Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Referring to the situation in P9-2 for Garcia Home Improvement Company, consider the following expanded data at May 31, 2017. Assume Garcia uses LIFO inventory costing. Problems 483 Replacement Sales Net Realizable Normal Cost Cost Price Value Profi t Aluminum siding \( 70,000 \) 62,500 \( 64,000 \) 56,000 \( 5,100 Cedar shake siding 86,000 79,400 94,000 84,800 7,400 Louvered glass doors 112,000 124,000 186,400 168,300 18,500 Thermal windows 140,000 126,000 154,800 140,000 15,400 Total \)408,000 \(391,900 \)499,200 \(449,100 \)46,400 Instructions (a) (1) Determine the proper balance in Allowance to Reduce Inventory to Market at May 31, 2017. (2) For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2017, determine the amount of the gain or loss that would be recorded due to the change in Allowance to Reduce Inventory to Market. (b) Explain the rationale for the use of the lower-of-cost-or-market rule as it applies to inventories

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a1) The proper balance equals $34,600.

(a2) The loss to be recorded equals $7,100.

(b) Under the Lower-of-cost-or-market method, inventories are recorded at the lowest of cost and market value to report inventory value correctly in the financial statements. And to report loss or gain incurred due to an increase or reduction in the inventory value.

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of Lower-of-cost-or-market

Lower-of-cost-or-market is calculated as follows:

Cost

Replacement Cost

Net Realizable Value

Normal Profit

Net Realizable value less Normal Profit

Designated Market Value

Lower-of-Cost-or-Market

Aluminium siding

$70,000

$62,500

$56,000

$5,100

$50,900

$56,000

$56,000

Cedar shake siding

86,000

79,400

84,800

7,400

77,400

79,400

79,400

Louvered glass doors

112,000

124,000

168,300

18,500

149,800

149,800

112,000

Thermal windows

140,000

126,000

140,000

15,400

124,600

126,000

126,000

Total

$408,000

$373,400

02

Calculation of proper balance in allowance

(a1) Proper balance in allowance is calculated as follows:

ProperBalanceinAllowance=Cost-Lower-of-Cost-or-Market=$408,000-$373,400=$34,600

03

Calculation of loss to be recorded due to change in allowance

(a2) Loss due to change in the allowance is calculated as follows:

LosstobeRecorded=ProperAllowanceBalance-AllowanceBalance=$34,600-$27,500=$7,100

04

Rationale of Lower-of-cost-or-market

In case the future utility of the inventory is below the original cost of the inventory. Then, in this case, the loss is recorded by the business.

In this case, the expense recognition principle is followed as an expense related to a decline in the value of inventory is recorded in the year in which loss is incurred. As the future utility of inventory reduces, inventories are recorded per the market value, not at the original costs, which is against the cost principle.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prophet Company signed a long-term purchase contract to buy timber from the U.S. Forest Service at \(300 per thousand board feet. Under these terms, Prophet must cut and pay \)6,000,000 for this timber during the next year. Currently, the market value is \(250 per thousand board feet. At this rate, the market price is \)5,000,000. Jerry Herman, the controller, wants to recognize the loss in value on the year-end financial statements, but the financial vice president, Billie Hands, argues that the loss is temporary and should be ignored. Herman notes that market value has remained near $250 for many months, and he sees no sign of significant change. Instructions (a) What are the ethical issues, if any? (b) Is any particular stakeholder harmed by the financial vice presidentโ€™s decision? (c) What should the controller do?

