Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question: Your classmate Kate believes that the equity method is applied with a strict application of the “20%” rule. Do you agree? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer:

No, because some reason might affect the strict application of the 20% rule.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of 20% rule 

The equity method of the 20% rule states that the voting right of share more than 20% has a significant influence on investee.

02

Reasons for strict application of 20% rule

The reason that affects the strict application of the 20% rule:

  1. Where ownership includes many small groups of shareholders, then the significant influence opposes by these groups of the shareholders.
  2. Where the investor holding 20% or more shares fail to influence the board of directors, then the strict application opposes.
  3. Where the company rejects the holding of the 20% or more share of an investor

Hence, these are why the 20% rule cannot be strictly applied under the equity method.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Indicate how unrealized holding gains and losses should be reported for debt investments classified as trading, available-for-sale, and held-to-maturity.

Margaret Avery Company from time to time embarks on a research program when a special project seems to offer possibilities. In 2015, the company expends \(325,000 on a research project, but by the end of 2015, it is impossible to determine whether any benefit will be derived from it.

  1. What account should be charged for the \)325,000, and how should it be shown in the financial statements?
  2. The project is completed in 2016, and a successful patent is obtained. The R&D costs to complete the project are \(130,000 (\)36,000 of these costs were incurred after achieving economic viability). The administrative and legal expenses incurred in obtaining patent number 472-1001-84 in 2016 total \(24,000. The patent has an expected useful life of 5 years. Record these costs in the journal entry form. Also, record patent amortization (full year) in 2016.
  3. In 2017, the company successfully defends the patent in extended litigation at a cost of \)47,200, thereby extending the patent life to December 31, 2024. What is the proper way to account for this cost? Also, record patent amortization (full year) in 2017.
  4. Additional engineering and consulting costs incurred in 2017 required to advance the design of a new version of the product to the manufacturing stage total $60,000. These costs enhance the design of the product considerably, but it is highly uncertain if there will be a market for the new version of the product. Discuss the proper accounting treatment for this cost.

Waters Corporation purchased Johnson Company 3 years ago and at that time recorded goodwill of \(400,000. The Johnson Division’s net assets, including the goodwill, have a carrying amount of \)800,000. The recoverable amount of the division is estimated to be $1,000,000. Prepare Waters’ journal entry, if necessary, to record an impairment of the goodwill.

Question: Nieland Industries had one patent recorded on its books as of January 1, 2017. This patent had a book value of \(288,000 and a remaining useful life of 8 years. During 2017, Nieland incurred research and development costs of \)96,000 and brought a patent infringement suit against a competitor. On December 1, 2017, Nieland received the good news that its patent was valid and that its competitor could not use the process Nieland had patented. The company incurred $85,000 to defend this patent. At what amount should patent(s) be reported on the December 31, 2017, balance sheet, assuming monthly amortization of patents?

Explain why reclassification adjustments are necessary.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free