Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Financial Statement Analysis Case

Ragatz, Inc.

Ragatz, Inc., a drug company, reported the following information. The company prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP.

2017 (000)

Current liabilities

\(554,114

Convertible subordinated debts

648,020

Total liabilities

1,228,313

Stockholder’s equity

176,413

Net income

58,333

Analysts attempting to compare Ragatz to drug companies that issue debt with detachable warrants may face a challenge due to differences in accounting for convertible debt.

Instructions

(a) Compute the following ratios for Ragatz, Inc. (Assume that year-end balances approximate annual averages.)

(1) Return on assets.

(2) Return on common stock equity.

(3) Debt to assets ratio.

(b) Briefly discuss the operating performance and financial position of Ragatz. Industry averages for these ratios in 2017 were ROA 3.5%; return on equity 16%; and debt to assets 75%. Based on this analysis, would you make an investment in the company’s 5% convertible bonds? Explain.

(c) Assume you want to compare Ragatz to an IFRS company like Merck (which issues nonconvertible debt with detachable warrants). Assuming that the fair value of the equity component of Ragatz’s convertible bonds is \)150,000, how would you adjust the analysis above to make valid comparisons between Ragatz and Merck?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Financial ratios

Return on assets

4.15%

Return on equity

33.06%

Debt to asset

87.44%

(b) The company is performing well, but the company's financial position is not good.

(c) Financial ratios under IFRS

Return on assets

4.15%

Return on equity

17.87%

Debt to asset

76.76%

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Financial Ratios

The comparison made for financial analysis between the various items reported on the financial statement is known as financial ratios. These ratios are used for making a summarized report on the company’s performance.

02

Calculation of ratios

(1) Return on assets

Returnonassets=NetIncomeTotalAssets×100=$58,333$176,413+$1,228,313×100=$58,333$1,404,726×100=4.15%

(2) Return on common stock equity

Returnonequity=NetIncomeStockholdersequity×100=$58,333$176,413×100=33.06%

(3) Debt to assets ratio

Debttoassetsratio=Total DebtsTotal Assets=$1,228,313$176,413+$1,228,313×100=$1,228,313$1,404,726×100=87.44%

03

Operating performance of the company

  1. According to the industry average return on assets, the business entity is performing well because the actual ratio of the business entity is more than the industry average.

2.The industry average return on common stock equity is 16%, and the actual return on the common stock company is generating equals 33.06%. It means that the company generates more profit for stockholders than industry averages.

3.The company's debt to asset ratio is 87.44%, which is more than the industry average of 75%, which means that the company is not in a good financial position as most of its assets are financed through debt.

Even if the company is performing well, the debt to the asset is very high, reflecting that investing in the company’s bonds is riskier. But the investors might be attracted to the convertible bonds because the return on equity is higher than might increase the price of the shares, and investors can generate gain from such an increase in the prices.

04

Adjustments in the financial ratios

Under IFRS, the convertible bonds' equity and debt components of the convertible bonds are recorded separately. While under GAAP, these are not reported separately; therefore, the equity component of convertible bonds will be reported separately, which will affect the ratios.

2017 (000)

Current liabilities

$554,114

Convertible subordinated debts

($648,020$150,000)

498,020

Total liabilities ($1,228,313$150,000)

1,078,313

Stockholder’s equity

($176,413+$150,000)

326,413

Net income

58,333

(1) Return on assets

Returnonassets=NetIncomeTotalAssets×100=$58,333$176,413+$1,228,313×100=$58,333$1,404,726×100=4.15%

(2) Return on common stock equity

Returnonequity=NetIncomeStockholdersequity×100=$58,333$326,413×100=17.87%

(3) Debt to assets ratio

Debttoassetsratio=Total DebtsTotal Assets=$1,078,313$176,413+$1,228,313×100=$1,078,313$1,404,726×100=76.76%

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Warrants Issued with Bonds and Convertible Bonds) Incurring long-term debt with an arrangement whereby lenders receive an option to buy common stock during all or a portion of the time the debt is outstanding is a frequent corporate financing practice. In some situations, the result is achieved through the issuance of convertible bonds; in others, the debt instruments and the warrants to buy stock are separate.

Instructions

(a) (1) Describe the differences that exist in current accounting for original proceeds of the issuance of convertible bonds and of debt instruments with separate warrants to purchase common stock.

(2) Discuss the underlying rationale for the differences described in (a)(1) above.

(3) Summarize the arguments that have been presented in favor of accounting for convertible bonds in the same manner as accounting for debt with separate warrants.

(b) At the start of the year, Huish Company issued \(18,000,000 of 12% bonds along with detachable warrants to buy 1,200,000 shares of its \)10 par value common stock at \(18 per share. The bonds mature over the next 10 years, starting one year from date of issuance, with annual maturities of \)1,800,000. At the time, Huish had 9,600,000 shares of common stock outstanding. The company received $20,040,000 for the bonds and the warrants. For Huish Company, 12% was a relatively low borrowing rate. If offered alone, at this time, the bonds would have sold in the market at a 22% discount. Prepare the journal entry (or entries) for the issuance of the bonds and warrants for the cash consideration received.

Four years after issue, debentures with a face value of \(1,000,000 and book value of \)960,000 are tendered for conversion into 80,000 shares of common stock immediately after an interest payment date. At that time, the market price of the debentures is 104, and the common stock is selling at \(14 per share (par value \)10). The company records the conversion as follows. Bonds Payable 1,000,000 Discount on Bonds Payable 40,000 Common Stock 800,000 Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par— Common Stock 160,000 Discuss the propriety of this accounting treatment.

Bedard Corporation reported net income of \(300,000 in 2017 and had 200,000 shares of common stock outstanding throughout the year. Also outstanding all year were 45,000 options to purchase common stock at \)10 per share. The average market price of the stock during the year was $15. Compute diluted earnings per share.

McIntyre Corporation issued 2,000 $1,000 bonds at 101. Each bond was issued with one detachable stock warrant. After issuance, the bonds were selling separately at 98. The market price of the warrants without the bonds cannot be determined. Use the incremental method to record the issuance of the bonds and warrants.

(EPS with Convertible Bonds and Preferred Stock) The Simon Corporation issued 10-year, \(5,000,000 par, 7% callable convertible subordinated debentures on January 2, 2017. The bonds have a par value of \)1,000, with interest payable annually. The current conversion ratio is 14:1, and in 2 years it will increase to 18:1. At the date of issue, the bonds were sold at 98. Bond discount is amortized on a straight-line basis. Simon’s effective tax was 35%. Net income in 2017 was $9,500,000, and the company had 2,000,000 shares outstanding during the entire year.

Instructions

(a) Prepare a schedule to compute both basic and diluted earnings per share.

(b) Discuss how the schedule would differ if the security was convertible preferred stock

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free