Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Erickson Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan. The corporation’s actuary provides the following information about the plan. January 1, December 31, 2017 2017 Vested benefit obligation \(1,500 \)1,900 Accumulated benefit obligation 1,900 2,730 Projected benefit obligation 2,500 3,300 Plan assets (fair value) 1,700 2,620 Settlement rate and expected rate of return 10% Pension asset/liability 800 ? Service cost for the year 2017 400 Contributions (funding in 2017) 700 Benefits paid in 2017 200 Instructions (a) Compute the actual return on the plan assets in 2017. (b) Compute the amount of the other comprehensive income (G/L) as of December 31, 2017. (Assume the January 1, 2017, balance was zero.) (c) Compute the amount of net gain or loss amortization for 2017 (corridor approach). (d) Compute pension expense for 2017.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The corridor approach is the type of approach an organization opts for to decrease their amount of total gains or lossesso that relevant adjustments can be made to thetotal pension expensefor the year.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Computation of the amount of the other comprehensive income (G/L) as of December 31, 2017

Particulars

Amount

Fair value of plan assets Dec 31, 2017

$2,620

Less: Fair value of plan assets, Jan 1 2017

$1,700

Increase in fair value of plan assets

$920

Less: Contributions

$700

Less: Benefits paid

$200

$500

Actual return on plan assets in 2017

$420

02

(b) Computation of the amount of the other comprehensive income (G/L) as of December 31, 2017

Particulars

Amount

PBO at the end of the year

$3,300

PBO per memo records:

Add: PBO as on 1/1/17

$2,500

Add: Interest @10%

$250

Add: Service cost

$400

Less: Benefits paid

$200

$2,950

Liability loss

$350

Actual fair value of plan assets 12/31/17

$2,620

Less: Expected fair value of plan assets 1/1/17

$1,700

Add: Expected return $1,700×10%

$170

Add: Contributions

$700

Less: Benefits paid

$200

$2,370

Asset gain

$250

Net (Gain) or Loss

($100)

03

(c) Computation of the amount of net gain or loss amortization for 2017 (corridor approach).

The computation of the amount of net gain or loss amortization for the year 2017 is not required. There was no net gain or loss at the beginning of the Erickson Company’s financial year by the question.

04

(d) Computation of pension expense for 2017

Particulars

Amount

Service cost

$400

Add: Interest cost 2,500×10%

$250

Less: Actual return on plan assets$170+$250

$420

Add: Unexpected gain

$250

Pension Expense

$480

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Andrews Company has five employees participating in its defined benefit pension plan. Expected years of future service for these employees at the beginning of 2017 are as follows. Future Employee Years of Service Jim 3 Paul 4 Nancy 5 Dave 6 Kathy 6 On January 1, 2017, the company amended its pension plan, increasing its projected benefit obligation by $72,000. Instructions Compute the amount of prior service cost amortization for the years 2017 through 2022 using the years-of-service method, setting up appropriate schedules.

Davis Corporation is a medium-sized manufacturer of paperboard containers and boxes. The corporation sponsors a noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan that covers its 250 employees. Sid Cole has recently been hired as president of Davis Corporation. While reviewing last year’s financial statements with Carol Dilbeck, controller, Cole expressed confusion about several of the items in the footnote to the financial statements relating to the pension plan. In part, the footnote reads as follows. Note J. The company has a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of its employees. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee’s compensation during the last four years of employment. The company’s funding policy is to contribute annually the maximum amount allowed under the federal tax code. Contributions are intended to provide for benefi ts expected to be earned in the future as well as those earned to date. The net periodic pension expense on Davis Corporation’s comparative income statement was \(72,000 in 2017 and \)57,680 in 2016. The following are selected figures from the plan’s funded status and amounts recognized in the Davis Corporation’s Statement of Financial Position at December 31, 2017 (\(000 omitted). Actuarial present value of benefi t obligations: Accumulated benefi t obligation (including vested benefi ts of \)636) \( (870) Projected benefi t obligation \)(1,200) Plan assets at fair value 1,050 Projected benefi t obligation in excess of plan assets $ (150) Given that Davis Corporation’s work force has been stable for the last 6 years, Cole could not understand the increase in the net periodic pension expense. Dilbeck explained that the net periodic pension expense consists of several elements, some of which may increase or decrease the net expense. Instructions (a) The determination of the net periodic pension expense is a function of five elements. List and briefly describe each of the elements. (b) Describe the major difference and the major similarity between the accumulated benefit obligation and the projected benefit obligation. (c) (1) Explain why pension gains and losses are not recognized on the income statement in the period in which they arise. (2) Briefly describe how pension gains and losses are recognized.

Using the information in E20-2, prepare a pension worksheet inserting January 1, 2017, balances, showing December 31, 2017, balances, and the journal entry recording pension expense.

Differentiate between a defined contribution pension plan and a defined benefit pension plan. Explain how the employer’s obligation differs between the two types of plans.

Hobbs Co. has the following defined benefit pension plan balances on January 1, 2017. Projected benefit obligation \(4,600,000 Fair value of plan assets 4,600,000 The interest (settlement) rate applicable to the plan is 10%. On January 1, 2018, the company amends its pension agreement so that prior service costs of \)600,000 are created. Other data related to the pension plan are: 2017 2018 Service cost \(150,000 \)170,000 Prior service cost amortization –0– 90,000 Contributions (funding) to the plan 200,000 184,658 Benefits paid 220,000 280,000 Actual return on plan assets 252,000 350,000 Expected rate of return on assets 6% 8% Instructions (a) Prepare a pension worksheet for the pension plan in 2017. (b) Prepare any journal entries related to the pension plan that would be needed at December 31, 2017. (c) Prepare a pension worksheet for 2018 and any journal entries related to the pension plan as of December 31, 2018. (d) Indicate the pension-related amounts reported in the 2018 financial statements.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free