Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that, prior to other firms entering the market, the maker of a new smartphone (Way Cool, Inc.) earns million per year. By reducing its price by 60 percent, Way Cool could discourage entry into "its" market, but doing so would cause its profits to sink to million. By pricing such that other firms would be able to enter the market, Way Cool's profits would drop to million for the indefinite future. In light of these estimates, do you think it is profitable for Way Cool to engage in limit pricing? Is any additional information needed to formulate an answer to this question? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Decision not to adopt limit pricing technique is rational.

ΠL=1+iiπL

ΠMD=πM+πdi

Step by step solution

01

Limit pricing strategy

For the limit pricing strategy of the monopoly smartphone company Way Cool, Inc to be optimal, the present value of profits under limit pricing need to be greater than the present value if new competitors are allowed to enter in which:

ΠL>ΠMD Where,

ΠL:are the expected benefit of the limit pricing strategy.

ΠMD:are the expected benefit with the entry of new rivals.

02

To find the limit pricing strategy

To determine which decision combines, the equations for ΠL and ΠMD must be reorganized, which are the following -

ΠL=1+iiπL

ΠMD=πM+πdi

Rearranging the above equations

πL-πDi>πM-πL

By substituting the data, we get

230i>80(2)

03

Finding the limit pricing and entry

The equations for limit pricing and entry indicate the current profit as a monopolistic profit ($80million). In this case, the loss that would be obtained if the limit price is established as a strategy (- $2 million). The indefinite reduction in the company's profits would be seen if they decided to maintain their prices and let new competitors enter.

As the interest rate (i) is not available to determine which of the two options would suit the company, it should decide not to establish a limit price.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In this chapter's Headline, we learned that Tom Jackson benefits by announcing well in advance his new marketing plan to target businesses. Suppose you are an executive at Morton's, and by lucky happenstance you learn of Tom's plans before he implements them. What plan of action should you take? Explain.

Explain the economic basis for predatory pricing.

Barnacle Industries was awarded a patent over 15 years ago for a unique industrial-strength cleaner that removes barnacles and other particles from the hulls of ships. Thanks to its monopoly position, Barnacle has earned more than \(160 million over the past decade. Its customers-spanning the gamut from cruise lines to freighters-use the product because it reduces their fuel bills. The annual (inverse) demand function for Barnacle's product is given by P=400-.0005 Q, and Barnacle's cost function is given by C(Q)=250 Q. Thanks to subsidies stemming from an energy bill passed by Congress nearly two decades ago, Barnacle does not have any fixed costs: The federal government essentially pays for the plant and capital equipment required to make this energy-saving product. Absent this subsidy, Barnacle's fixed costs would be about \)4 million annually. Knowing that the company's patent will soon expire, Marge, Barnacle's manager, is concerned that entrants will qualify for the subsidy, enter the market, and produce a perfect substitute at an identical cost. With interest rates at 7 percent, Marge is considering a limit-pricing strategy. If you were Marge, what strategy would you pursue? Explain.

Assess whether a firm’s profits can be enhanced by changing the timing of decisions or the order of strategic moves and whether doing so creates first- or second-mover advantages.

Consider the following simultaneous move game:

a. What is the maximum amount player 1 should be willing to pay for the opportunity to move first instead of moving at the same time as player 2? Explain carefully.

b. What is the maximum amount player 2 should be willing to spend to keep player 1 from getting to move first?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free