Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Assess whether a firm’s profits can be enhanced by changing the timing of decisions or the order of strategic moves and whether doing so creates first- or second-mover advantages.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Firms can enhance profits by changing the timing of decisions, creating a first-mover advantage.

Step by step solution

01

 First- Mover Advantage

The first-mover firm gets an additional advantage by capturing the market through higher output commitment than the new entrant.

Changing order of strategic moves:

This situation can be understood through a situation where two firms, A and B, choose their strategies accordingly, which can be understood through a game of dominant strategy.

Here, Firm A, the first mover, will choose low output as it will gain $30On the other hand, Firm B will choose high output for $20. Thus, we can conclude that the optimum condition would be A with a profit of $10and B of $20.

Changing the timing of decisions:

Let us consider a sequential game where Firm Agets to choose before Firm B.From the above game tree, we can see that if Ais the first mover, chooses low output, and if Bchooses high output, then the net outcome would be Areceiving $10On the other hand, if AChooses high output, then Firm Bhas the only choice of opting for low output with profits of $5Thus, one can see that Firm B has to face the disadvantages of being the second mover.

02

 Second-Mover Advantage

Although we can see that first-movers have comparative advantages over the second-mover, second-movers have some advantages based on particular situations.

If the second mover produces a new product after the first mover, then the former can earn more significant pay-offs than the latter if it free rides on the first mover's investment.

Moreover, a second-mover has the more significant advantage of learning from the mistakes of the first-mover. In such cases, the second mover can produce better cost-effect products than the first mover.

Thus, one can understand that both strategies can enhance profits.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Identify examples of networks and network externalities, and determine the number of connections possible in a star network with n users.

Question:23. Evaluate the following: "Since a rival's profit-maximizing price and output depend on its marginal cost and not its fixed costs, a firm cannot profitably lessen competition by implementing a strategy that raises its rival's fixed costs."

A monopolist earns 30\( million annually and will maintain that level of profit indefinitely, provided that no other firm enters the market. However, if another firm enters the market, the monopolist will earn 30\) million in the current period and 15\( million annually thereafter. The opportunity cost of funds is 10 percent, and profits in each period are realized at the beginning of each period.

a. What is the present value of the monopolist's current and future earnings if entry occurs?

b. If the monopolist can earn 16\) million indefinitely by limit pricing, should it do so? Explain.

Two firms compete in a homogeneous product market where the inverse demand function is P=205Q(quantity is measured in millions). Firm 1has been in business for one year, while firm 2just recently entered the market. Each firm has a legal obligation to pay one year’s rent of S2million regardless of its production decision. Firm 1’s marginal cost is S2, and firm 2’s marginal cost is S10. The current market price is S15and was set optimally last year when firm 1was the only firm in the market. At present, each firm has a 50percent share of the market.

a. Why do you think firm1’s marginal cost is lower than firm2’s marginal cost?

b. Determine the current profits of the two firms.

c. What would happen to each firm’s current profits if firm1reduced its price toS10while firm2continued to chargeS15?

d. Suppose that, by cutting its price toS10, firm1is able to drive firm2completely out of the market. After firm2exits the market, does firm1have an incentive to raise its price? Explain.

e. Is firm1engaging in predatory pricing when it cuts its price fromS15toS10? Explain.

Question:18. Argyle is a large, vertically integrated firm that manufactures sweaters from a rare type of wool produced on its sheep farms. Argyle has adopted a strategy of selling wool to companies that compete against it in the market forsweaters. Explain why this strategy may, in fact, be rational. Also, identify at least two other strategies that might permit Argyle to earn higher profits.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free