Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show why externalities can lead competitive markets to provide socially inefficient quantities of goods and services; explain how government policies, such as the Clean Air Act, can improve resource allocation.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Negative externalities can increase both internal and external costs to be borne both by industries and by the entities who are suffering, resulting in market failure. The imposition of the Clean Air Act would eventually reduce the external cost borne by the entities, thus bringing public welfare.

Step by step solution

01

Negative Externality

It is caused when a firm’s production process threatens the economy or the economic entities. Such might result in the bearing of both internal and external costs, thus leading to inefficient allocation of resources, causing market failure. For example, a pipe manufacturer has three chimneys through which high toxic gases are diffused into the air, which causes air pollution, resulting in external costs borne by the people nearby to reduce the impact of such toxic gases.

One can show the market failure in the below diagram:

The figure shows that due to internal and external costs, there is a reduction of output and an increase in price borne by the firm resulting in the shift of resources from the equilibrium, thus causing inefficiency and, in turn, market failure.

02

Clean Air Act

The Act thus imposed by the government covers all industries producing more than 10 tons of pollutants. These acts generally indicate the process where the industries have to buy permits to pollute the environment. Moreover, this Act also includes regulating pollutants through proper installations of such inputs that reduce the pollution, which is also to be checked within a regular interval of time. Moreover, such an act, in turn, had posed an increased cost on both fixed and variable terms which in turn reduces the output of the firm.

From the diagram above, one can understand that the enactment of such policies decreased the firms' production and increased the price of the products. However, it has successfully decreased pollution, thus improving public welfare. Moreover, the firms being able to sell the permits to other firms can induce them to innovate to provide a less pollution strategy to reduce the pollution caused by the firm.

Thus, we can conclude that enacting such an act brought proper resource allocation to the economy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Moses Inc. is a small electric company that provides power to customers in a small rural area in the Southwest. The company is currently maximizing its profits by selling electricity to consumers at a price of \(0.15 per kilowatt-hour. Its marginal cost is \)0.05 per kilowatt-hour, and its average cost is \(0.15 per kilowatt hour. A government regulator is considering a proposal to regulate the firm's price at \)0.05 per kilowatt-hour. Would such a policy improve social welfare? Explain.

You are the manager in a market composed of eight firms, each of which has a 12.5 percent market share. In addition, each firm has a strong financial position and is located within a 100 -mile radius of its competitors.

a. Calculate the premerger Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) for this market.

b. Suppose that any two of these firms merge. What is the postmerger HHI?

c. Based only on the information contained in this question and on the Horizontal Merger Guidelines described in this chapter, do you think the Justice Department (or FTC) would attempt to block a merger between any two of the firms? Explain.

Question: Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 , as amended in 1990 , requires that the officers, directors, and principal shareholders of companies disclose the extent of their ownership of equity securities of the company and any changes in the ownership. Section 16(b) permits companies to recover trading profits realized by such people arising from short-swing transactions in the company securities. Do you think that, as a result of these laws, the government will be forced to spend more money on its auditing and enforcement efforts? Explain.

As the manager of a monopoly, you face potential government regulation. Your inverse demand is P = 40 -2Q, and your costs are C(Q) = 8Q

a. Determine the monopoly price and output.

b. Determine the socially efficient price and output.

c. What is the maximum amount your firm should be willing to spend on lobbying efforts to prevent the price from being regulated at the socially optimal level?

Explain why market power reduces social welfare and identify two types of government policies aimed at reducing deadweight loss.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free