Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As a loan analyst for Utrillo Bank, you have been presented with the following information.

Toulouse Co.

Lautrec Co.

Assets

Cash

\(120,000

\) 320,000

Receivables

220,000

302,000

Inventories

570,000

518,000

Total current assets

910,000

1,140,000

Other assets

500,000

612,000

Total assets

\(1,410,000

\)1,752,000

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Current liabilities

\( 305,000

\) 350,000

Long-term liabilities

400,000

500,000

Capital stock and retained earnings

705,000

902,000

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

\(1,410,000

\)1,752,000

Annual sales

\(930,000

\)1,500,000

Rate of gross profit t on sales

30%

40%

Each of these companies has requested a loan of $50,000 for 6 months with no collateral offered. Because your bank has reached its quota for loans of this type, only one of these requests is to be granted.

Instructions

Which of the two companies, as judged by the information given above, would you recommend as the better risk and why? Assume that the ending account balances are representative of the entire year.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Lautrec Co. appears to be a better short-term credit risk than Toulouse Co.

Step by step solution

01

Meaning of Ratio Analysis

Ratio analysis may be a quantitative strategy of picking up knowledge about a company's liquidity, operational proficiency, and productivity by examining its financial statements, such as the balance sheet and income statement.

02

Judging between two companies that can bear risk

Computations are given below, which furnish some basis of comparison of the two companies:

Toulouse Co.

Lautrec Co.

Composition of current assets

Cash

13%

28%

Receivables

24%

27%

Inventories

63%

45%

100

100

Computation of various ratios

Current ratio

2.8:1

3.26:1

Acid-test ratio

1.11:1

1.78:1

Accounts receivable turnover

4.23 times

4.97 times

Inventory turnover

1.14 times

1.74 times

Cash to current liabilities

0.39:1

0.91:1

Working Notes:

Computation of Current ratio of Toulouse Co.

Currentratio=CurrentassetsCurrentliabilities=$910,000$305,000=2.8:1

Computation of Current ratio of Lautrec Co.

Currentratio=CurrentassetsCurrentliabilities=$1,140,000$350,000=3.26:1

Computation of acid-test ratio of Toulouse Co.

Acidtestratio=Cash+receivablesCurrentliabilities=$120,000+$220,000$305,000=$340,000$305,000=1.11:1

Computation of acid-test ratio of Lautrec Co.

Acidtestratio=Cash+receivablesCurrentliabilities=$320,000+$302,000$305,000=$622,000$350,000=1.78:1

Computation of accounts receivable turnover of Toulouse Co.

Accountreceivableturnover=AnnualsalesCurrentliabilities=$930,000$305,000=4.23times

Computation of accounts receivable turnover of Lautrec Co.

Accountreceivableturnover=AnnualsalesCurrentliabilities=$1,500,000$350,000=4.97times

Computation of accounts inventory turnover of Toulouse Co.

Inventoryturnover=Annualsales×UnitsellingpriceInventories=$930,000×0.70$570,000=1.14times

Computation of accounts inventory turnover of Lautrec Co.

Inventoryturnover=Annualsales×UnitsellingpriceInventories=$1,500,000×0.60$518,000=1.74times

Computation of cash to current liabilities of Toulouse Co.

Cashtocurrentliabilities=CashCurrentliabilities=$120,000$305,000=0.39:1

Computation of cash to current liabilities of Lautrec Co.

Cashtocurrentliabilities=CashCurrentliabilities=$320,000$350,000=0.91:1


Investigation of different liquidity ratios illustrates that Lautrec Co. is more grounded financially, all other variables being equal, within the short term. The comparative risk may well be judged superior in the event that extra information was accessible relating to such things as net income, the reason for the loan, the due date of current and long-term liabilities, future prospects, etc.


Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Ratio Computations and Additional Analysis) Bradburn Corporation was formed 5 years ago through a public subscription of common stock. Daniel Brown, who owns 15% of the common stock, was one of the organizers of Bradburn and is its current president. The company has been successful, but it currently is experiencing a shortage of funds. On June 10, 2018, Daniel Brown approached the Topeka National Bank, asking for a 24-month extension on two \(35,000 notes, which are due on June 30, 2018, and September 30, 2018. Another note of \)6,000 is due on March 31, 2019, but he expects no difficulty in paying this note on its due date. Brown explained that Bradburn’s cash flow problems are due primarily to the company’s desire to finance a \(300,000 plant expansion over the next 2 fiscal years through internally generated funds. The commercial loan officer of Topeka National Bank requested the following financial reports for the last 2 fiscal years

BRADBURN CORPORATION

BALANCE SHEET

MARCH 31

Assets

2018

2017

Cash

\) 18,200

\( 12,500

Notes receivable

148,000

132,000

Accounts receivable (net)

131,800

125,500

Inventories (at cost)

105,000

50,000

Plant & Equipment (net of depreciation)

1,449,000

1,420,500

Total assets

\)1,852,000

\(1,740,500

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Accounts payable

\) 79,000

\( 91,000

Notes payable

76,000

61,500

Accrued liabilities

9,000

6,000

Common stock (130,000 shares, \)10 par)

1,300,000

1,300,000

Retained earnings*

388,000

282,000

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

\(1,852,000

\)1,740,500

*Cash dividends were paid at the rate of \(1 per share in the fiscal year 2017 and \)2 per share in the fiscal year 2018.

