Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

1.Use the following payoff matrix for a one-shot game to answer the accompanying question.

a. Determine the Nash equilibrium outcomes that arise if the players make decisions independently, simultaneously, and without any communication. Which of these outcomes would you consider most likely? Explain.

b. Suppose player 1 is permitted to “communicate” by uttering one syllable before the players simultaneously and independently make their decisions. What should player 1 utter, and what outcome do you think would occur as a result?

c. Suppose player 2 can choose its strategy before player 1, that player 1 observes player 2’s choice before making her decision, and that this move structure is known by both players. What outcome would you expect? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Strategy A, X (25,25) and strategy B, Y (15,15)
  2. (25,25).
  3. The maximum possible payoff is (25.25)

Step by step solution

01

To Finding the Nash equilibria 

On the payoff matrix for a one-shot game with two players who establish their decision independently, simultaneously and without any information about the opponent, we can establish two Nash equilibria.

  • If Player 1 chooses option A, Player 2 will choose option X, otherwise he would lose. Therefore, in this strategy A, X (25,25) will be the first Nash equilibrium since it is the most optimal decision for both players.
  • If Player 1 chooses B, Player 2's best option will be to choose Y. Similarly in this strategy both players have the highest possible payoff.Therefore, the strategy B, Y (15,15) will be the second Nash equilibrium.

Given that the players do not have any type of contact or know the other's move, the safest and most reliable decision is the second Nash equilibrium with strategy B, Y(15,15). Here, both players obtain benefits, since on equilibrium A, X one of the players can cheat and generate losses to the rival player.

02

Finding the result outcome

  1. If player 1 is allowed to communicate with player 2 using a single syllable, he must say 'A' if he seeks to obtain the highest payoff possible. The player 2 already knows that player 1 will choose A, so he can choose option X and obtain the highest payoff. Thus, we obtain a Nash equilibrium where both players obtain (25,25).
03

Finding the expected outcome

If Player 2 can make his decision before Player 1 but Player 1 can see Player 2's strategy, we will be in the presence of a backward induction Nash equilibrium where the last decision will be observed and based on this the first decision will be made.

Therefore, Player 2 will choose option X in which he has a maximum payoff, and Player I, observing this, will choose option A which also generates the maximum possible payoff (25.25). Thus, this condition is generating a perfect subgame in the Nash equilibrium.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Price comparison services on the Internet (as well as “shopbots”) are a popular way for retailers to advertise their products and a convenient way for consumers to simultaneously obtain price quotes from several firms selling an identical product. Suppose that you are the manager of Digital Camera, Inc., a firm that specializes in selling digital cameras to consumers that advertises with an Internet price comparison service. In the market for one particular high-end camera, you have only one rival firm—The Camera Shop—with which you’ve competed for the last four years by setting prices day after day. Being savvy entrepreneurs, the ease of using the Internet to monitor rival firms’ prices has enabled you and your rival to charge extremely high prices for this particular camera. In a recent newspaper article, you read that The Camera Shop has exhausted its venture capital and that no new investors are willing to sink money into the company. As a result, The Camera Shop will discontinue its operations next month. Will this information alter your pricing decisions today? Explain.

9. Use the following payoff matrix to answer the following questions.

Suppose this is a one-shot game:

a. Determine the dominant strategy for each player. If such strategies do not exist, explain why not.

b. Determine the secure strategy for each player. If such strategies do not exist, explain why not.

c. Determine the Nash equilibrium of this game. If such an equilibrium does not exist, explain why not

Use the following payoff matrix for a simultaneous-move one-shot game to answer the accompanying questions

a. What is player 1’s optimal strategy? Why?

b. Determine player 1’s equilibrium payoff.

While there is a degree of differentiation among general merchandise retailers like Target and Kmart, weekly newspaper circulars announcing sales provide evidence that these firms engage in price competition. This suggests that Target and Kmart simultaneously choose to announce one of two prices for a given product: a regular price or a sale price. Suppose that when one firm announces the sale price and the other announces the regular price for a particular product, the firm announcing the sale price attracts50million extra customers to earn a profit of \(7billion, compared to the \)4billion earned by the firm announcing the regular price. When both firms announce the sale price, the two firms split the market equally (each getting an extrarole="math" localid="1657018179629" 25million customers) to earn profits of \(2billion each. When both firms announce the regular price, each company attracts only its 50 million loyal customers and the firms each earn \)4billion in profits. If you were in charge of pricing at one of these firms, would you have a clear-cut pricing strategy? If so, explain why. If not, explain why not and propose a mechanism that might solve your dilemma. (Hint: Unlike Walmart, neither of these two firms guarantees “Everyday low prices.”)

You manage a company that competes in an industry that is comprised of five equal-sized firms. A recent industry report indicates that a tariff on foreign imports would boost industry profits by \(30 million—and that it would only take \)5 million in expenditures on (legal) lobbying activities to induce Congress to implement such a tariff. Discuss your strategy for improving your company’s profits

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free