Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

To improve the sensitivity of a FIA analysis you might do any of the following: inject a larger volume of sample, increase the flow rate, decrease the length and the diameter of the manifold's tubing, or merge separate channels before injecting the sample. For each action, explain why it leads to an improvement in sensitivity.

Short Answer

Expert verified
To improve sensitivity: use larger sample volume, increase flow rate, shorten and narrow tubing, and merge channels before injection.

Step by step solution

01

Inject a Larger Volume of Sample

By injecting a larger volume of the sample, the concentration of the analyte in the detection zone increases. This increase in concentration enhances the signal detected by the instrument, leading to improved sensitivity as the detection system responds more significantly to the analyte present.
02

Increase the Flow Rate

Increasing the flow rate through the FIA system can improve sensitivity because it reduces the time the analyte spends in the manifold system, which in turn decreases dispersion. Less dispersion means a higher concentration of analyte reaches the detector, also enhancing sensitivity.
03

Decrease the Length of the Manifold's Tubing

A shorter tubing length reduces the distance the sample travels, which minimizes dispersion and dilution of the analyte. This concentration preservation allows for a more focused signal to be detected, increasing the overall sensitivity of the measurement.
04

Decrease the Diameter of the Manifold's Tubing

Reducing the diameter of the tubing helps diminish sample dispersion by limiting the cross-sectional area in which the analyte can spread. This maintains a higher analyte concentration through the system, resulting in a stronger signal at the detector and therefore better sensitivity.
05

Merge Separate Channels Before Injection

Merging channels before sample injection can improve sensitivity by ensuring a more homogenous mixing of reagents and the sample. This results in a more uniform reaction where the analyte levels can be assessed more accurately, thereby enhancing the sensitivity of the analysis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Analytical Sensitivity Improvement
When it comes to improving the analytical sensitivity of Flow Injection Analysis (FIA), there are several strategies you can utilize. Sensitivity refers to the measurement system's ability to detect small amounts of analyte in a mixture. By enhancing sensitivity, analysis can detect even minute concentrations of a target compound, leading to more reliable and precise results.

Improvements can be achieved through various modifications to the FIA setup and procedure:
  • Larger sample volume injection: Increasing the detected signal by introducing a larger sample volume.
  • Flow rate adjustment: Optimizing the rate at which the sample flows through the system.
  • Manifold tubing dimensions: Altering the size and length of tubing to reduce analyte dispersion.
  • Sample channel merging: Mixing samples and reagents for consistent interactions.
Each method targets a unique aspect of the FIA process, contributing to improved analyte detection and measurement precision.
Sample Injection Volume
Modifying the sample injection volume is a simple yet effective method to enhance sensitivity in FIA. By injecting a larger volume of sample, you directly increase the concentration of the analyte in the detection zone, which means there is a greater quantity of analyte available for the detector to identify.

This boost in concentration strengthens the signal, resulting in more sensitive analysis. It's like turning up the volume on a radio - more of the tune (or in this case, analyte) can be clearly "heard" by the detection system.

It's crucial to remember that too large an increase in volume might not always be ideal, as it could overwhelm the system or lead to unnecessary waste. Efficient balance ensures optimal sensitivity.
Flow Rate Adjustment
The flow rate in FIA systems significantly affects sensitivity. By adjusting this rate, you can control how quickly the sample passes through the apparatus. Increasing the flow rate has the advantage of reducing the time the analyte spends traveling in the system, thereby minimizing its opportunity to disperse.

With less dispersion, the analyte concentration reaching the detector remains high, which in turn produces a more pronounced signal.

However, it's important to find a sweet spot: too fast, and you might miss interactions; too slow, and dispersion dilutes the analyte. Like navigating traffic, maintaining steady flow ensures minimal congestion (or dispersion), leading to optimized sensitivity.
Manifold Tubing Dimensions
Optimizing the manifold tubing dimensions involves tailoring both its length and diameter to improve sensitivity. Shortening the tubing limits the travel distance within the system. This approach minimizes dispersion and prevents dilution of the analyte as it progresses towards the detector, offering a more concentrated signal for detection.

Similarly, a smaller diameter reduces the space available for the analyte to spread, keeping its concentration intact. These modifications work together to maintain a strong analyte presence and yield accurate signals.

Like streamlining a passage to reduce friction, optimizing tubing dimensions ensures the analyte flows swiftly and succinctly, enhancing the system's sensitivity.
Sample Channel Merging
Merging separate sample channels before injection is a strategy that boosts sensitivity by ensuring thorough mixing. When channels converge, they allow for the sample and any necessary reagents to mix more uniformly before analysis begins.

