Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A certain concentration method works best when the analyte's concentration is approximately 10 ppb. (a) If the method requires a sample of \(0.5 \mathrm{~mL}\), about what mass of analyte is being measured? (b) If the analyte is present at \(10 \% \mathrm{w} / \mathrm{v}\), how would you prepare the sample for analysis? (c) Repeat for the case where the analyte is present at \(10 \% \mathrm{w} / \mathrm{w}\). (d) Based on your answers to parts (a)-(c), comment on the method's suitability for the determination of a major analyte.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The method is suited for trace analysis, but requires large dilution steps for major analytes, making it impractical for such applications.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Parts-per-billion (ppb)

Parts-per-billion (ppb) is a unit of concentration that measures the number of units of mass of a contaminant per 1 billion units of total mass. In this exercise, a ppb concentration is equivalent to micrograms per liter (µg/L) for our purposes.
02

Calculate Mass for Part (a)

Given a concentration of 10 ppb and a sample size of 0.5 mL, convert the sample volume to liters: 0.5 mL = 0.0005 L. Then calculate the mass in micrograms: Mass = concentration x volume = 10 µg/L x 0.0005 L = 0.005 µg.
03

Preparing Sample for Analysis - Part (b)

For 10% w/v concentration, this means 10 g of analyte in 100 mL of solution. To prepare a 0.5 mL sample, we need to dilute this solution to achieve 10 ppb. First calculate the concentration of the original solution in ppb: 1 g/mL = 1,000,000,000 ppb (since 1 g/mL = 1,000,000 µg/L). So 10% w/v = 100,000,000 ppb. Calculate the dilution factor needed to achieve 10 ppb: Dilution factor = original ppb / target ppb = 100,000,000 / 10 = 10,000,000. Therefore, diluting 1 mL of the 10% solution with 10,000,000 mL of solvent achieves the desired concentration.
04

Preparing Sample for Analysis - Part (c)

For a 10% w/w concentration, assume density of the solution is about 1 g/mL for simplicity. The calculation of 10% w/w in situations where density can't be ignored requires a different approach, but for simplicity, continue with the assumption. For 10% w/w, 10 g analyte in 100 g solution provides an analyte concentration akin to 100,000,000 ppb, just as before. The dilution factor remains 10,000,000 as calculated previously.
05

Evaluating Suitability - Part (d)

Given the calculations, this method is ideal for trace analysis rather than major analyte determination. For major components present at high concentrations, the need for significant dilution illustrates inefficiency. This is due to the method's high sensitivity, making it more suited for detection and measurement of trace concentrations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Parts-per-billion (ppb)
Parts-per-billion (ppb) is a unit of measurement often used in analytical chemistry to denote very low concentrations of substances. This measurement is crucial when dealing with contaminants or analytes present in small quantities within a large volume.
At its core, 1 ppb implies one part of a substance in one billion parts of another. For liquid solutions, this is often converted into micrograms per liter (µg/L) to maintain consistency with other measurement forms.
Understanding ppb is essential when conducting tests that require precision at minute scales, as it allows accurate determination of trace amounts of a substance within a sample.
Analyte concentration
In analytical chemistry, analyte concentration refers to the amount of a specific substance, the analyte, present within a given volume or mass of a sample. This concentration is usually expressed in terms of weight/volume (w/v) or weight/weight (w/w).
In this context, the problem involves evaluating a 10 ppb concentration which translates into a known quantity of the analyte when its weight is compared to the volume of the solution. Understanding how to determine and calculate analyte concentration is key to preparing samples and calibrating analytical methods for accurate analyses.
Sample preparation
Sample preparation is a critical step in analytical chemistry processes such as the determination of an analyte's concentration. This step involves obtaining a representative part of a larger mixture and often includes none, one, or several steps to ensure the sample is suitable for analysis.
In exercises such as this, sample preparation might involve processes like dilution or adding specific reagents to bring an analyte to a suitable concentration for measurement.
  • Samples may need careful handling to avoid contamination, which can skew results.
  • The goal is to form a sample that reflects the conditions and composition of the larger system.
Good sample preparation practices help minimize errors and improve the reliability of analytical results.
Dilution factor
The dilution factor is a critical concept when adjusting sample concentration from a higher to a lower level, as required in many analytical methods. It involves the ratio between the initial and desired concentrations.
To calculate the dilution factor, one must divide the concentration of the original solution by the target concentration. For example, when reducing a strong solution, such as 10% w/v to a trace-level concentration like 10 ppb, specific calculations inform the volume of solvent necessary for dilution.
Understanding dilution factors is vital for ensuring that analytes fall within a method's optimal detection range, avoiding the pitfalls of both over- and under-dilution.
Trace analysis sensitivity
Trace analysis sensitivity refers to the ability of an analytical method to detect and measure minute amounts of a substance within a sample. This sensitivity is critical in fields requiring detection of pollutants, toxins, or other analytes present at very low concentrations.
  • Methods with high sensitivity can detect exceedingly low concentrations, often necessitating advanced instrumentation and precise technique.
  • This capability is essential for applications such as environmental testing, forensic analysis, and compliance with safety standards.
The overall efficiency of a method in accurately identifying low-level analytes dictates its suitability for specific types of analysis and influences the decision-making process regarding its use.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A sample is analyzed to determine the concentration of an analyte. Under the conditions of the analysis the sensitivity is \(17.2 \mathrm{ppm}^{-1}\). What is the analyte's concentration if \(S_{\text {total }}\) is 35.2 and \(S_{\text {reag }}\) is \(0.6 ?\)

