Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Dover Company began operations in 2017 and determined its ending inventory at cost and at LCNRV at December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018. This information is presented below. Cost Net Realizable Value 12/31/17 \(346,000 \)322,000 12/31/18 410,000 390,000 Instructions (a) Prepare the journal entries required at December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018, assuming inventory is recorded at LCNRV and a perpetual inventory system using the cost-of-goods-sold method. (b) Prepare journal entries required at December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018, assuming inventory is recorded at LCNRV and a perpetual system using the loss method. (c) Which of the two methods above provides the higher net income in each year?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Under the cost of goods sold method, the cost of goods sold account will be debited, and the inventory account will be credited by $24,000 in 2017. In 2018, the amount will be $20,000.
  2. Under the loss method in 2017, loss due to market decline of inventory is debited, and Allowance to reduce inventory to market is credited by $24,000. In 2018, Allowance to reduce inventory to market will be debited, and Recovery of loss due to market decline of inventory is credited by $4,000.
  3. In the year 2018, net income will be higher in both methods.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate decline in the value of inventory in 2017 in 2018

Inventory at cost equals $346,000, and inventory’s net realizable value is $322,000. Per LCNRV, inventory value will be equal to $322,000, as it is the lowest between the two.

Declineininventory=inventorycost-inventoryasperLCNRV=$346,000-$322,000=$24,000

Inventory at cost equals $410,000, and inventory’s net realizable value is $390,000. Per LCNRV, inventory value will be equal to $390,000, as it is the lowest between the two.

Declineininventory=inventorycost-inventoryasperLCNRV=$410,000-$390,000=$20,000

02

Journal entries in both years using cost of goods sold method

  1. Journal entries for both years are as follows:

Date

Accounts

Debit

Credit

12/31/17

Cost of goods sold

$24,000

Inventory

$24,000

12/31/18

Cost of goods sold

$20,000

Inventory

$20,000

03

Journal entries in both years using loss method

  1. Journal entries for both years are as follows:

Date

Accounts

Debit

Credit

12/31/17

Loss due to market decline of inventory

$24,000

Allowance to reduce inventory to market

$24,000

12/31/18

Allowance to reduce inventory to market

$4,000

Recovery of loss due to market decline of inventory

$4,000

04

Calculation of loss recovery in 2018

Loss recovery in 2018 is calculated as follows:

Lossrecoveryin2018=Declinein2017-Declinein2018=$24,000-$20,000=$4,000

05

Effect on net income

(C) In 2017, ending inventory will be recorded at a reduced value of $24,000, which will increase the cost of goods sold, and, overall, will decrease the net income in 2017.

In 2018, ending inventory will be recorded at a reduced value of $20,000, which will decrease the cost of goods sold, and, overall, will increase the net income in 2018 compared to 2017. This effect is applied to both methods.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fiedler Co. follows the practice of valuing its inventory at the lower-ofcost-or-market. The following information is available from the company’s inventory records as of December 31, 2017. Item Quantity Unit Cost Replacement Cost/Unit Estimated Selling Price/Unit Completion & Disposal Cost/Unit Normal Profit Margin/Unit A 1,100 \(7.50 \)8.40 \(10.50 \)1.50 $1.80 B 800 8.20 7.90 9.40 0.90 1.20 C 1,000 5.60 5.40 7.20 1.15 0.60 D 1,000 3.80 4.20 6.30 0.80 1.50 E 1,400 6.40 6.30 6.70 0.70 1.00Instructions Greg Forda is an accounting clerk in the accounting department of Fiedler Co., and he cannot understand why the market value keeps changing from replacement cost to net realizable value to something that he cannot even figure out. Greg is very confused, and he is the one who records inventory purchases and calculates ending inventory. You are the manager of the department and an accountant. (a) Calculate the lower-of-cost-or-market using the individual-item approach. (b) Show the journal entry he will need to make in order to write down the ending inventory from cost to market. (c) Write a memo to Greg explaining what designated market value is as well as how it is computed. Use your calculations to aid in your explanation

Accounting, Analysis, and Principles Englehart Company sells two types of pumps. One is large and is for commercial use. The other is smaller and is used in residential swimming pools. The following inventory data is available for the month of March. Units Price per Unit Total Residential Pumps Inventory at Feb. 28: 200 \( 400 \) 80,000 Purchases: March 10 500 \( 450 \)225,000 March 20 400 \( 475 \)190,000 March 30 300 \( 500 \)150,000 Sales: March 15 500 \( 540 \)270,000 March 25 400 \( 570 \)228,000 Inventory at March 31: 500 Commercial Pumps Inventory at Feb. 28: 600 \( 800 \)480,000 Purchases: March 3 600 \( 900 \)540,000 March 12 300 \( 950 \)285,000 March 21 500 \(1,000 \)500,000 Sales: March 18 900 \(1,080 \)972,000 March 29 600 \(1,140 \)684,000 Inventory at March 31: 500 In addition to the above information, due to a downturn in the economy that has hit Englehart’s commercial customers especially hard, Englehart expects commercial pump prices from March 31 onward to be considerably different (and lower) than at the beginning of and during March. Englehart has developed the following additional information. Commercial Pumps Residential Pumps Net realizable value (per unit) \(900 \)580 The normal profit margin is 16.67% of cost. Englehart uses the FIFO accounting method. Accounting (a) Determine the dollar amount that Englehart should report on its March 31 balance sheet for inventory. Assume Englehart applies lower-of-cost-or-net realizable value at the individual product level. (b) Repeat part (a) but assume Englehart applies lower-of-cost-or-net realizable value at the major categories level. Englehart places both commercial and residential pumps into the same (and only) category. Analysis Which of the two approaches above (individual product level or major categories) for applying LCNRV do you think gives the financial statement reader better information? Principles Assume that during April, the net realizable value of commercial pumps rebounds to $1,050. (a) Briefly describe how Englehart will report in its April financial statements the inventory remaining from March 31. (b) Briefly describe the conceptual trade-offs inherent in the accounting in part (a).

Presented below is information related to Langston Hughes Corporation. Price LIFO Index Cost Retail Inventory on December 31, 2017, when dollar-value LIFO is adopted 100 \(36,000 \) 74,500 Inventory, December 31, 2018 110 ? 100,100 Instructions Compute the ending inventory under the dollar-value LIFO method at December 31, 2018. The cost-to-retail ratio for 2018 was 60%.

Question:What approaches may be employed in applying the LCNRV procedure? Which approach is normally used and why?

(LCNRV—Error Effect) LaGreca Company uses the LCNRV method, on an individual-item basis, in pricing its inventory items. The inventory at December 31, 2017, included product X. Relevant per-unit data for product X are as follows. Estimated selling price \(50 Cost 40 Estimated selling costs 14 Normal profi t 9 There were 1,000 units of product X on hand at December 31, 2017. Product X was incorrectly valued at \)38 per unit for reporting purposes. All 1,000 units were sold in 2018. Instructions Compute the effect of this error on net income for 2017 and the effect on net income for 2018, and indicate the direction of the misstatement for each year.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free