Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Janusa and coworkers describe the determination of chloride by CZE. \(^{29}\) Analysis of a series of external standards gives the following calibration curve. $$ \text { area }=-883+5590 \times \text { ppm } \mathrm{Cl}^{-} $$ A standard sample of \(57.22 \% \mathrm{w} / \mathrm{w} \mathrm{Cl}^{-}\) is analyzed by placing \(0.1011-\mathrm{g}\) portions in separate \(100-\mathrm{mL}\) volumetric flasks and diluting to volume. Three unknowns are prepared by pipeting \(0.250 \mathrm{~mL}, 0.500 \mathrm{~mL},\) and \(0.750 \mathrm{~mL}\) of the bulk unknown in separate \(50-\mathrm{mL}\) volumetric flasks and diluting to volume. Analysis of the three unknowns gives areas of \(15310,31546,\) and \(47582,\) respectively. Evaluate the accuracy of this analysis.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The analysis shows chloride concentrations very close to 578 ppm, indicating reasonable accuracy with slight variation.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Chloride Concentration of the Standard

First, we need to determine how much actual chloride is in the standard solution. We start with 0.1011 g of the substance, which is 57.22% chloride by weight. To find the weight of chloride:\[(0.1011 \text{ g}) \times 0.5722 = 0.0578 \text{ g of } Cl^-\]Since the solution is diluted to 100 mL:\[\text{ppm of } Cl^- = \frac{0.0578 \text{ g} \times 1000}{100 \text{ mL}}= 578 \text{ ppm}\]
02

Determine Chloride Concentrations for Each Unknown Solution

We have three samples with different amounts of the bulk unknown and varying volumes. First, calculate the chloride concentration for each unknown based on the given calibration curve.For the first unknown (area = 15310):\[15310 = -883 + 5590 \times \text{ppm }\text{ppm} = \frac{15310 + 883}{5590} = 2.88 \text{ ppm}\]For the second (area = 31546):\[31546 = -883 + 5590 \times \text{ppm}\text{ppm} = \frac{31546 + 883}{5590} = 5.77 \text{ ppm}\]For the third (area = 47582):\[47582 = -883 + 5590 \times \text{ppm}\text{ppm} = \frac{47582 + 883}{5590} = 8.69 \text{ ppm}\]
03

Back-Calculation to Determine Accuracy of Analysis

Use the prepared volumes and resulting concentrations to evaluate the accuracy. Each unknown is made from a bulk unknown, so calculate the relative concentration based on the 50 mL volumetric flask. - For 0.250 mL of bulk: \[\text{ppm}_{\text{bulk}} = 2.88 \text{ ppm} \times \frac{50 \text{ mL}}{0.250 \text{ mL}} = 576 \text{ ppm}\]- For 0.500 mL: \[\text{ppm}_{\text{bulk}} = 5.77 \text{ ppm} \times \frac{50 \text{ mL}}{0.500 \text{ mL}} = 577 \text{ ppm}\]- For 0.750 mL: \[\text{ppm}_{\text{bulk}} = 8.69 \text{ ppm} \times \frac{50 \text{ mL}}{0.750 \text{ mL}} = 579 \text{ ppm}\]Compare against the standard concentration value of 578 ppm. The results show that the method's accuracy is reasonable with slight variation around the expected value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chloride Determination
Chloride determination in capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) relies on understanding the chloride content within a given sample. In this exercise, the sample begins with 0.1011 g containing 57.22% chloride by weight.
By multiplying, we find the actual weight of chloride to be 0.0578 g. Diluting this into 100 mL gives us a chloride concentration of 578 ppm. Chloride determination is integral to various chemical analyses because chloride ions are prevalent in many chemical and biological systems. The goal here is to accurately gauge the presence of these ions within a solution. CZE plays a role by separating ions in a sample, making it easier for analysts to pinpoint the concentration of chloride present. This is crucial for ensuring consistency in operations like food safety testing, water quality assessments, or any process where chloride concentration is monitored.
Calibration Curve
A calibration curve in the context of CZE is a valuable tool for translating experimental data into meaningful analysis outcomes. In this exercise, the calibration curve provided is: \[ \text{area} = -883 + 5590 \times \text{ppm} \ Cl^{-} \]This equation symbolizes the relationship between the measured area in the electrophoresis and the concentration of chloride ions present.
When you know the area, you can calculate ppm, which tells you the parts per million of chloride in your sample.Creating an accurate calibration curve is vital. It requires analysis of standards with known concentrations and plotting the response, such as the area under a peak from an electropherogram. When unknown samples are assessed, their response can be matched to this curve to gauge concentration levels.
  • The calibration curve must be linear over the concentration range of interest for accuracy.
  • Regular checks and recalibrations ensure validity since equipment may drift over time.
Calibration curves are a staple in quantitative analysis, converting data into a form that speaks to real-world concentrations.
Quantitative Analysis
In quantitative analysis, the aim is to determine the quantity or concentration of a substance in a sample. In this case, we're quantitatively analyzing chloride ions using CZE and calibration curve-derived equations.
Using the equation from our calibration curve, we compute the concentrations for unknowns by solving for ppm based on the area values obtained from CZE. Calculations for three samples gave ppm values of 2.88, 5.77, and 8.69 respectively. Such results help identify the bulk unknown's chloride concentration when volumes are back-calculated. Quantitative analysis facilitates the understanding of sample content that is necessary when scrutinizing substances for compliance with regulatory standards.
  • Exactness is pivotal; even small inaccuracies can lead to significant deviations in critical fields like pharmaceuticals or environmental monitoring.
  • It links experimental data to tangible quantities much needed for reliable and usable results.
It's about transforming qualitative observations into numbers we can compare, evaluate, and rely upon.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Moody studied the efficiency of a GC separation of 2 -butanone on a dinonyl phthalate packed column. \(^{16}\) Evaluating plate height as a function of flow rate gave a van Deemter equation for which \(A\) is \(1.65 \mathrm{~mm}\), \(B\) is \(25.8 \mathrm{~mm} \cdot \mathrm{mL} \min ^{-1},\) and \(C\) is \(0.0236 \mathrm{~mm} \cdot \min \mathrm{mL}^{-1}\) (a) Prepare a graph of \(H\) versus \(u\) for flow rates between \(5-120 \mathrm{~mL} / \mathrm{min}\). (b) For what range of flow rates does each term in the Van Deemter equation have the greatest effect? (c) What is the optimum flow rate and the corresponding height of a theoretical plate? (d) For open-tubular columns the \(A\) term no longer is needed. If the \(B\) and \(C\) terms remain unchanged, what is the optimum flow rate and the corresponding height of a theoretical plate? (e) Compared to the packed column, how many more theoretical plates are in the open-tubular column?