This homogenous mixing enables better interaction between analytes and reagents, fostering consistent reactions. Thus, the improved interaction and uniformity contribute toward a significant improvement in sensitivity as the analyte signal becomes more distinct and pronounced.

Like combining ingredients for a recipe, ensuring even mixing leads to better (or in this case, more sensitive) results. It's an effective way to reduce variability and enhance the accuracy of the FIA method.

Properly managed, channel merging allows for precise and meaningful analytical outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

\({ }^{60} \mathrm{Co}\) is a long-lived isotope \(\left(t_{1 / 2}=5.3 \mathrm{yr}\right)\) frequently used as a radiotracer. The activity in a 5.00 -mL sample of a solution of \({ }^{60} \mathrm{Co}\) is \(2.1 \times 10^{7}\) disintegrations/sec. What is the molar concentration of \({ }^{60} \mathrm{Co}\) in the sample?

Holman, Christian, and Ruzicka described an FIA method to determine the concentration of \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}\) in nonaqueous solvents. \({ }^{28}\) Agarose beads \((22-45 \mu \mathrm{m}\) diameter \()\) with a bonded acid- base indicator are soaked in \(\mathrm{NaOH}\) and immobilized in the detector's flow cell. Samples of \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}\) in \(n\) -butanol are injected into the carrier stream. As a sample passes through the flow cell, an acid-base reaction takes place between \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}\) and \(\mathrm{NaOH}\). The endpoint of the neutralization reaction is signaled by a change in the bound indicator's color and is detected spectrophotometrically. The elution volume needed to reach the titration's endpoint is inversely proportional to the concentration of \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4} ;\) thus, a plot of endpoint volume versus \(\left[\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}\right]^{-1}\) is linear. The following data is typical of that obtained using a set of external standards. $$ \begin{array}{cc} {\left[\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}\right](\mathrm{mM})} & \text { end point volume }(\mathrm{mL}) \\ \hline 0.358 & 0.266 \\ 0.436 & 0.227 \\ 0.560 & 0.176 \\ 0.752 & 0.136 \\ 1.38 & 0.075 \\ 2.98 & 0.037 \\ 5.62 & 0.017 \end{array} $$ What is the concentration of \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}\) in a sample if its endpoint volume is \(0.157 \mathrm{~mL}\) ?

To study the effect of an enzyme inhibitor \(V_{\max }\) and \(K_{m}\) are measured for several concentrations of inhibitor. As the concentration of the inhibitor increases \(V_{\max }\) remains essentially constant, but the value of \(K_{m}\) increases. Which mechanism for enzyme inhibition is in effect?

The enzyme urease catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea. The rate of this reaction is determined for a series of solutions in which the concentration of urea is changed while maintaining a fixed urease concentration of \(5.0 \mu \mathrm{M}\). The following data are obtained. $$ \begin{array}{cc} \text { [urea }](\mu \mathrm{M}) & \text { rate }\left(\mu \mathrm{M} \mathrm{s}^{-1}\right) \\ \hline 0.100 & 6.25 \\ 0.200 & 12.5 \\ 0.300 & 18.8 \\ 0.400 & 25.0 \\ 0.500 & 31.2 \\ 0.600 & 37.5 \\ 0.700 & 43.7 \\ 0.800 & 50.0 \\ 0.900 & 56.2 \\ 1.00 & 62.5 \end{array} $$ Determine the values of \(V_{\max }, k_{2}\), and \(K_{m}\) for urease.

Deming and Pardue studied the kinetics for the hydrolysis of \(p\) -nitrophenyl phosphate by the enzyme alkaline phosphatase. \({ }^{23}\) The reaction's progress was monitored by measuring the absorbance of \(p\) -nitrophenol, which is one of the reaction's products. A plot of the reaction's rate (with units of \(\mu \mathrm{mol} \mathrm{mL}^{-1} \mathrm{sec}^{-1}\) ) versus the volume, \(V\), in milliliters of a serum calibration standard that contained the enzyme, yielded a straight line with the following equation. $$ \text { rate }=2.7 \times 10^{-7} \mu \mathrm{mol} \mathrm{mL}^{-1} \mathrm{~s}^{-1}+\left(3.485 \times 10^{-5} \mu \mathrm{mol} \mathrm{mL}^{-2} \mathrm{~s}^{-1}\right) V $$ A 10.00 -mL sample of serum is analyzed, yielding a rate of \(6.84 \times 10^{-5}\) \(\mu \mathrm{mol} \mathrm{mL}^{-1} \mathrm{sec}^{-1}\). How much more dilute is the enzyme in the serum sample than in the serum calibration standard?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free