When working with a solid sample, often it is necessary to bring the analyte into solution by digesting the sample with a suitable solvent. Any remaining solid impurities are removed by filtration before continuing with the analysis. In a typical total analysis method, the procedure might read After digesting the sample in a beaker using approximately \(25 \mathrm{~mL}\) of solvent, remove any solid impurities that remain by passing the solution the analyte through filter paper, collecting the filtrate in a clean Erlenmeyer flask. Rinse the beaker with several small portions of solvent, passing these rinsings through the filter paper and collecting them in the same Erlenmeyer flask. Finally, rinse the filter paper with several portions of solvent, collecting the rinsings in the same Erlenmeyer flask. For a typical concentration method, however, the procedure might state After digesting the sample in a beaker using \(25.00 \mathrm{~mL}\) of solvent, remove any solid impurities by filtering a portion of the solution containing the analyte. Collect and discard the first several \(\mathrm{mL}\) of filtrate before collecting a sample of \(5.00 \mathrm{~mL}\) for further analysis. Explain why these two procedures are different.

Ibrahim and co-workers developed a new method for the quantitative analysis of hypoxanthine, a natural compound of some nucleic acids. As part of their study they evaluated the method's selectivity for hypoxanthine in the presence of several possible interferents, including ascorbic acid. (a) When analyzing a solution of \(1.12 \times 10^{-6} \mathrm{M}\) hypoxanthine the authors obtained a signal of \(7.45 \times 10^{-5}\) amps. What is the sensitivity for hypoxanthine? You may assume the signal has been corrected for the method blank. (b) When a solution containing \(1.12 \times 10^{-6} \mathrm{M}\) hypoxanthine and \(6.5 \times 10^{-5} \mathrm{M}\) ascorbic acid is analyzed a signal of \(4.04 \times 10^{-5}\) amps is obtained. What is the selectivity coefficient for this method? (c) Is the method more selective for hypoxanthine or for ascorbic acid? (d) What is the largest concentration of ascorbic acid that may be present if a concentration of \(1.12 \times 10^{-6} \mathrm{M}\) hypoxanthine is to be determined within \(1.0 \%\) ?

An analyst needs to evaluate the potential effect of an interferent, \(I,\) on the quantitative analysis for an analyte, \(A\). She begins by measuring the signal for a sample in which the interferent is absent and the analyte is present with a concentration of 15 ppm, obtaining an average signal of 23.3 (arbitrary units). When she analyzes a sample in which the analyte is absent and the interferent is present with a concentration of \(25 \mathrm{ppm}\), she obtains an average signal of 13.7 . (a) What is the sensitivity for the analyte? (b) What is the sensitivity for the interferent? (c) What is the value of the selectivity coefficient? (d) Is the method more selective for the analyte or the interferent? (e) What is the maximum concentration of interferent relative to that of the analyte if the error in the analysis is to be less than \(1 \% ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free