Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Compare and contrast bonding molecular orbitals with antibonding molecular orbitals.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Bonding molecular orbitals are formed by constructive interference of atomic orbitals with same-sign wave functions, resulting in high electron density and stable chemical bonds. They have lower energy levels than their associated atomic orbitals. In contrast, antibonding molecular orbitals are formed by destructive interference of atomic orbitals with opposite-sign wave functions, leading to low electron density and potential bond weakening or breaking. They have higher energy levels than the atomic orbitals they originate from. Stability of a molecule is determined by comparing the number of electrons in the bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals using bond order formula. A positive bond order indicates stability, while a negative or zero bond order suggests instability.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction to Molecular Orbitals

Molecular orbitals are formed by the overlap of atomic orbitals from different atoms in a molecule. These orbitals can be classified into two types: bonding molecular orbitals and antibonding molecular orbitals. Both types of orbitals play a crucial role in determining the stability and properties of molecules. In this breakdown, we will compare and contrast these two types of molecular orbitals by discussing their formation, energy levels, electron occupancy, and effects on the stability of molecules.
02

Formation of Molecular Orbitals

Bonding molecular orbitals are formed by the constructive interference of atomic orbitals, which means that their wave functions have the same sign when they overlap. This results in a region of high electron density between the nuclei of the atoms, which helps to hold the atoms together and create a chemical bond. Antibonding molecular orbitals, on the other hand, are formed by the destructive interference of atomic orbitals, meaning that their wave functions have opposite signs when they overlap. This results in a region of low electron density between the nuclei, which can lead to the weakening or even breaking of chemical bonds.
03

Energy Levels of Molecular Orbitals

Bonding molecular orbitals have lower energy levels than the atomic orbitals they are formed from. This means that electrons occupying these orbitals are more stable and have lower energy compared to the electrons in the individual atomic orbitals. Antibonding molecular orbitals have higher energy levels than the atomic orbitals they are formed from, meaning that electrons occupying these orbitals are less stable and have higher energy compared to the electrons in the individual atomic orbitals. In general, the energy difference between bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals is referred to as the energy gap.
04

Electron Occupancy and Stability

Generally, electrons will occupy orbitals in increasing order of their energy levels. This means that bonding molecular orbitals will be filled before antibonding molecular orbitals for a stable molecule. When the number of electrons in bonding molecular orbitals is more significant than those in the antibonding molecular orbitals, the overall molecule is considered stable. However, if the number of electrons in antibonding molecular orbitals becomes higher, the molecule loses its stability and can be less likely to form or may dissociate.
05

Comparison of Stability and Bonding

The stability of a molecule can be determined by comparing the number of electrons in bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals. A higher number of electrons in bonding molecular orbitals contributes to the formation of stronger and more stable chemical bonds. Conversely, a higher number of electrons in antibonding molecular orbitals can lead to the weakening or breaking of chemical bonds, resulting in less stable or unstable molecules. To assess the overall stability, we can use the bond order formula: Bond order = (number of electrons in bonding orbitals - number of electrons in antibonding orbitals) / 2. A positive bond order indicates stability, while a negative or zero bond order suggests instability. In summary, bonding molecular orbitals are formed by the constructive interference of atomic orbitals and have lower energy levels, resulting in stable chemical bonds. Antibonding molecular orbitals are formed by the destructive interference of atomic orbitals and have higher energy levels, potentially leading to bond weakening or breaking. Comparing the number of electrons in bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals can help determine the stability of a molecule.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Carbon monoxide (CO) forms bonds to a variety of metals and metal ions. Its ability to bond to iron in hemoglobin is the reason that \(\mathrm{CO}\) is so toxic. The bond carbon monoxide forms to metals is through the carbon atom: $$ \mathrm{M}-\mathrm{C} \equiv \mathrm{O} $$ a. On the basis of electronegativities, would you expect the carbon atom or the oxygen atom to form bonds to metals? b. Assign formal charges to the atoms in CO. Which atom would you expect to bond to a metal on this basis? c. In the MO model, bonding MOs place more electron density near the more electronegative atom. (See the HF molecule in Figs. 9.43 and 9.44.) Antibonding MOs place more electron density near the less electronegative atom in the diatomic molecule. Use the MO model to predict which atom of carbon monoxide should form bonds to metals.

Using the molecular orbital model, write electron configurations for the following diatomic species and calculate the bond orders. Which ones are paramagnetic? $$ \text {a} \mathrm{Li}_{2} \quad \text { b. } \mathrm{C}_{2} \quad \text { c. } \mathrm{S}_{2} $$

Values of measured bond energies may vary greatly depending on the molecule studied. Consider the following reactions: $$ \begin{array}{ll}{\mathrm{NCl}_{3}(g) \longrightarrow \mathrm{NCl}_{2}(g)+\mathrm{Cl}(g)} & {\Delta H=375 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol}} \\ {\mathrm{ONCI}(g) \longrightarrow \mathrm{NO}(g)+\mathrm{Cl}(g)} & {\Delta H=158 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol}}\end{array} $$ Rationalize the difference in the values of \(\Delta H\) for these reactions, even though each reaction appears to involve only the breaking of one \(\mathrm{N}-\mathrm{Cl}\) bond. (Hint: Consider the bond order of the NO bond in ONCl and in NO.)

Consider the following molecular orbitals formed from the combination of two hydrogen 1s orbitals: a. Which is the bonding molecular orbital and which is the antibonding molecular orbital? Explain how you can tell by looking at their shapes. b. Which of the two molecular orbitals is lower in energy? Why is this true?

In which of the following diatomic molecules would the bond strength be expected to weaken as an electron is removed? $$ \begin{array}{ll}{\text { a. } H_{2}} & {\text { c. } C_{2}^{2-}} \\ {\text { b. } B_{2}} & {\text { d. OF }}\end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free