Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Kobayashi Corporation reports in the current liability section of its statement of financial position at December 31, 2017 (its year-end), short-term obligations of \(15,000,000, which includes the current portion of 12% long-term debt in the amount of \)10,000,000 (matures in March 2018). Management has stated its intention to refinance the 12% debt whereby no portion of it will mature during 2018. The date of issuance of the financial statements is March 25, 2018.Instructions

(a) Is management’s intent enough to support long-term classification of the obligation in this situation?

(b)Assume that Kobayashi Corporation issues \(13,000,000 of 10-year debentures to the public in January 2018 and that management intends to use the proceeds to liquidate the \)10,000,000 debt maturing in March 2018. Furthermore, assume that the debt maturing in March 2018 is paid from these proceeds prior to the authorization to issue the financial statements. Will this have any impact on the financial position classification at December 31, 2017? Explain your answer.

(c) Assume that Kobayashi Corporation issues ordinary shares to the public in January and that management intends to entirely liquidate the \(10,000,000 debt maturing in March 2018 with the proceeds of this equity securities issue. In light of these events, should the \)10,000,000 debt maturing in March 2018 be included in current liabilities at December 31, 2017?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) No, the management’s intention is not enough to support the long-term classification of the obligation in this situation.

(b) No, the events specified will not affect the financial statements. As Kobayashi Corporation refinancing the long-term obligation matures in March 2018, it does not meet the criteria set out in IFRS that debt should include in the current liabilities.

(c) Yes, the obligation should include in current liabilities.

Step by step solution

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

  • Unlimited AI interaction
  • Study offline
  • Say goodbye to ads
  • Export flashcards

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

01

Meaning of Financial Statements

Financial statements are annual statements of assets and liabilities and income and expenditure. Financial statements areprepared by all the forms of business organizations to ascertain the operating results of the business and to know the financial positionon a particular date.

02

Explanation for statement ‘a’

No, IFRS states that refinancing a short-term debt on a long-term basis also needs that a firm has an unrestricted right to delay settlement of the liability for a minimum period of twelve months after the listing date.

03

Explanation for statement ‘b’

No, the situations specified will not affect the financial statements. Because Kobayashi Corporation’s refinancing of the long-term liability is maturing in March 2018, it does not meet the criteria outlined in IFRS that debt should include in the current liabilities. The $10,000,000 should continue to categorize as the current liability of December 31, 2017. A short-term liability shall not have in current liabilities if the firm’s intention to refinance the short-term debt on a long-term basis is assisted by an unconditional right to delay the settlement of the debt for a minimum of twelve months after the listing date.

04

Explanation for statement ‘c’

Yes, the obligation should include in current liabilities. The issuance of ordinary shares in January does not meet the conditions required to have an unconditional right to delay the settlement of the debt for a minimum period of twelve months after the listing date.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Where can authoritative IFRS be found related to investments?

Presented below are two independent cases related to available-for-sale debt investments.

Case 1 Case 2

Amortized cost \(40,000 \)100,000

Fair value 30,000 110,000

Expected credit losses 25,000 92,000

For each case, determine the amount of impairment loss, if any

(Debt Investments) Presented below is information from a bond investment amortization schedule with

related fair values provided. These bonds are classified as available-for-sale.

12/31/17 12/31/18 12/31/19

Amortized cost \(491,150 \)519,442 \(550,000

Fair value 497,000 509,000 550,000

Instructions

(a) Indicate whether the bonds were purchased at a discount or a premium.

(b) Prepare the adjusting entry to record the bonds at fair value on December 31, 2017. The Fair Value Adjustment account

has a debit balance of \)1,000 before adjustment.

(c) Prepare the adjusting entry to record the bonds at fair value on December 31, 2018.

(Fair Value and Equity Methods) Brooks Corp. is a medium-sized corporation specializing in quarrying stonefor building construction. The company has long dominated the market, at one time achieving a 70% market penetration. Duringprosperous years, the company’s profits, coupled with a conservative dividend policy, resulted in funds available for outside

investment. Over the years, Brooks has had a policy of investing idle cash in equity securities. In particular, Brooks has made periodicinvestments in the company’s principal supplier, Norton Industries. Although the firm currently owns 12% of the outstandingcommon stock of Norton Industries, Brooks does not have significant influence over the operations of Norton Industries.

Cheryl Thomas has recently joined Brooks as assistant controller, and her first assignment is to prepare the 2017 year-endadjusting entries for the accounts that are valued by the “fair value” rule for financial reporting purposes. Thomas has gatheredthe following information about Brooks’ pertinent accounts.

1. Brooks has equity securities related to Delaney Motors and Patrick Electric. During 2017, Brooks purchased 100,000 shares of

Delaney Motors for \(1,400,000; these shares currently have a fair value of \)1,600,000. Brooks’ investment in Patrick Electrichas not been profitable; the company acquired 50,000 shares of Patrick in April 2017 at \(20 per share, a purchase that currentlyhas a value of \)720,000.

2. Prior to 2017, Brooks invested \(22,500,000 in Norton Industries and has not changed its holdings this year. This investmentin Norton Industries was valued at \)21,500,000 on December 31, 2016. Brooks’ 12% ownership of Norton Industries has acurrent fair value of \(22,225,000 on December 2017.

Instructions

(a) Prepare the appropriate adjusting entries for Brooks as of December 31, 2017, to reflect the application of the “fairvalue” rule for the securities described above.

(b) For the securities presented above, describe how the results of the valuation adjustments made in (a) would be reflectedin the body of Brooks’ 2017 financial statements.

(c) Prepare the entries for the Norton investment, assuming that Brooks owns 25% of Norton’s shares. Norton reportedincome of \)500,000 in 2017 and paid cash dividends of $100,000.

What are compensated absences?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free