Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Two firms compete in a Cournot fashion. Firm 1 successfully engages in an activity that raises its rival's marginal cost of production.

a. Provide two examples of activities that might raise rivals' marginal costs.

b. In order for such strategies to be beneficial, is it necessary for the manager of firm 1 to enjoy hurting the rival? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

For these strategies to be beneficial, Firm 1 does not need to hurt its rival when making decisions to increase marginal costs. This can be justified by the fact that firm 1 is not damaging or affecting the reputation of firm 2 through unfair practices

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

One of the strategies that the managers of some companies that have some market control to increase or maintain their profitability is to increase the costs of rival companies. It causes the incentives to enter or keeping the same level of production to be distorted.

02

To define Cournot competition model

The Cournot competition model is an imperfect competition model in which two companies with identical cost functions compete with homogeneous goods in a static environment. One of the strategies that Firm 1 can adopt is to increase the rival's distribution costs, which will reduce its profits. For example, if a Software company decides to restrict the distribution of rival software to computer companies like Lenovo, Acer and Asus, This will increase the rival's marginal costs.

A second strategy that the firm can adopt is to increase the input price. By modifying its production, Firm 1 can influence the market price and cause firm 2's variable costs to increase and, therefore, to increase marginal costs.

03

To find the necessary things for the manager of firm

For these strategies to be beneficial, Firm 1 does not need to hurt its rival when making decisions to increase marginal costs. This can be justified by the fact that firm 1 is not damaging or affecting the reputation of firm 2 through unfair practices. What it seeks is to modify price levels so that marginal costs increase and production is reduced, while firm 1 will take advantage of this scenario to increase production and take advantage of the rise in prices to obtain greater benefits.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A potential entrant can produce at the same cost as the monopolist illustrated in the figure below. The monopolistโ€™s demand curve is given by D M, and its average cost curve is AC.

  1. What level of output does the monopolist have to produce in order for the entrant to face the residual demand curve, DR?
  2. How much profit will the monopolist earn if it commits to the output that generates the residual demand curve, DR?
  3. Can the monopolist profitably deter entry by committing to a different level of output? Explain.

Question:17. During the dot-com era, mergers among some brokerage houses resulted in the acquiring firm paying a premium on the order of $100 for each of the acquired firm's customers. Is there a business rationale for such a strategy? Do you think these circumstances are met in the brokerage business? Explain.

Identify examples of networks and network externalities, and determine the number of connections possible in a star network with n users.

Explain the economic basis for limit pricing, and identify the conditions under which a firm can profit from such a strategy. Try these

Barnacle Industries was awarded a patent over 15 years ago for a unique industrial-strength cleaner that removes barnacles and other particles from the hulls of ships. Thanks to its monopoly position, Barnacle has earned more than \(160 million over the past decade. Its customers-spanning the gamut from cruise lines to freighters-use the product because it reduces their fuel bills. The annual (inverse) demand function for Barnacle's product is given by P=400-.0005 Q, and Barnacle's cost function is given by C(Q)=250 Q. Thanks to subsidies stemming from an energy bill passed by Congress nearly two decades ago, Barnacle does not have any fixed costs: The federal government essentially pays for the plant and capital equipment required to make this energy-saving product. Absent this subsidy, Barnacle's fixed costs would be about \)4 million annually. Knowing that the company's patent will soon expire, Marge, Barnacle's manager, is concerned that entrants will qualify for the subsidy, enter the market, and produce a perfect substitute at an identical cost. With interest rates at 7 percent, Marge is considering a limit-pricing strategy. If you were Marge, what strategy would you pursue? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free