Chapter 20: Problem 13
Atomic numbers of \(\mathrm{Cr}\) and \(\mathrm{Fe}\) are respectively 25 and 26\. Which of the following is paramagnetic due to the spin of the electron? (a) \(\left[\mathrm{Cr}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{6}\right]^{3+}\) (b) \(\left[\mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{CO})_{5}\right]\) (c) \(\left[\mathrm{Cr}(\mathrm{CO})_{6}\right]\) (d) \(\left[\mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{CN})_{6}\right]^{4}\)
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Determine Electron Configuration
Analyze Coordination Compounds
Examine Each Complex for Paramagnetic Property
Identify Paramagnetic Species
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Electron Configuration
Iron, with an atomic number of 26, has the configuration \( [\text{Ar}] 3d^6 4s^2 \). Here, six electrons are in the 3d subshell, and two electrons fill the 4s subshell post-Argon. By analyzing these configurations, we can determine where electrons are likely unpaired, which relates directly to magnetic properties.
When atoms form coordination compounds, the electron configuration may change depending on the ligands' influence.
Coordination Compounds
A key concept in studying coordination compounds is the geometrical arrangement, such as octahedral or tetrahedral structures, formed by the ligands around the metal center. In an octahedral complex, the ligands can split the d orbitals into two distinct energy levels, known as \( t_{2g} \) and \( e_g \).
Ligands significantly affect the metal center's electron configuration. Strong field ligands, like CN^- and NH3, can cause considerable splitting of energy levels in d orbitals, leading to differences in electron pairing. Understanding these properties helps us predict the compound's magnetic behavior and electronic properties.
Strong Field Ligands
In contexts where the ligand field is strong, such as with CO and CN^-, the large energy difference usually results in paired electrons, leading to low-spin states. This occurs because the energy required to pair up electrons is less than the energy gap between the \( t_{2g} \) and \( e_g \) orbitals under strong fields. This plays a crucial role in determining the magnetic properties of coordination compounds.
- NH3, often seen as an intermediate or strong field ligand, can lead to paramagnetism in cases like \( [\text{Cr}(\text{NH}_3)_6]^{3+} \). Here, the splitting allows some unpaired electrons despite the field's relative strength.
- Other ligands like CO cause more significant splitting, resulting in paired electrons and non-paramagnetic properties.
Unpaired Electrons
For example, in \( [\text{Cr}(\text{NH}_3)_6]^{3+} \), chromium maintains a \( 3d^3 \) configuration with three unpaired electrons, rendering the complex paramagnetic. The absence of unpaired electrons results in diamagnetic behavior, where the material is slightly repelled by magnetic fields.
- To identify unpaired electrons, examine the electron configuration of the metal center in the complex.
- Consider the ligand field's influence on electron pairing and orbital splitting.
- The presence or absence of unpaired electrons not only impacts magnetism but also affects the compound's color and reactivity.