The concentrations of \(\mathrm{Cl}^{-}, \mathrm{NO}_{3}^{-},\) and \(\mathrm{SO}_{4}^{2-}\) are determined by ion chromatography. A \(50-\mu \mathrm{L}\) standard sample of \(10.0 \mathrm{ppm} \mathrm{Cl}^{-}, 2.00 \mathrm{ppm}\) \(\mathrm{NO}_{3}^{-},\) and \(5.00 \mathrm{ppm} \mathrm{SO}_{4}^{2-}\) gave signals (in arbitrary units) of \(59.3,\) \(16.1,\) and 6.08 respectively. A sample of effluent from a wastewater treatment plant is diluted tenfold and a \(50-\mu \mathrm{L}\) portion gives signals of 44.2 for \(\mathrm{Cl}^{-}, 2.73\) for \(\mathrm{NO}_{3}^{-},\) and 5.04 for \(\mathrm{SO}_{4}^{2-} .\) Report the parts per million for each anion in the effluent sample.

A series of polyvinylpyridine standards of different molecular weight was analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography, yielding the following results. \begin{tabular}{cc} formula weight & retention volume (mL) \\ \hline 600000 & 6.42 \\ 100000 & 7.98 \\ 20000 & 9.30 \\ 3000 & 10.94 \end{tabular} When a preparation of polyvinylpyridine of unknown formula weight is analyzed, the retention volume is \(8.45 \mathrm{~mL}\). Report the average formula weight for the preparation.

Haddad and associates report the following retention factors for the reversed- phase separation of salicylamide and caffeine. \({ }^{25}\) \(\begin{array}{ccccccc}\% \text { methanol } & 30 \% & 35 \% & 40 \% & 45 \% & 50 \% & 55 \% \\ k_{\text {sal }} & 2.4 & 1.6 & 1.6 & 1.0 & 0.7 & 0.7 \\\ k_{\text {caff }} & 4.3 & 2.8 & 2.3 & 1.4 & 1.1 & 0.9\end{array}\) (a) Explain the trends in the retention factors for these compounds. (b) What is the advantage of using a mobile phase with a smaller \(\% \mathrm{v} / \mathrm{v}\) methanol? Are there any disadvantages?

The composition of a multivitamin tablet is determined using an HPLC with a diode array UV/Vis detector. A \(5-\mu L\) standard sample that contains 170 ppm vitamin C, 130 ppm niacin, 120 ppm niacinamide, 150 ppm pyridoxine, 60 ppm thiamine, 15 ppm folic acid, and 10 ppm riboflavin is injected into the HPLC, giving signals (in arbitrary units) of, respectively, \(0.22,1.35,0.90,1.37,0.82,0.36,\) and \(0.29 .\) The multivitamin tablet is prepared for analysis by grinding into a powder and transferring to a \(125-\mathrm{mL}\) Erlenmeyer flask that contains \(10 \mathrm{~mL}\) of \(1 \%\) \(\mathrm{v} / \mathrm{v} \mathrm{N} \mathrm{H}_{3}\) in dimethyl sulfoxide. After sonicating in an ultrasonic bath for \(2 \mathrm{~min}, 90 \mathrm{~mL}\) of \(2 \%\) acetic acid is added and the mixture is stirred for \(1 \mathrm{~min}\) and sonicated at \(40^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) for \(5 \mathrm{~min}\). The extract is then filtered through a \(0.45-\mu \mathrm{m}\) membrane filter. Injection of a \(5-\mu \mathrm{L}\) sample into the HPLC gives signals of 0.87 for vitamin C, 0.00 for niacin, 1.40 for niacinamide, 0.22 for pyridoxine, 0.19 for thiamine, 0.11 for folic acid, and 0.44 for riboflavin. Report the milligrams of each vitamin present in the tablet.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free