Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain why government attempts to solve market failures can lead to additional inefficiencies because of “rent-seeking” activities.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The government policies against different problems that lead to market power, benefit a group of entities at the expense of other entities. The worse-off entities from the respective government policy might try to oppose such by spending a considerable amount causing rent-seeking activities.

Step by step solution

01

Rent-Seeking

The term refers to those activities where the party opposing the government policies in terms of their interests pays a lumpsum amount to abort the policy from enactment; this is called rent-seeking activity.

Suppose a politician has a lot of power and thus orders to regulate a monopoly in the market. Regulating infers the activity where the monopoly sells its goods at a perfectly competitive price.

The graph above shows that if the politician successfully enacts the regulation, the monopolist will lose a profit, as denoted by triangle A.So, to stop the enactment, the monopolist will be willing to spend up to amount Awhich is rent-seeking for its profitable purposes. On the other hand, the consumers who were to receive a surplus of A+Bwould be willing to pay the amount A+Bto enact the regulation as they receive public benefits. Since this policy is a public good, the consumers are likely paying less compared to the monopolist to whom the private policy had to spend more. Thus, due to such circumstances, the monopolist usually does not involve in rent-seeking purposes.

Thus, one can understand that such government policies can cause problems of rent-seeking, which further brings inefficiency to the market.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain why government attempts to solve market failures can lead to additional inefficiencies because of “rent-seeking” activities.

Canada's forestry industry (composed mainly of those involved in the lumber industry) directly employs about 370,000 workers and indirectly employs an additional 510,000 people in support services. Forestry products account for nearly 3 percent of Canada's gross domestic product (GDP) and \(14.1\) percent of its exports. Lobbyists for the U.S. lumber and timber producers recently filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) alleging that the Canadian government provided a subsidy to its lumber producers and caused harm to U.S. lumber and timber producers. As a result of these concerns, one U.S. lobbyist proposed the imposition of a 15 percent excise tariff on all Canadian forestry products. Determine the likely impact of the proposed 15 percent excise tariff on the equilibrium price and quantity of lumber exchanged in the United States. Would domestic consumers and producers benefit from the proposed tariff? Explain carefully.

Question: 17. Enrodes is a monopoly provider of residential electricity in a region of northern Michigan. Total demand by its 3 million households is and Enrodes can produce electricity at a constant marginal cost of $4 per megawatt-hour. Consumers in this region of Michigan have recently complained that Enrodes is charging too much for its services. In fact, a few consumers are so upset that they are trying to form a coalition to lobby the local government to regulate the price Enrodes charges. If all the consumers of this region joined the coalition against Enrodes, how much would each consumer be willing to spend to lobby the local government to regulate Enrodes's price? Do you think the consumers will be successful in their efforts? Explain.

Suppose that, prior to the passage of the Truth in Lending Simplification Act and Regulation the demand for consumer loans was given by Qpre-TILSAd=12-100 P (in billions of dollars) and the supply of consumer loans by credit unions and other lending institutions was Qpre-TILSAS=5+100P(in billions of dollars). The TILSA now requires lenders to provide consumers with complete information about the rights and responsibilities of entering into a lending relationship with the institution, and as a result, the demand for loans has increased toQpost-TILSAd=18-100P (in billions of dollars). However, the TILSA also imposed "compliance costs" on lending institutions, and this reduced the supply of consumer loans toQpost-TILSAS=3+100P (in billions of dollars). Based on this information, compare the equilibrium price and quantity of consumer loans before and after the Truth in Lending Simplification Act.

Show why externalities can lead competitive markets to provide socially inefficient quantities of goods and services; explain how government policies, such as the Clean Air Act, can improve resource allocation.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free