Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Describe cost depletion and percentage depletion. Why is the percentage depletion method permitted?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Percentage depletion has arisen, in part, from the difficulty of valuing the natural resource or determining the discovery value of the asset and of determining the recoverable units.

Step by step solution

01

Step-by-Step SolutionStep 1: Meaning of Depletion

Depletion is defined as a reduction in the quantity of a production factor due to the manufacturing process. Companies generate new products by combining current goods and services. When old items are turned into new products, it is termed a production process.

02

Explaining the cost depletion and percentage depletion

The process of methodically charging the capitalized costs of a natural resource to operations, less residual land values, is known as cost depletion. The goal of this process is to match the resource's cost to its income. The conventional approach for calculating a depletion fee for each unit removed is to divide the total cost less residual value by the projected number of recovered units. An adjustment to the unit fee will be required if the estimate of recovered units changes.

Proportion depletion is a process permitted by the Internal Revenue Code that involves allocating a particular percentage of gross income to operations in order to arrive at taxable income. Because it is unrelated to the asset's cost and is allowed even when the property is fully depleted under cost depletion accounting, percentage depletion is not considered a universally recognized accounting principle. For practically all natural resources, applicable rates ranging from 5% to 22% of total revenue are indicated.

The difficulty of evaluating the natural resource or estimating the discovery value of the item, as well as calculating the recoverable units, has contributed to percentage depletion. Although there have been various reasons for preserving percentage depletion, one of the most compelling is its utility in driving the hunt for new resources. Providing an incentive for the continued search for natural resources is judged to be in the national interest. Percentage depletion is no longer authorized for many businesses, as stated in the textbook.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A building that was purchased on December 31, 2003, for $2,500,000 was originally estimated to have a life of 50 years with no salvage value at the end of that time. Depreciation has been recorded through 2017. During 2018, an examination of the building by an engineering firm discloses that its estimated useful life is 15 years after 2017. What should be the amount of depreciation for 2018?

(Depreciation Computationโ€”Addition, Change in Estimate) In 1990, Herman Moore Company completed the construction of a building at a cost of \(2,000,000 and first occupied it in January 1991. It was estimated that the building will have a useful life of 40 years and a salvage value of \)60,000 at the end of that time.

Early in 2001, an addition to the building was constructed at a cost of \(500,000. At that time, it was estimated that the remaining life of the building would be, as originally estimated, an additional 30 years and that the addition would have a life of 30 years and a salvage value of \)20,000.

In 2019, it is determined that the probable life of the building and addition will extend to the end of 2050, or 20 years beyond the original estimate.

Instructions

  1. Using the straight-line method, compute the annual depreciation that would have been charged from 1991 through 2000.
  2. Compute the annual depreciation that would have been charged from 2001 through 2018.
  3. Prepare the entry, if necessary, to adjust the account balances because of the revision of the estimated life in 2019.
  4. Compute the annual depreciation to be charged, beginning with 2019.

(Depreciation Computationโ€”Replacement, Nonmonetary Exchange) George Zidek Corporation bought a machine on June 1, 2015, for \(31,000, f.o.b. the place of manufacture. Freight to the point where it was set up was \)200, and \(500 was expended to install it. The machineโ€™s useful life was estimated at 10 years, with a salvage value of \)2,500. On June 1, 2016, an essential part of the machine is replaced, at a cost of \(1,980, with one designed to reduce the cost of operating the machine. The cost of the old part and related depreciation cannot be determined with any accuracy.

On June 1, 2019, the company buys a new machine of greater capacity for \)35,000, delivered, trading in the old machine which has a fair value and trade-in allowance of \(20,000. To prepare the old machine for removal from the plant cost \)75, and expenditures to install the new one were \(1,500. It is estimated that the new machine has a useful life of 10 years, with a salvage value of \)4,000 at the end of that time. (The exchange has commercial substance.)

Instructions

Assuming that depreciation is to be computed on the straight-line basis, compute the annual depreciation on the new equipment that should be provided for the fiscal year beginning June 1, 2019. (Round to the nearest dollar.)

(Depletion Computationsโ€”Timber) Stanislaw Timber Company owns 9,000 acres of timberland purchased in 2006 at a cost of \(1,400 per acre. At the time of purchase, the land without the timber was valued at \)400 per acre. In 2007, Stanislaw built fire lanes and roads, with a life of 30 years, at a cost of \(84,000. Every year, Stanislaw sprays to prevent disease at a cost of \)3,000 per year and spends \(7,000 to maintain the fire lanes and roads. During 2008, Stanislaw selectively logged and sold 700,000 board feet of timber of the estimated 3,500,000 board feet. In 2009, Stanislaw planted new seedlings to replace the trees cut at a cost of \)100,000.

Instructions

  1. Determine the depreciation expense and the cost of timber sold related to depletion for 2008.
  2. Stanislaw has not logged since 2008. If Stanislaw logged and sold 900,000 board feet of timber in 2019, when the timber cruise (appraiser) estimated 5,000,000 board feet, determine the cost of timber sold related to depletion for 2019.

Identify the factors that are relevant in determining the annual depreciation charge, and explain whether these factors are determined objectively or whether they are based on judgment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free