On April 15, 2018, fire damaged the office and warehouse of Stanislaw Corporation. The only accounting record saved was the general ledger, from which the balance sheet data below was prepared. STANISLAW CORPORATION MARCH 31, 2018 Dr. Cr. Cash \( 20,000 Accounts receivable 40,000 Inventory, December 31, 2017 75,000 Land 35,000 Buildings 110,000 Accumulated depreciation \) 41,300 Equipment 3,600 Accounts payable 23,700 Other accrued expenses 10,200 Common stock 100,000 Retained earnings 52,000 Sales revenue 135,000 Purchases 52,000 Miscellaneous expense 26,600 . \(362,200 \)362,200The following data and information have been gathered. 1. The fiscal year of the corporation ends on December 31. 2. An examination of the April bank statement and canceled checks revealed that checks written during the period April 1โ€“15 totaled \(13,000: \)5,700 paid to accounts payable as of March 31, \(3,400 for April merchandise shipments, and \)3,900 paid for other expenses. Deposits during the same period amounted to \(12,950, which consisted of receipts on account from customers with the exception of a \)950 refund from a vendor for merchandise returned in April. 3. Correspondence with suppliers revealed unrecorded obligations at April 15 of \(15,600 for April merchandise shipments, including \)2,300 for shipments in transit (f.o.b. shipping point) on that date. 4. Customers acknowledged indebtedness of \(46,000 at April 15, 2018. It was also estimated that customers owed another \)8,000 that will never be acknowledged or recovered. Of the acknowledged indebtedness, \(600 will probably be uncollectible. 5. The companies insuring the inventory agreed that the corporationโ€™s fire-loss claim should be based on the assumption that the overall gross profit rate for the past 2 years was in effect during the current year. The corporationโ€™s audited financial statements disclosed this information: Year Ended December 31 2017 2016 Net sales \)530,000 \(390,000 Net purchases 280,000 235,000 Beginning inventory 50,000 66,000 Ending inventory 75,000 50,000 6. Inventory with a cost of \)7,000 was salvaged and sold for $3,500. The balance of the inventory was a total loss. Instructions Prepare a schedule computing the amount of inventory fire loss. The supporting schedule of the computation of the gross profit should be in good form.

Starfish Company (a company using GAAP and the LIFO inventory method) is considering changing to IFRS and the FIFO inventory method. How would a comparison of these methods affect Starfishโ€™s financials? (a) During a period of inflation, working capital would decrease when IFRS and the FIFO inventory method are used as compared to GAAP and LIFO. (b) During a period of inflation, the taxes will decrease when IFRS and the FIFO inventory method are used as compared to GAAP and LIFO. During a period of inflation, net income would be greater if IFRS and the FIFO inventory method are used as compared to GAAP and LIFO. (d) During a period of inflation, the current ratio would decrease when IFRS and the FIFO inventory methodare used as compared to GAAP and LIFO.

Question:Distinguish between gross profit as a percentage of cost and gross profit as a percentage of sales price. Convert the following gross profit percentages based on cost togross profit percentages based on sales price: 25% and 331 /3%. Convert the following gross profit percentages based on sales price to gross profit percentages based on cost: 331 /3% and 60%.

Robots, Inc. Robots, Inc. reported the following information regarding 2016โ€“2017 inventory. Robots, Inc. 2017 2016 Current assets Cash \( 153,010 \) 538,489 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of \(46,000 in 2017 and \)160,000 in 2016 1,627,980 2,596,291 Inventories (Note 2) 1,340,494 1,734,873 Other current assets 123,388 90,592 Assets of discontinued operations โ€” 32,815 Total current assets 3,244,872 4,993,060 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1 (in part): Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies Inventoriesโ€”Inventories are stated at the lower-of-cost-or-market. Cost is determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Note 2: Inventories consist of the following. 2017 2016 Raw materials \(1,264,646 \)2,321,178 Work in process 240,988 171,222 Finished goods and display units 129,406 711,252 Total inventories 1,635,040 3,203,652 Less: Amount classified as long-term 294,546 1,468,779 Current portion \(1,340,494 \)1,734,873 Inventories are stated at the lower of cost determined by the LIFO method or market for Robots, Inc. If the FIFO method had been used for the entire consolidated group, inventories after an adjustment to the lower-of-cost-ormarket would have been approximately \(2,000,000 and \)3,800,000 at October 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Inventory has been written down to estimated net realizable value, and results of operations for 2017, 2016, and 2015 include a corresponding charge of approximately \(868,000, \)960,000, and \(273,000, respectively, which represents the excess of LIFO cost over market. Inventory of \)294,546 and \(1,468,779 at October 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, shown on the balance sheet as a noncurrent asset represents that portion of the inventory that is not expected to be sold currently. Reduction in inventory quantities during the years ended October 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 resulted in liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at a lower cost prevailing in prior years as compared with the cost of fiscal 2014 purchases. The effect of these reductions was to decrease the net loss by approximately \)24,000, \(157,000, and \)90,000 at October 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Instructions (a) Comment on why Robots, Inc., might disclose how its LIFO inventories would be valued under FIFO. (b) Why does the LIFO liquidation reduce operating costs? (c) Comment on whether Robots, Inc. would report more or less income if it had been on a FIFO basis for all its inventory

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free