Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The text points out that asymmetric information can have deleterious effects on market outcomes.

a. Explain how asymmetric information about a hidden action or a hidden characteristic can lead to moral hazard or adverse selection.

b. Discuss a few tactics that managers can use to overcome these problems.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. When any of both parties in a transaction holds the information or attributes that are necessary for the other party to make a decision, it then results in an unfavorable selection process. Moral hazard situations, on the other hand, emerge when one of the negotiating parties hides actions in order to earn profits.
  1. To avoid the situation of moral hazard, companies and employers enter into a contract in which one of the parties, mainly the employees, promises to protect the other from financial harm. Managers have established signalling and screening systems to enable them to give better information to the customer or other party involved in the transaction in the case of unfavourable selection.

Step by step solution

01

Define Asymmetric Information

"Asymmetric information" refers to when one party to a transaction has more information than the other. Asymmetric information, when one party has more knowledge about the goods being sold than the other, makes it possible for sellers to exploit buyers in some situations.

02

Explanation on how asymmetric information about a hidden action or a hidden characteristic can lead to moral hazard or adverse selection 

Asymmetric information occurs when one of the parties in a transaction has better information than the other parties, creating a situation of advantage and disadvantage that can cause the party without information to refuse to complete the transaction, resulting in economic losses and profit reduction.

Hidden qualities cause unfavorable selection processes when one of the two parties in a transaction withholds information or traits that are required for the other party to make a decision. These scenarios commonly arise during the recruiting process, when the company or employer cannot be certain of the traits and talents of the applicant.

Moral hazard scenarios, on the other hand, occur when one of the parties to a negotiation conceals acts in order to make a profit. For example, if I decide to sell my old automobile to someone else without commenting or omitting mechanical faults from the buyer, I will be concealing facts that might influence the buyer's decision or reduce the values.

Therefore, when one of the two parties in a transaction withholds information or attributes that are essential for the other side to make a choice, it results in unfavorable selection processes.

Moral hazard situations, on the other hand, emerge when one of the negotiating parties hides actions in order to profit.

03

Discussing a few tactics that managers can use to overcome these problems.

Businesses and employers can sign in to a contract where one of the parties, frequently the employee, promises to protect the other from financial harm as a way to minimise moral hazard. Contract-bound managers could not care whether the company makes a profit or not because they will still be paid a salary. If a firm's objectives aren't met, contracts provide the company with the right to terminate an employee's services.

Managers have developed signalling and screening procedures that allow them to provide the customer or other party involved in the transaction with greater information in the case of unfavourable selection. When it comes to products, the managers make an effort to highlight critical details like certifications and approval from medical organisations, the release date, a money-back guarantee, or other aspects that enable the client to learn more about the products.

Because of this, businesses and employers may engage in a contract where one party, often the employee, undertakes to shield the other from financial harm in order to avoid moral hazards.

In the event of a poor pick, managers have built signalling and screening systems to enable them to provide the consumer or other parties engaged with the transaction with better information.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Congress enacted the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) to potentially help millions of employees gain access to group health insurance. The key provision of HIPAA requires insurance companies and health insurance plans administered by employers who self-insure to provide all employees access to health insurance regardless of previous medical conditions. This provision is known as โ€œguaranteed issueโ€ and is a controversial topic in the insurance industry. Explain why this is controversial legislation.

Question: Prosecutors representing the Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced criminal charges against thirteen individuals for engaging in insider trading. According to the SECโ€™s director of enforcement, a trading ring acting on inside information โ€œcompromises the marketsโ€™ integrity and investorsโ€™ trust. . . .โ€ Explain why.

Life insurance policies typically have clauses stipulating the insurance company will not pay claims arising from suicide for a specified termโ€”typically two years from the date the policy was issued. Use precise economic terminology to explain the likely impact on an insurance companyโ€™s bottom line if it were to eliminate such a clause.

Your store sells an item desired by a consumer. The consumer is using an optimal search strategy; the accompanying graph shows the consumerโ€™s expected benefits and costs of searching for a lower price.

a. What is the consumerโ€™s reservation price?

b. If your price is \(3and the consumer visits your store, will she purchase the item or continue to search? Explain.

c. Suppose the consumerโ€™s cost of each search rises to \)16. What is the highest price you can charge and still sell the item to the consumer if she visits your store?

d. Suppose the consumerโ€™s cost of each search falls to \(2. If the consumer finds a store charging \)3, will she purchase at that price or continue to search?

This past year, Used Imported Autos sold very few cars and lost over$500,000 . As a consequence, its manager is contemplating two strategies to increase its sales volume. The low-cost strategy involves changing the dealership name to Quality Used Imported Autos to signal to customers that the company sells high-quality cars. The high-cost strategy involves issuing a 10-point auto inspection on all used cars on the lot and offering consumers a30 -day warranty on every used car sold. Which of these two strategies do you think would have the greatest impact on sales volume? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free