Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Presented below are comments made in the financial press.InstructionsPrepare responses to the requirements in each item.

a) Rep. John Dingell, at one time the ranking Democrat on the House Commerce Committee, threw his support behind the FASB’s controversial derivatives accounting standard and encouraged the FASB to adopt the rule promptly. Indicate why a member of Congress might feel obligated to comment on his proposed FASB standard.

b) In a strongly worded letter to Senator Lauch Faircloth (R-NC) and House Banking Committee Chairman Jim Leach (R-IA), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) cautioned against government intervention in the accounting standard-setting process, warning that it had the potential of jeopardizing U.S. capital markets. Explain how government intervention could possibly affect capital markets adversely.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) Given the financial outcomes of GAAP, it is not astonishing that special interest categories become critical and vocal (some supporting while some opposing) when rules are prepared. The FASB’s derivative accounting declaration is no exception

b) Set up of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) through political method will possibly result in the outcomes such as an absence of coherence that will lead to conflicting applications. Moreover, there are so many substitutes.

Step by step solution

01

Meaning of FASB Standard

The Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) is an unconventional governmental entity for setting up and framing the accounting and financial reporting standards for firms and governmental entities in the United States.

02

Explanation for Statement ‘a’


Regarding the GAAP financial outcomes, it is not shocking that thespecial interest class becomes critical and vocal when standards are being set up.Moreover,they also stated that the proposal might not encourage reasonable risk management events and, in a few cases, could display ambiguous financial information.

As a result, Congress is usually approached to apply pressure on the FASB to alter its pronouncements. In the argument of stock option, the industry was entirely productive in approaching Congress to pressurise the FASB to alter its findings. In the derivative argument, Rep. Richard Baker presented a bill which would pressure the SEC to certify each standard provided by the FASB officially.

03

Explanation for the statement ‘b’


EstablishingGAAP with the political processwillresultin the outcomes such as the absence of disclosure thatdiminishes transparencyand is not broad in scope. In the absence of an independent process, GAAP will be dependent on political agreement. Using generally accepted accounting principles for the S and L firm would have compelled regulators to prohibit the activities of many S&Ls.

Another evidence of the issue of government intervention is displayed in the accounting standards used by a few countries around the globe. Wholeness and transparency of information required by creditors and investors are unavailable to fulfil other purposes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: What might explain the fact that different accounting standard-setters have developed accounting standards that are sometimes quite different in nature?

Differentiate between “financial statements” and “financial reporting.”

Accounting standard-setters use the following process in establishing accounting standards:

  1. Research, exposure draft, discussion paper, standard.
  2. Discussion paper, research, exposure draft, standard.
  3. Research, preliminary views, discussion paper, standard.
  4. Research, discussion paper, exposure draft, standard.

CA1-7 WRITING (Need for GAAP) Some argue that having various organizations establish accounting principles is wasteful and inefficient. Rather than mandating accounting rules, each company could voluntarily disclose the type of information it considered important. In addition, if an investor wants additional information, the investor could contact the company and pay to receive the additional information desired.InstructionsComment on the appropriateness of this viewpoint.

Question: CA1-17 GROUPWORK (GAAP and Economic Consequences) The following letter was sent to the SEC and the FASB by the leaders of the business community.

Dear Sirs:

The FASB has been struggling with accounting for derivatives and hedging for many years. The FASB has now developed, over the last few weeks, a new approach that it proposes to adopt as a final standard. We understand that the

Board intends to adopt this new approach as a final standard without exposing it for public comment and debate, despite the evident complexity of new approach, the speed with which it has been developed and the significant changes to the exposure draft since it was released more than one year ago. Instead, the board plans to allow only a brief review by selected parties, limited to issues of operationality and clarity, and would exclude questions as to the merits of the proposed approach.

As the FASB itself has said throughout this process, its mission does not permit it to consider matters that go beyond accounting and reporting considerations. Accordingly, the FASB may not have adequately considered the wide range of concerns that have been expressed about the derivatives and hedging proposal, including concerns related to the potential impact on the capital markets, the weakening of companies` ability to manage risk, and the adverse control implications of implementing costly and complex new rules imposed at the same time as other major initiatives, including the year 2000 issues and a single European currency. We believe that these crucial issues must be considered, if not by the FASB, then by the Securities and Exchange Commission, other regulatory agencies, or Congress.

We believe it is essential that the FASB solicit all comments in order to identify and address all material issues that may exist before issuing a final standard. We understand the desire to bring this process to a prompt conclusion, but the underlying issues are so important to this nation`s businesses, the customers they serve and the economy as a whole that expediency cannot be the dominant consideration. As a result, we urge the FASB to expose its new proposal for public comment, following the established due process procedures that are essential to acceptance of its standards, and providing sufficient time to affected parties to understand and assess the new approach.

We also urge the SEC to study the comments received in order to assess the impact that these proposed rules may have on the capital markets, on companies` risk management practices, and on management and financial controls. These vital public policy matters deserve consideration as part of the Commission`s oversight responsibilities.

We believe that these steps are essential if the FASB is to produce the best possible accounting standard while minimizing adverse economic effects and maintaining the competitiveness of U.S businesses in the international market

place.

Very truly yours, (this letter was signed by the chairs of 22 of the largest U.S companies.)

Instructions

Answer the following questions.

(a) Explain the "due process" procedures followed by the FASB in developing a financial reporting standard.

(b) What is meant by the term "economic consequences" in accounting standard-setting?

(c) What economic consequences arguments are used in this letter?

(d) What do you believe is the main point of the letter?

(e) Why do you believe a copy of this letter was sent by the business community to influential members of the U.S. Congress?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free