} \mathrm{Ca},\) element 117 was created by bombarding \({ }^{249} \mathrm{Bk}\) with \({ }^{48} \mathrm{Ca},\) and element 118 was created by bombarding \({ }^{249} \mathrm{Cf}\) with \({ }^{48} \mathrm{Ca}\). Write an equation for each synthesis and predict the chemical properties of these elements.

Why is it preferable to use nuclear binding energy per nucleon for a comparison of the stabilities of different nuclei?

Why do heavy elements such as uranium undergo fission whereas light elements such as hydrogen and lithium undergo fusion?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free