Logout Open In App
Open In App
Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Chapter 7: Question IFRS7-1 (page 385)

What are some steps taken by both the FASB and IASB to move to fair value measurement for financial instruments? In what ways have some of the approaches differed?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Thesplit model is introduced for stating business entities to report financial instruments at their fair value. There is a difference between recording the impairment losses and gains under IASB and FASB.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of IASB

The board responsible for developing the regulations in international financial statement reporting is IASB (International Accounting Standard Board).

02

Steps Taken by FASB and IASB for Fair Value Measurement

Both IASB and FASB state that the financial instruments must be recorded on their fair value because it increases the financial statements' understandability and transparency. All other financial assets must be reported at their amortized cost when the financial asset meets some specified criteria.

03

Difference in Approaches

The difference that exists between the approaches of IASB and FASB is the accounting for impairment of the financial instruments. Under the IASB approach, the allowance is estimated for a shorter future than FASB.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Under IFRS:

(a) the entry to record estimated uncollected accounts is the same as GAAP.

(b) loans and receivables should only be tested for impairment as a group.

(c) it is always acceptable to use the direct write-off method.

(d) all financial instruments are recorded at fair value.

(Note Transactions at Unrealistic Interest Rates) On July 1, 2017, Agincourt Inc. made two sales.

1. It sold land having a fair value of \(700,000 in exchange for a 4-year zero-interest-bearing promissory note in the face amount of \)1,101,460. The land is carried on Agincourt’s books at a cost of \(590,000.

2. It rendered services in exchange for a 3%, 8-year promissory note having a face value of \)400,000 (interest payable annually).

Agincourt Inc. recently had to pay 8% interest for money that it borrowed from British National Bank. The customers in these two transactions have credit ratings that require them to borrow money at 12% interest.

Instructions

Record the two journal entries that should be recorded by Agincourt Inc. for the sales transactions above that took place on July 1, 2017.

Simms Company has significant amounts of trade accounts receivable. Simms uses the allowance method to estimate bad debts instead of the direct write-off method. During the year, some specific accounts were written off as uncollectible, and some that were previously written off as uncollectible were collected.

Instructions

(a) What are the deficiencies of the direct write-off method?

(b) Briefly describe the allowance method to estimate bad debts and the theoretical justification for its use?

(c) How should Simms account for the collection of the specific accounts previously written off as uncollectible?

Which of the following statements is true?

(a) The fair value option requires that some types of financial instruments be recorded at fair value.

(b) The fair value option requires that all noncurrent financial instruments be recorded at amortized cost.

(c) The fair value option allows, but does not require, that some types of financial instruments be recorded at fair value.

(d) The FASB and IASB would like to reduce the reliance on fair value accounting for financial instruments in the future.

Because of calamitous earthquake losses, Bernstein Company, one of your client’s oldest and largest customers, suddenly and unexpectedly became bankrupt. Approximately 30% of your client’s total sales have been made to Bernstein Company during each of the past several years. The amount due from Bernstein Company— none of which is collectible—equals 22% of total accounts receivable, an amount that is considerably in excess of what was determined to be an adequate provision for doubtful accounts at the close of the preceding year. How would your client record the write-off of the Bernstein Company receivable if it is using the allowance method of accounting for bad debts? Justify your suggested treatment.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

Organizational Behavior

Read Explanation

Business Case Studies

Read Explanation

Human Resources

Read Explanation

Nature of Business

Read Explanation

Intermediate Accounting

Read Explanation

Strategic Analysis

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free