Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Compare the pros and cons of a fuel cell, such as the hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell, and a coal-fired power station for generating electricity.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Fuel cells are cleaner and more efficient but costlier; coal plants are cheaper but polluting.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Basics of Fuel Cells

A hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell generates electricity through the chemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen, producing water as a by-product. It is a clean energy technology that offers high efficiency.
02

Examine the Benefits of Fuel Cells

Fuel cells have several advantages, including high efficiency in energy conversion, environmental friendliness due to zero emissions (only water is produced), and the ability to provide energy on demand without combustion.
03

Identify the Drawbacks of Fuel Cells

The main cons include the high cost of production and materials, particularly platinum catalysts, challenges in hydrogen storage and distribution, and limited infrastructure for widespread adoption.
04

Understand How Coal-Fired Power Stations Work

Coal-fired power stations burn coal to produce steam, which drives turbines to generate electricity. They are a widely used and established technology.
05

List the Benefits of Coal-Fired Power Stations

The benefits include a well-established infrastructure, relatively low cost of electricity generation due to abundant coal resources, and the ability to provide continuous and reliable power output.
06

Note the Drawbacks of Coal-Fired Power Stations

These include significant environmental impacts such as high carbon dioxide emissions contributing to greenhouse gas pollution, harmful pollutants like sulfur and nitrogen oxides, and reliance on finite fossil fuel resources.
07

Compare Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Fuel cells are more efficient and environmentally friendly than coal-fired power stations as they produce electricity with higher efficiency and zero harmful emissions. In contrast, coal plants emit large amounts of pollutants.
08

Compare Infrastructure and Cost

Coal-fired power stations have a cost advantage due to existing infrastructure and lower operational costs, whereas fuel cells, although efficient, face high initial costs and limited infrastructure for hydrogen fuel.
09

Decision Making Based on Context

Fuel cells are more suitable for environments where environmental impact and efficiency are top priorities, whereas coal-fired stations are more feasible where cost and infrastructure availability are more critical factors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Fuel Cells
Fuel cells are devices that generate electricity through chemical reactions rather than combustion. One of the most common types is the hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell. These cells work by combining hydrogen and oxygen to produce electricity, heat, and water.
  • They operate quietly and efficiently, with a higher efficiency level than traditional combustion-based methods.
  • Since the by-product of the fuel cell reaction is water, they are considered environmentally friendly.
  • One downside is the high cost, primarily due to expensive materials like platinum used in the catalysts.
Understanding fuel cells can help uncover their potential to transform energy generation sustainably. Despite the challenges in cost and infrastructure, fuel cells offer a promising alternative for clean energy.
Coal-Fired Power Stations
Coal-fired power stations generate electricity by burning coal to heat water, producing steam that turns turbines.
  • These power stations are prevalent because of their well-established infrastructure and ability to generate large amounts of electricity.
  • Coal is often cheaper to extract and use than developing new energy technologies, providing a cost advantage.
  • However, they release significant amounts of pollutants, including CO₂, sulfur, and nitrogen oxides, which are harmful to both the environment and human health.
While coal-fired stations are reliable for continuous power, they pose serious environmental risks and rely on finite resources.
Hydrogen-Oxygen Fuel Cell
The hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell is a specific type of fuel cell that uses hydrogen as the fuel and oxygen from the air. This cell is highly efficient for generating electricity.
  • The process includes no combustion, resulting in no greenhouse gas emissions.
  • It efficiently converts chemical energy into electrical energy, making it ideal for applications where emission reduction is critical.
  • Challenges include efficient hydrogen storage and the development of infrastructure suitable for hydrogen fuel use.
Hydrogen-oxygen fuel cells provide a clean energy alternative, but broader adoption requires addressing the cost and infrastructure challenges.
Environmental Impact
Energy generation technologies vary significantly in terms of environmental impact. Fuel cells like hydrogen-oxygen variants are known for their minimal environmental footprint.
  • They produce only water as a by-product, avoiding emissions of harmful pollutants.
  • In contrast, coal-fired power stations contribute large amounts of CO₂ and other pollutants to the atmosphere.
  • The environmental impact of coal plants includes climate change acceleration and air and water pollution.
Reducing the environmental impact of energy generation remains a central focus, with fuel cells offering a step towards sustainable power solutions.
Energy Efficiency
Energy efficiency refers to how well a system converts energy input into useful output. Fuel cells are generally more energy-efficient than coal-fired power stations.
  • Fuel cells can convert chemical energy into electricity with higher efficiencies, often exceeding 60%.
  • Coal plants, on the other hand, typically have an efficiency of around 30% to 35% due to energy losses from heat.
  • Higher energy efficiency not only means less fuel is needed for the same amount of electricity but also leads to less waste and lower emissions.
Increased efficiency is crucial for reducing overall energy consumption and enhancing sustainability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the difference between a galvanic cell (such as a Daniell cell) and an electrolytic cell?

A steady current was passed through molten \(\operatorname{CoSO}_{4}\) until \(2.35 \mathrm{~g}\) of metallic cobalt was produced. Calculate the number of coulombs of electricity used.

For a number of years, it was not clear whether mercury(I) ions existed in solution as \(\mathrm{Hg}^{+}\) or as \(\mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+}\). To distinguish between these two possibilities, we could set up the following system: $$ \operatorname{Hg}(l) \mid \text { soln } \mathrm{A} \| \operatorname{soln} \mathrm{B} \mid \operatorname{Hg}(l)$$ where soln A contained 0.263 g mercury(I) nitrate per liter and soln B contained \(2.63 \mathrm{~g}\) mercury(I) nitrate per liter. If the measured emf of such a cell is \(0.0289 \mathrm{~V}\) at \(18^{\circ} \mathrm{C},\) what can you deduce about the nature of the mercury(I) ions?

How many faradays of electricity are required to produce (a) \(0.84 \mathrm{~L}\) of \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) at exactly 1 atm and \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) from aqueous \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}\) solution, (b) \(1.50 \mathrm{~L}\) of \(\mathrm{Cl}_{2}\) at \(750 \mathrm{mmHg}\) and \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) from molten \(\mathrm{NaCl}\), and (c) \(6.0 \mathrm{~g}\) of Sn from molten \(\mathrm{SnCl}_{2}\) ?

Fluorine \(\left(\mathrm{F}_{2}\right)\) is obtained by the electrolysis of liquid hydrogen fluoride (HF) containing potassium fluoride \((\mathrm{KF})\). (a) Write the half-cell reactions and the overall reaction for the process. (b) What is the purpose of \(\mathrm{KF}\) ? (c) Calculate the volume of \(\mathrm{F}_{2}\) (in liters) collected at \(24.0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and 1.2 atm after electrolyzing the solution for \(15 \mathrm{~h}\) at a current of \(502 \mathrm{~A}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free