Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

During the early days of the Internet, most dot-coms were driven by revenues rather than profits. A large number were even driven by “hits” to their site rather than revenues. This all changed in early 2000, however, when the prices of unprofitable dot-com stocks plummeted on Wall Street. Most analysts have attributed this to a return to rationality, with investors focusing once again on fundamentals like earnings growth. Does this mean that, during the 1990s, dot-coms that focused on “hits” rather than revenues or profits had bad business plans? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Many dot com companies, such as eBay, Amazon, Microsoft, Qualcomm, and Cisco, have survived, implying that dot com companies did not necessarily focus solely on hits rather than a business plan with an adequate pricing strategy. The nature of this business necessitates focusing on web page traffic and the number of clients that can be secured to obtain income and benefits in the long run.

Step by step solution

01

Define business strategy

Business strategy may be defined as a plan of action or a series of decisions that helps entrepreneurs achieve specific business goals. It is nothing more than a master plan that a company's management adopts to maintain a competitive position in the market, continue operations, please customers, and achieve its goals.

02

Explanation

The dot com crisis, which occurred in the late 1990sand 2000searly, was caused by dotcom or internet-based businesses' speculation, particularly in the NASDAQ Composite index market, which rose to587 percent from 1995to 2000and then experienced a 75percent drop in mid-2000, eroding all profits and driving many out of the market.

One of the reasons for the formation and subsequent burst of this bubble was that technology companies focused on Hits. These are associated with attracting customers and increasing traffic to their websites rather than developing and following a business plan with an appropriate pricing strategy that could generate long-term profits.

The excitement generated by these dot com firms resulted in scandalous values with bloated predicted earnings, earnings estimates, and industrial analysis, profitability, the P/E ratio. Thus, market trend analyses were all ignored.

However, many companies such as eBay, Amazon, Microsoft, Qualcomm, and Cisco survived because they did not necessarily focus on hits. Instead, they focused on a business plan with an adequate pricing strategy. The nature of this business necessitates focusing on web page traffic and the number of clients that can be secured to obtain income and benefits in the long run.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the following game, determine the maximum amount you would be willing to pay for the privilege of moving (a) first, (b) second, or (c) third: There are three players, you and two rivals. The player announcing the largest integer gets a payoff of S10, that announcing the second largest integer gets S0, and that announcing the third largest integer gets S5.

Explain why networks often lead to first-mover advantages, and how to use strategies such as penetration pricing to favorably change the strategic environment.

Two firms compete in a homogeneous product market where the inverse demand function is P=205Q(quantity is measured in millions). Firm 1has been in business for one year, while firm 2just recently entered the market. Each firm has a legal obligation to pay one year’s rent of S2million regardless of its production decision. Firm 1’s marginal cost is S2, and firm 2’s marginal cost is S10. The current market price is S15and was set optimally last year when firm 1was the only firm in the market. At present, each firm has a 50percent share of the market.

a. Why do you think firm1’s marginal cost is lower than firm2’s marginal cost?

b. Determine the current profits of the two firms.

c. What would happen to each firm’s current profits if firm1reduced its price toS10while firm2continued to chargeS15?

d. Suppose that, by cutting its price toS10, firm1is able to drive firm2completely out of the market. After firm2exits the market, does firm1have an incentive to raise its price? Explain.

e. Is firm1engaging in predatory pricing when it cuts its price fromS15toS10? Explain.

The CEO of a regional airline recently learned that its only competitor is suffering from a significant cash-flow constraint. The CEO realizes that its competitor’s days are numbered, but has asked whether you would recommend the carrier significantly lower its airfares to “speed up the rival’s exit from the market.” Provide your recommendation.

Assess whether a firm’s profits can be enhanced by changing the timing of decisions or the order of strategic moves and whether doing so creates first- or second-mover advantages.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free