BRADBURN CORPORATION

INCOME STATEMENT

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31

2018

2017

Sales revenue

\(3,000,000

\)2,700,000

Cost of goods sold*

1,530,000

1,425,000

Gross margin

1,470,000

1,275,000

Operating expenses

860,000

780,000

Income before income taxes

610,000

495,000

Income taxes (40%)

244,000

198,000

Net income

\( 366,000

\) 297,000

Depreciation charges on the plant and equipment of \(100,000 and \)102,500 for fiscal years ended March 31, 2017, and 2018, respectively, are included in the cost of goods sold.

Instructions

(a).Compute the following items for Bradburn Corporation.

3. Inventory turnover for fiscal year 2018.

Keystone Corporation’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, were authorized for issue on March 10, 2018. The following events took place early in 2018.

  1. On January 10, 10,000 ordinary shares of \(5 par value were issued at \)66 per share.
  2. On March 1, Keystone determined after negotiations with the taxing authorities that income taxes payable for 2017 should be \(1,320,000. At December 31, 2017, income taxes payable were recorded at \)1,100,000.

Instructions

Discuss how the preceding subsequent events should be reflected in the 2017 financial statements.

Interim reporting under IFRS:

(a) is prepared using the discrete approach.

(b) is prepared using a combination of the discrete and integral approach.

(c) requires a complete set of financial statements for each interim period.

(d) permits companies to omit disclosure of material events subsequent to the interim reporting date.

Presently, the profession requires that earnings per share be disclosed on the face of the income statement. What are some disadvantages of reporting ratios on the financial statements?

(Ratio Computations and Additional Analysis) Bradburn Corporation was formed 5 years ago through a public subscription of common stock. Daniel Brown, who owns 15% of the common stock, was one of the organizers of Bradburn and is its current president. The company has been successful, but it currently is experiencing a shortage of funds. On June 10, 2018, Daniel Brown approached the Topeka National Bank, asking for a 24-month extension on two \(35,000 notes, which are due on June 30, 2018, and September 30, 2018. Another note of \)6,000 is due on March 31, 2019, but he expects no difficulty in paying this note on its due date. Brown explained that Bradburn’s cash flow problems are due primarily to the company’s desire to finance a \(300,000 plant expansion over the next 2 fiscal years through internally generated funds. The commercial loan officer of Topeka National Bank requested the following financial reports for the last 2 fiscal years

BRADBURN CORPORATION

BALANCE SHEET

MARCH 31

Assets

2018

2017

Cash

\) 18,200

\( 12,500

Notes receivable

148,000

132,000

Accounts receivable (net)

131,800

125,500

Inventories (at cost)

105,000

50,000

Plant & Equipment (net of depreciation)

1,449,000

1,420,500

Total assets

\)1,852,000

\(1,740,500

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Accounts payable

\) 79,000

\( 91,000

Notes payable

76,000

61,500

Accrued liabilities

9,000

6,000

Common stock (130,000 shares, \)10 par)

1,300,000

1,300,000

Retained earnings*

388,000

282,000

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

\(1,852,000

\)1,740,500

*Cash dividends were paid at the rate of \(1 per share in the fiscal year 2017 and \)2 per share in the fiscal year 2018.

BRADBURN CORPORATION

INCOME STATEMENT

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31

2018

2017

Sales revenue

\(3,000,000

\)2,700,000

Cost of goods sold*

1,530,000

1,425,000

Gross margin

1,470,000

1,275,000

Operating expenses

860,000

780,000

Income before income taxes

610,000

495,000

Income taxes (40%)

244,000

198,000

Net income

\( 366,000

\) 297,000

Depreciation charges on the plant and equipment of \(100,000 and \)102,500 for fiscal years ended March 31, 2017, and 2018, respectively, are included in the cost of goods sold.

c). Assume that the percentage changes experienced in fiscal year 2018 as compared with fiscal year 2017 for sales and cost of goods sold will be repeated in each of the next 2 years. Is Bradburn’s desire to finance the plant expansion from internally generated funds realistic? Discuss.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free