Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show how a manager can profitably lessen competition by raising rivals' costs.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The manager can raise rival costs by increasing their marginal cost, fixing or implementing foreclosure or price-cost squeezing strategies

Step by step solution

01

Consequences of raising rival’s cost

Raising the cost of the rivals, the manager can distort their incentives to decide, thus influencing their prices, output, and the decision to enter the market. If implementing such action requires a small cost, then the manager will accept such strategies to increase their profits at the expense of other firms.

02

Strategies Implemented

  1. Involving marginal cost:

Let firm 1 uses business tactics to increase the marginal cost of the rival firm 2. Thus, the rival firm will now produce less output, and the price will increase in the market. On the other hand, firm 1 takes advantage and increases its output, thus increasing its market share and profits.

  1. Involving fixed cost:

Suppose firm one lobby for regulation that adopts a license to operate in the market whose cost is greater than the fixed cost of the entrant. Thus, changing the incentives of the possible entrant. Hence, firm one will continue to control the market without any interference.

  1. Involving vertically integrated firm:

Through the process of vertical foreclosure, the firm refuses to sell inputs to the downstream firms. Thus, it forces them to go for inefficient substitutes, which increases their cost of production, forcing the rivals to exit the market.

The price-cost squeeze strategy followed by the firm induces the firm to increase the input costs of the rivals. Thus, it keeps the output price constant, which drives them out of the market as their cost is greater than the revenue generated from the market.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain the economic basis for predatory pricing.

Between 1995 and 1997, American Airlines competed with several other low-cost carriers at Dallas / Fort Worth Airport. In response to these low-cost carriers, American Airlines has reduced fares and increased services on some routes. As a result, one of the low-cost carriers has stopped operating and urged American Airlines to raise prices. Why do you think the proceedings were filed against American Airlines? Why do you think American Airlines won in the process?

Question:21. By the end of 1995 , Netscape's share of the browser market grew to 90 percent by continually upgrading its product to include new features such as e-mail and video capabilities. Shortly thereafter, Microsoft introduced and distributed a new version of its operating system that included its Internet Explorer browser at no cost. In addition, Microsoft allegedly imposed several restrictions on original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), Internet service providers (ISPs), and Internet content providers (ICPs) with the intention of (a) ensuring that almost every new computer had a version of Internet Explorer (IE) and (b) making it more difficult for consumers to get Netscape on new computers. On May 18,1998 , the government filed a complaint in District Court against Microsoft. Based on what you have learned in this chapter, briefly discuss the merits (if any) of the government's complaint against Microsoft.

During the early days of the Internet, most dot-coms were driven by revenues rather than profits. A large number were even driven by โ€œhitsโ€ to their site rather than revenues. This all changed in early 2000, however, when the prices of unprofitable dot-com stocks plummeted on Wall Street. Most analysts have attributed this to a return to rationality, with investors focusing once again on fundamentals like earnings growth. Does this mean that, during the 1990s, dot-coms that focused on โ€œhitsโ€ rather than revenues or profits had bad business plans? Explain.

Bank 1 and Bank 2 are considering entering a compatibility agreement that would permit the users of each bank's ATMs access to the other bank's ATMs. Bank 1 has a network of branches and automated teller machines (ATMs) extending from Connecticut to Florida. Bank 1 's 12 million customers currently have access only to the 10,000 ATMs solely owned by the company on the East Coast. While Bank 2's core account holders are located on the West Coast and southwestern portion of the United States, the company is expanding to the East Coast. Bank 2 has 15 million customers who can use any of its 14,000 ATMs. Using the idea of network externalities, describe how such an agreement between Bank 1 and Bank 2 would benefit consumers.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free