Chapter 4: Q4-3IFRS (page 198)
Bradshaw Company experienced a loss that was deemed to be both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence. How should Bradshaw report this item in accordance with IFRS?
Under IFRS, extraordinary items should be reported separately.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Question: Below is the Retained Earnings account for the year 2017 for Acadian Corp.
Retained earnings, January 1, 2017 \(257,600
Add:
Gain on sale of investments (net of tax) \)41,200
Net income 84,500
Refund on litigation with government, related to
the year 2014 (net of tax) 21,600
Recognition of income earned in 2016, but omitted
from income statement in that year (net of tax) 25,400 172,700
430,300
Deduct:
Loss on discontinued operations (net of tax) 35,000
Write-off of goodwill (net of tax) 60,000
Cumulative effect on income of prior years in changing
from LIFO to FIFO inventory valuation in 2017 (net of tax) 23,200
Cash dividends declared 32,000 150,200
Retained earnings, December 31, 2017 $280,100
Instructions
(b) State where the items that do not appear in the corrected retained earnings statement should be shown
Perlman Land Development, Inc. purchased land for \(70,000 and spent \)30,000 developing it. It then sold the land for \(160,000. Sheehan Manufacturing purchased land for a future plant site for \)100,000. Due to a change in plans, Sheehan later sold the land for \(160,000. Should these two companies report the land sales, both at gains of \)60,000, in a similar manner?
Which of the following statements is correct regarding income reporting under IFRS?
(a) IFRS does not permit revaluation of property, plant, equipment, and intangible assets.
(b) IFRS provides the same options for reporting comprehensive income as GAAP.
(c) Companies must classify expenses by nature.
(d) IFRS provides a definition for all items presented in the income statement.
The following information was taken from the records of Roland Carlson Inc. for the year 2017: income tax applicable to income from continuing operations \(187,000, income tax applicable to loss on discontinued operations \)25,500, and unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities (net of tax) \(15,000.
Gain on sale of equipment \)95,000 Cash dividends declared $150,000
Loss on discontinued operations75,000 Retained earnings January1,2017 600,000
Administrative expenses 240,000 Cost of goods sold 850,000
Rent revenue 40,000 Selling expenses 300,000
Loss on write-down of inventory 60,000 Sales revenue 1,900,000
Shares outstanding during 2017 were 100,000.
Instructions
Vandross Company has recorded bad debt expense in the past at a rate of 1½% of accounts receivable, based on an aging analysis. In 2017, Vandross decided to increase its estimate to 2%. If the new rate had been used in prior years, cumulative bad debt expense would have been \(380,000 instead of \)285,000. In 2017, bad debt expense will be \(120,000 instead of \)90,000. If Vandross’s tax rate is 30%, what amount should it report as the cumulative effect of changing the estimated bad debt rate?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.
