Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that, prior to the passage of the Truth in Lending Simplification Act and Regulation the demand for consumer loans was given by Qpre-TILSAd=12-100 P (in billions of dollars) and the supply of consumer loans by credit unions and other lending institutions was Qpre-TILSAS=5+100P(in billions of dollars). The TILSA now requires lenders to provide consumers with complete information about the rights and responsibilities of entering into a lending relationship with the institution, and as a result, the demand for loans has increased toQpost-TILSAd=18-100P (in billions of dollars). However, the TILSA also imposed "compliance costs" on lending institutions, and this reduced the supply of consumer loans toQpost-TILSAS=3+100P (in billions of dollars). Based on this information, compare the equilibrium price and quantity of consumer loans before and after the Truth in Lending Simplification Act.

Short Answer

Expert verified

We can clearly see that the Truth in Lending Simplification Act led to an Increase In both equilibrium price and quantity.

Ppre-TILSA<Ppost-TILSA0.035<0.075Qpre-TILSA<Qpost-TILSA8.5<10.5

Step by step solution

01

To find the equilibrium quantity before the truth in lending simplification

To establish the equilibrium price and quantity, we must find at which point is the supplied quantity equal to the demanded quantity.

Qpre-TILSAd=Qpre-TILSAS12100P=5+100P200P=7Ppre-TILSA=0.035

Ppre-TILSA=0.035Q=12100×0.035Qpre-TILSA=8.5

Thus, equilibrium quantity before the Truth in Lending Simplification Act was 8.5 loans for the price of $35 million.

02

To find the equilibrium quantity after the truth in lending simplification

To find post-TILSA equilibrium we will use the same formula as in the previous step but now with different functions of supply and demand.

Qpost-TILSAd=Qpost-TILSAS18100P=3+100=200P=15Ppost-TILSA=0.075Q=18100×0.075Qpost-TILSA=10.5

Thus, equilibrium quantity after the Truth in Lending Simplification Act was 10.5 loans for the price of $75 million.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain why government attempts to solve market failures can lead to additional inefficiencies because of “rent-seeking” activities.

Explain why market power reduces social welfare and identify two types of government policies aimed at reducing deadweight loss.

Question:12. Between 1972 and 1981 , Texaco sold gasoline to independent Texaco retailers at "retail tank wagon prices" but granted substantial discounts to distributors Gull and Dompier. Gull resold the gas under its own name. Dompier resold the gas under the Texaco brand name to retail stations and entered the retailmarket directly. Since neither Gull nor Dompier had significant storage facilities, both distributors picked up gas directly from the Texaco plant and delivered it to their retail outlets. As a result, the sales volume increased substantially at the retail stations purchasing gas from these distributors, while independent Texaco retailers suffered a corresponding sales decline. In 1976, independent Texaco retailers filed suit against Texaco. In 1990, the Supreme Court of the United States found that Texaco had indeed violated antitrust law. Which law do you think Texaco was found guilty of violating?

Question:13. Social Dynamo Corporation earned profits last year of \(49 million on sales of \)500 million. During the same period, its major competitor-EIO Corp. - enjoyed sales of \(490 million and earned profits of \)\$ 52\( million. Currently, Social Dynamo is negotiating a deal in which it would acquire the assets of EIO in a transaction Wall Street values at \)120 million. A successful merger between the two companies is expected to raise prices in the market by 2 percent. Is Social Dynamo obligated to notify the U.S. Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission of its merger intentions? Explain.

Explain why incomplete information compromises the efficiency of markets, and identify five government policies aimed at mitigating these problems.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free