Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

You are the manager of the only firm worldwide that specializes in exporting fish products to Japan. Your firm competes against a handful of Japanese firms that enjoy a significant first-mover advantage. Recently, one of your Japanese customers has called to inform you that the Japanese legislature is considering imposing a quota that would reduce the number of pounds of fish products you are permitted to ship to Japan each year. Your first instinct is to call the trade representative of your country to lobby against the import quota. Is following through with your first instinct necessarily the best decision? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

If the quota to be established is less than our profit maximizing quantity, the instinct to call the trade representative of our country to lobby against the Japanese import quota should be followed.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Japanese companies having the first move advantage will impose a strategy that maximizes their profits and seeks to eliminate the competition. As the only foreign firm that exports fish to Japan, we face a new legislature that seeks to impose a maximum annual export quota of fish to this country.

02

Explanation

We are faced with a decision- lobby or not against this legislation. The first thing to keep in mind is that lobbying leads to legal expenses that can compromise the firm's profits and there is no guarantee that Japanese authorities will reverse or improve the terms of this new legislature.

Another alternative is not to lobby and analyze whether the proposed annual fee is higher or lower than our export level that maximizes our profit.

For example, the legislature establishes a maximum annual fish export quota of 1,000 tons and our profit maximizing quantity is 800 tons, it makes no sense to establish a lobby with the Japanese government.

Therefore, if the quota to be established is less than our profit maximizing quantity, the instinct to call the trade representative of our country to lobby against the Japanese import quota should be followed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

During the 1980s, most of the worldโ€™s supply of lysine was produced by a Japanese company named Ajinomoto. Lysine is an essential amino acid that is an important livestock feed component. At this time, the United States imported most of the worldโ€™s supply of lysineโ€”more than30,000tonsโ€”to use in livestock feed at a price of\(1.65per pound. The worldwide market for lysine, however, fundamentally changed in1991when U.S.-based Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) began producing lysineโ€”a move that doubled worldwide production capacity. Experts conjectured that Ajinomoto and ADM had similar cost structures and that the marginal cost of producing and distributing lysine was approximately \)0.70per pound. Despite ADMโ€™s entry into the lysine market, suppose demand remained constant atQ=208-80P(in millions of pounds). Shortly after ADM began producing lysine, the worldwide price dropped to \(0.70. By,1993 however, the price of lysine shot back up to\)1.65. Use the theories discussed in this chapter to provide a potential explanation for what happened in the lysine market. Support your answer with appropriate calculations.

The opening statement on the website of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) says its members seek โ€œ to secure an efficient, economic and regular supply of petroleum to consumers, a steady income to producers and a fair return on capital for those investing in the petroleum industry.โ€ To achieve this goal, OPEC attempts to coordinate and unify petroleum policies by raising or lowering its membersโ€™ collective oil production. However, increased production by Russia, Oman, Mexico, Norway, and other non-OPEC countries has placed downward pressure on the price of crude oil. To achieve its goal of stable and fair oil prices, what must OPEC do to maintain the price of oil at its desired level? Do you think this will be easy for OPEC to do? Explain.

The inverse demand for a homogeneous-product Stackelberg duopoly is P 16,000- 4Q. The cost structures for the leader and the follower, respectively, are CL (QL)localid="1657080008156" 4,000QL and CF (QF)6,000QF.

a. What is the followerโ€™s reaction function?

b. Determine the equilibrium output level for both the leader and the follower.

c. Determine the equilibrium market price.

d. Determine the profits of the leader and the follower.

The market for a standard-sized cardboard container consists of two firms: Composite Box and fiber board. As the manager of Composite Box, you enjoy a patented technology that permits your company to produce boxes faster and at a lower cost than fiber board. You use this advantage to be the first to choose its profit-maximizing output level in the market. The inverse demand function for boxes is P1,2006Q, Composite Boxโ€™s costs are CC(QC)60QC, and fiber boardโ€™s costs are CF (QF)120QF. Ignoring antitrust considerations, would it be profitable for your firm to merge with fiber board? If not, explain why not; if so, put together an offer that would permit you to profitably complete the merger

The Hull Petroleum Company and Inverted V are retail gasoline franchises that compete in a local market to sell gasoline to consumers. Hull and Inverted V are located across the street from each other and can observe the prices posted on each otherโ€™s marquees. Demand for gasoline in this market is Q806P, and both franchises obtain gasoline from their supplier at $2.20per gallon. On the day that both franchises opened for business, each owner was observed changing the price of gasoline advertised on its marquee more than 10 times; the owner of Hull lowered its price to slightly undercut Inverted Vโ€™s price, and the owner of Inverted V lowered its advertised price to beat Hullโ€™s price. Since then, prices appear to have stabilized. Under current conditions, how many gallons of gasoline are sold in the market, and at what price? Would your answer differ if Hull had service attendants available to fill consumersโ€™ tanks but Inverted V was only a self-service station?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free