Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Corrs Company began operations in 2016 and determined its ending inventory at cost and at lower-of-LIFO cost-or-market at December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2017. This information is presented below. Cost Lower-of-Cost-or-Market 12/31/16 \(356,000 \)327,000 12/31/17 420,000 395,000 Instructions (a) Prepare the journal entries required at December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2017, assuming that the inventory is recorded at market, and a perpetual inventory system (cost-of-goods-sold method) is used. (b) Prepare journal entries required at December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2017, assuming that the inventory is recorded at market under a perpetual system (loss method is used). (c) Which of the two methods above provides the higher net income in each year?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Cost of goods sold account debited and inventory account credited by $29,000 respectively in 2017. In 2018, amount will be $29,000.

(b) Loss due to market decline of inventory is debited and Allowance to reduce inventory to market is credited by $25,000. In 2018, Allowance to reduce inventory to market will be debited and Recovery of loss due to market decline of inventory is credited by $4,000.

(c) Both the method will have higher net income in year 2017.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate reduction in the value of inventory in 2016 and 2017

Reduction in value of inventory in 2016 is calculated as follows:

Reductionininventory=Inventoryatcost-Inventoryasperlowerofcostormarket=$356,000-$327,000=$29,000

Reduction in value of inventory in 2017 is calculated as follows:

Reductionininventory=Inventoryatcost-Inventoryasperlowerofcostormarket=$420,000-$395,000=$25,000

02

Journal entries in both year using cost of goods sold method

(a) Journal entries for both years are as follows:

Date

Accounts

Debit

Credit

12/31/16

Cost of goods sold

$29,000

Inventory

$29,000

12/31/17

Cost of goods sold

$25,000

Inventory

$25,000

03

Journal entries in both year using loss method

(b) Journal entries for both years are as follows:

Date

Accounts

Debit

Credit

12/31/16

Loss due to market decline of inventory

$29,000

Allowance to reduce inventory to market

$29,000

12/31/17

Allowance to reduce inventory to market

$4,000

Recovery of loss due to market decline of inventory

$4,000

04

Calculation of loss recovery in 2017

Loss recovery in 2017 is calculated as follows:

Lossrecoveryin2017=Reductionin2016-Declinein2017=$29,000-$25,000=$4,000

05

Effect on net income

(c) In 2016, ending inventory wasrecorded at $327,000 which is higher than the actual cost of $356,000, hence it will increase the cost of goods sold and will decrease the net income. This scenario is applicable to both the methods.

In year 2017, beginning inventory equals $327,000 and ending inventory equals $395,000, which will decrease the cost of goods sold, and will overall result in increased net income. This effect is applicable on both methods.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume that Darcy Industries had the following inventory values. Inventory cost (on December 31, 2017) \(1,500 Inventory market (on December 31, 2017) \)1,350 Inventory net realizable value (on December 31, 2017) \(1,320 Under IFRS, what is the inventory carrying value on December 31, 2017? (a) \)1,500. (b) \(1,570. (c) \)1,560. (d) $1,320

Robots, Inc. Robots, Inc. reported the following information regarding 2016โ€“2017 inventory. Robots, Inc. 2017 2016 Current assets Cash \( 153,010 \) 538,489 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of \(46,000 in 2017 and \)160,000 in 2016 1,627,980 2,596,291 Inventories (Note 2) 1,340,494 1,734,873 Other current assets 123,388 90,592 Assets of discontinued operations โ€” 32,815 Total current assets 3,244,872 4,993,060 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1 (in part): Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies Inventoriesโ€”Inventories are stated at the lower-of-cost-or-market. Cost is determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Note 2: Inventories consist of the following. 2017 2016 Raw materials \(1,264,646 \)2,321,178 Work in process 240,988 171,222 Finished goods and display units 129,406 711,252 Total inventories 1,635,040 3,203,652 Less: Amount classified as long-term 294,546 1,468,779 Current portion \(1,340,494 \)1,734,873 Inventories are stated at the lower of cost determined by the LIFO method or market for Robots, Inc. If the FIFO method had been used for the entire consolidated group, inventories after an adjustment to the lower-of-cost-ormarket would have been approximately \(2,000,000 and \)3,800,000 at October 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Inventory has been written down to estimated net realizable value, and results of operations for 2017, 2016, and 2015 include a corresponding charge of approximately \(868,000, \)960,000, and \(273,000, respectively, which represents the excess of LIFO cost over market. Inventory of \)294,546 and \(1,468,779 at October 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, shown on the balance sheet as a noncurrent asset represents that portion of the inventory that is not expected to be sold currently. Reduction in inventory quantities during the years ended October 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 resulted in liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at a lower cost prevailing in prior years as compared with the cost of fiscal 2014 purchases. The effect of these reductions was to decrease the net loss by approximately \)24,000, \(157,000, and \)90,000 at October 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Instructions (a) Comment on why Robots, Inc., might disclose how its LIFO inventories would be valued under FIFO. (b) Why does the LIFO liquidation reduce operating costs? (c) Comment on whether Robots, Inc. would report more or less income if it had been on a FIFO basis for all its inventory

Dover Company began operations in 2017 and determined its ending inventory at cost and at LCNRV at December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018. This information is presented below. Cost Net Realizable Value 12/31/17 \(346,000 \)322,000 12/31/18 410,000 390,000Prepare the journal entries required at December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018, assuming that the inventory is recorded at LCNRV and a perpetual inventory system using the cost-of-goods-sold method is used. (b) Prepare journal entries required at December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018, assuming that the inventory is recorded at cost and a perpetual system using the loss method is used. (c) Which of the two methods above provides the higher net income in each year?

Dover Company began operations in 2017 and determined its ending inventory at cost and at LCNRV at December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018. This information is presented below. Cost Net Realizable Value 12/31/17 \(346,000 \)322,000 12/31/18 410,000 390,000 Instructions (a) Prepare the journal entries required at December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018, assuming inventory is recorded at LCNRV and a perpetual inventory system using the cost-of-goods-sold method. (b) Prepare journal entries required at December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018, assuming inventory is recorded at LCNRV and a perpetual system using the loss method. (c) Which of the two methods above provides the higher net income in each year?

Referring to the inventory data for Sedato Company in E9-3, assume that Sedato follows the practice of pricing its inventory at the lower-of-cost-or-market, on an individual-item basis. Item No. Quantity Cost per Unit Cost to Replace Estimated Selling Price Cost of Completion and Disposal Normal Profi t 1320 1,200 \(3.20 \)3.00 \(4.50 \)0.35 $1.25 1333 900 2.70 2.30 3.50 0.50 0.50 1426 800 4.50 3.70 5.00 0.40 1.00 1437 1,000 3.60 3.10 3.20 0.25 0.90 1510 700 2.25 2.00 3.25 0.80 0.60 1522 500 3.00 2.70 3.80 0.40 0.50 1573 3,000 1.80 1.60 2.50 0.75 0.50 1626 1,000 4.70 5.20 6.00 0.50 1.00 Instructions From the information above, determine the amount of Sedato Company inventory

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free