Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Corrs Wholesalers Co. sells industrial equipment for a standard 3-year note receivable. Revenue is recognized at time of sale. Each note is secured by a lien on the equipment and has a face amount equal to the equipment’s list price. Each note’s stated interest rate is below the customer’s market rate at date of sale. All notes are to be collected in three equal annual installments beginning one year after sale. Some of the notes are subsequently sold to a bank with recourse, some are subsequently sold without recourse, and some are retained by Corrs. At year end, Corrs evaluates all outstanding notes receivable and provides for estimated losses arising from defaults.

Instructions

At December 31, 2017, how should Corrs measure and account for the impact of estimated losses resulting from notes receivable that it

(1) Retained and did not sell?

(2) Sold to bank with recourse?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Bad debt expenses must be recognized using the aging method when the business entity retains receivables. When receivables are sold using resource liability, it will increase the loss of the business entity because it is reported on the credit side.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Equipment

Equipment can be defined as the resource or any tool used by the business entity in the production process or essential business function. It is reported as a fixed asset of the business.

02

Measure and Accounting for Estimated Loss

1. For notes receivable not sold: In this case, the business entity will recognize bad debt expenses by using the aging method or discounted cash flow. The amount of bad debt expenses equals the difference of allowance for doubtful accounts and the amount recovered from the equipment.

2. Sold to bank with the resource: In this case, the business entity will report resource liability on the credit side. The liability will be used to measure the bad debts at the time of sale of receivable and increase the loss for the business entity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Milner Family Importers sold goods to Tung Decorators for \(30,000 on November 1, 2017, accepting Tung’s \)30,000, 6-month, 6% note. Prepare Milner’s November 1 entry, December 31 annual adjusting entry, and May 1 entry for the collection of the note and interest.

Finman Company designated Jill Holland as petty cash custodian and established a petty cash fund of \(200. The fund is reimbursed when the cash in the fund is at \)15, which it is. Petty cash receipts indicate funds were disbursed for office supplies \(94 and miscellaneous expense \)87. Prepare journal entries for the establishment of the fund and the reimbursement.

On September 30, 2016, Rolen Machinery Co. sold a machine and accepted the customer’s zero-interest-bearing note. Rolen normally makes sales on a cash basis. Since the machine was unique, its sales price was not determinable using Rolen’s normal pricing practices.

After receiving the first of two equal annual installments on September 30, 2017, Rolen immediately sold the note with recourse. On October 9, 2018, Rolen received notice that the note was dishonored, and it paid all amounts due. At all times prior to default, the note was reasonably expected to be paid in full.

Instructions

(c) How should Rolen account for the effects of the note being dishonored?

On July 1, 2017, Moresan Company sold special-order merchandise on credit and received in return an interest-bearing note receivable from the customer. Moresan will receive interest at the prevailing rate for a note of this type. Both the principal and interest are due in one lump sum on June 30, 2018.

On September 1, 2017, Moresan sold special-order merchandise on credit and received in return a zero-interest-bearing note receivable from the customer. The prevailing rate of interest for a note of this type is determinable. The note receivable is due in one lump sum on August 31, 2019.

Moresan also has significant amounts of trade accounts receivable as a result of credit sales to its customers. On October 1, 2017, some trade accounts receivable were assigned to Indigo Finance Company on a non-notification (Moresan handles collections) basis for an advance of 75% of their amount at an interest charge of 8% on the balance outstanding.

On November 1, 2017, other trade accounts receivable were sold without recourse. The factor withheld 5% of the trade accounts receivable factored as protection against sales returns and allowances and charged a finance charge of 3%.

Instructions

How should Moresan account for subsequent collections on the trade accounts receivable assigned on October 1, 2017, and the payments to Indigo Finance? Why?

(Bank Reconciliation and Adjusting Entries) The cash account of Aguilar Co. showed a ledger balance of \(3,969.85 on June 30, 2017. The bank statement as of that date showed a balance of \)4,150. Upon comparing the statement with the cash records, the following facts were determined.

1. There were bank service charges for June of \(25.

2. A bank memo stated that Bao Dai’s note for \)1,200 and interest of \(36 had been collected on June 29, and the bank had made a charge of \)5.50 on the collection. (No entry had been made on Aguilar’s books when Bao Dai’s note was sent to the bank for collection.)

3. Receipts for June 30 for \(3,390 were not deposited until July 2.

4. Checks outstanding on June 30 totaled \)2,136.05.

5. The bank had charged the Aguilar Co.’s account for a customer’s uncollectible check amounting to \(253.20 on June 29.

6. A customer’s check for \)90 (as payment on the customer’s Accounts Receivable) had been entered as \(60 in the cash receipts journal by Aguilar on June 15.

7. Check no. 742 in the amount of \)491 had been entered in the cash journal as \(419, and check no. 747 in the amount of \)58.20 had been entered as $582. Both checks had been issued to pay for purchases and were payments on Aguilar’s Accounts Payable.

Instructions

(a) Prepare a bank reconciliation dated June 30, 2017, proceeding to a correct cash balance.

(b) Prepare any entries necessary to make the books correct and complete.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free