Chapter 22: 22-3IFRS (page 1328)
Short Answer
The comparative financial statement can be compared, and the difference between GAAP and IFRS makes it challenging for U.S. companies to adopt IFRS
Chapter 22: 22-3IFRS (page 1328)
The comparative financial statement can be compared, and the difference between GAAP and IFRS makes it challenging for U.S. companies to adopt IFRS
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free(Accounting for Accounting Changes and Errors) Listed below are various types of accounting changes and errors.
______ 1. Change in a plant assetโs salvage value.
______ 2. Change due to overstatement of inventory.
______ 3. Change from sum-of-the-yearsโ-digits to straight-line method of depreciation.
______ 4. Change from presenting unconsolidated to consolidated financial statements.
______ 5. Change from LIFO to FIFO inventory method.
______ 6. Change in the rate used to compute warranty costs.
______ 7. Change from an unacceptable accounting principle to an acceptable accounting principle.
______ 8. Change in a patentโs amortization period.
______ 9. Change from completed-contract to percentage-of-completion method on construction contracts.
______ 10. Change from FIFO to average-cost inventory method.
Instructions For each change or error, indicate how it would be accounted for using the following code letters:
(a) Accounted for prospectively.
(b) Accounted for retrospectively.
(c) Neither of the above.
Lenexa State Bank has followed the practice of capitalizing certain marketing costs and amortizing these costs over their expected life. In the current year, the bank determined that the future benefits from these costs were doubtful. Consequently, the bank adopted the policy of expensing these costs as incurred. How should the bank report this accounting change in the comparative financial statements?
On December 31, 2017, before the books were closed, the management and accountants of Madrasa Inc. made the following determinations about three pieces of equipment.
1. Equipment A was purchased January 2, 2014. It originally cost \(540,000 and, for depreciation purposes, the straight-line method was originally chosen. The asset was originally expected to be useful for 10 years and have a zero salvage value. In 2017, the decision was made to change the depreciation method from straight-line to sum-of-the-yearsโ-digits, and the estimates relating to useful life and salvage value remained unchanged.
2. Equipment B was purchased January 3, 2013. It originally cost \)180,000 and, for depreciation purposes, the straight-line method was chosen. The asset was originally expected to be useful for 15 years and have a zero residual value. In 2017, the decision was made to shorten the total life of this asset to 9 years and to estimate the residual value at \(3,000.
3. Equipment C was purchased January 5, 2013. The assetโs original cost was \)160,000, and this amount was entirely expensed in 2013. This particular asset has a 10-year useful life and no residual value. The straight-line method was chosen for depreciation purposes.
Additional data:
1. Income in 2017 before depreciation expense amounted to \(400,000.
2. Depreciation expense on assets other than A, B, and C totaled \)55,000 in 2017.
3. Income in 2016 was reported at \(370,000.
4. Ignore all income tax effects.
5. 100,000 shares of common stock were outstanding in 2016 and 2017.
Instructions
(a) Prepare all necessary entries in 2017 to record these determinations.
(b) Prepare comparative retained earnings statements for Madrasa Inc. for 2016 and 2017. The company had retained earnings of \)200,000 at December 31, 2015.
(Change in Estimate) Mike Crane is an audit senior of a large public accounting firm who has just been assigned to the Frost Corporationโs annual audit engagement. Frost has been a client of Craneโs firm for many years. Frost is a fastgrowing business in the commercial construction industry. In reviewing the fixed asset ledger, Crane discovered a series of unusual accounting changes, in which the useful lives of assets, depreciated using the straight-line method, were substantially lowered near the midpoint of the original estimate. For example, the useful life of one dump truck was changed from 10 to 6 years during its fifth year of service. Upon further investigation, Mike was told by Kevin James, Frostโs accounting manager, โI donโt really see your problem. After all, itโs perfectly legal to change an accounting estimate. Besides, our CEO likes to see big earnings!โ
Instructions Answer the following questions.
(a) What are the ethical issues concerning Frostโs practice of changing the useful lives of fixed assets?
(b) Who could be harmed by Frostโs unusual accounting changes?
(c) What should Crane do in this situation?
The management of Utrillo Instrument Company had concluded, with the concurrence of its independent auditors, that results of operations would be more fairly presented if Utrillo changed its method of pricing inventory from last-in, first-out (LIFO) to average-cost in 2017. Given below is the 5-year summary of income under LIFO and a schedule of what the inventories would be if stated on the average-cost method.
UTRILLO INSTRUMENT COMPANY STATEMENT OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE YEARS ENDED MAY 31 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Salesโnet \(13,964 \)15,506 \(16,673 \)18,221 \(18,898 Cost of goods sold Beginning inventory 1,000 1,100 1,000 1,115 1,237 Purchases 13,000 13,900 15,000 15,900 17,100 Ending inventory (1,100) (1,000) (1,115) (1,237) (1,369) Total 12,900 14,000 14,885 15,778 16,968 Gross profi t 1,064 1,506 1,788 2,443 1,930 Administrative expenses 700 763 832 907 989 Income before taxes 364 743 956 1,536 941 Income taxes (50%) 182 372 478 768 471 Net income 182 371 478 768 470 Retained earningsโbeginning 1,206 1,388 1,759 2,237 3,005 Retained earningsโending \) 1,388 \( 1,759 \) 2,237 \( 3,005 \) 3,475 Earnings per share \(1.82 \)3.71 \(4.78 \)7.68 \(4.70 SCHEDULE OF INVENTORY BALANCES USING AVERAGE-COST METHOD FOR THE YEARS ENDED MAY 31 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 \)1,010 \(1,124 \)1,101 \(1,270 \)1,500 $1,720
Instructions Prepare comparative statements for the 5 years, assuming that Utrillo changed its method of inventory pricing to average-cost. Indicate the effects on net income and earnings per share for the years involved. Utrillo Instruments started business in 2012. (All amounts except EPS are rounded up to the nearest dollar.)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.