Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

CA16-6 WRITING (EPS, Antidilution) Brad Dolan, a stockholder of Rhode Corporation, has asked you, the firm’s accountant, to explain why his stock warrants were not included in diluted EPS. In order to explain this situation, you must briefly explain what dilutive securities are, why they are included in the EPS calculation, and why some securities are antidilutive and thus not included in this calculation.

Rhode Corporation earned \(228,000 during the period, when it had an average of 100,000 shares of common stock outstanding. The common stock sold at an average market price of \)25 per share during the period. Also outstanding were 30,000 warrants that could be exercised to purchase one share of common stock at $30 per warrant.

Instructions

Write Mr. Dolan a 1–1.5-page letter explaining why the warrants are not included in the calculation.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Warrants are not included in the earnings per share calculationbecause these are anti-dilutive securities.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Diluted Earnings per Share

The financial metric that calculates the earnings per share, assuming that all investors will convert their convertible debt securities into equity security, is diluted earnings per share.

02

Letter for explaining why warrants are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share

Dear Mr. Dolan

Earnings per share are the metric that will provide information about the profit generated for each common share outstanding. It is calculated using the following formula:

Earningspershare=Netincome-PreferreddividendCommonsharesoutstanding

Some corporations have different varieties of shares outstanding such as convertible bonds, convertible preferred stock, and stock options. Such shares are convertible into common stock and therefore have a dilutive effect on the earnings per share.

Analysts believe that financial statements must provide fair and true information to their users. Therefore, basic EPS calculation includes only common shares outstanding while dilutive EPS calculation includes dilutive securities also. Basic EPS uses only shares outstanding, while dilutive earnings per share assume that all convertible securities are converted into shares.

Some of the securities are anti-dilutive, inflating the value of earnings per share rather than diluting it. Therefore, these securities are excluded from the calculation of earnings per share.

Now taking the above situation:

If 30,000 warrants are exercised at $30, it will not increase the outstanding shares by 30,000; rather, it will dilute the EPS. The company will retire the shares of treasury stock from the proceeds received.

Retiredshares=Outstandingwarrants×ParvalueofwarrantParvalueoftreasurystock=30,000$30$25=36,000

Therefore, the company can repurchase 36,000 shares using the proceeds received from the exercise of warrants. This process will increase the outstanding shares by 30,000 and decrease them by 36,000. Therefore, the total outstanding shares will reduce by 6,000 shares. Due to a reduction in the denominator, earnings per share will increase, and the aim of exercising the warrant will remain unachieved. Therefore, these warrants are anti-dilutive and will not be included in calculating earnings per share.

Regards,

Accountant

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(L04) (EPS: Simple Capital Structure) Ace Company had 200,000 shares of common stock outstanding on December 31, 2018. During the year 2019, the company issued 8,000 shares on May 1 and retired 14,000 shares on October 31. For the year 2019, Ace Company reported net income of \(249,690 after a loss from discontinued operations of \)40,600 (net of tax).

Instructions

What earnings per share data should be reported at the bottom of its income statement?

Explain how convertible securities are determined to be potentially dilutive common shares and how those convertible securities that are not considered to be potentially dilutive common shares enter into the determination of earnings per share data.

Accounting for Restricted Stock) Derrick Company issues 4,000 shares of restricted stock to its CFO, Dane Yaping, on January 1, 2017. The stock has a fair value of \(120,000 on this date. The service period related to this restricted stock is 4 years. Vesting occurs if Yaping stays with the company for 4 years. The par value of the stock is \)5. At December 31, 2018, the fair value of the stock is $145,000.

Instructions

(a) Prepare the journal entries to record the restricted stock on January 1, 2017 (the date of grant), and December 31, 2018.

(b) On March 4, 2019, Yaping leaves the company. Prepare the journal entry (if any) to account for this forfeiture.

IFRS16-3 Norman Co., a fast-growing golf equipment company, uses GAAP. It is considering the issuance of convertible bonds. The bonds mature in 10 years, have a face value of \(400,000, and pay interest annually at a rate of 4%. The equity component of the bond issue has a fair value of \)35,000. Greg Shark is curious as to the difference in accounting for these bonds if the company were to use IFRS.

(a) Prepare the entry to record issuance of the bonds at par under GAAP.

(b) Repeat the requirement for part (a), assuming application of IFRS to the bond issuance.

(c) Which approach provides the better accounting? Explain.

Financial Statement Analysis Case

Ragatz, Inc.

Ragatz, Inc., a drug company, reported the following information. The company prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP.

2017 (000)

Current liabilities

\(554,114

Convertible subordinated debts

648,020

Total liabilities

1,228,313

Stockholder’s equity

176,413

Net income

58,333

Analysts attempting to compare Ragatz to drug companies that issue debt with detachable warrants may face a challenge due to differences in accounting for convertible debt.

Instructions

(a) Compute the following ratios for Ragatz, Inc. (Assume that year-end balances approximate annual averages.)

(1) Return on assets.

(2) Return on common stock equity.

(3) Debt to assets ratio.

(b) Briefly discuss the operating performance and financial position of Ragatz. Industry averages for these ratios in 2017 were ROA 3.5%; return on equity 16%; and debt to assets 75%. Based on this analysis, would you make an investment in the company’s 5% convertible bonds? Explain.

(c) Assume you want to compare Ragatz to an IFRS company like Merck (which issues nonconvertible debt with detachable warrants). Assuming that the fair value of the equity component of Ragatz’s convertible bonds is \)150,000, how would you adjust the analysis above to make valid comparisons between Ragatz and Merck?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free