Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Martin, Inc. is a manufacturer of lead crystal glasses. The standard direct materialsquantity is 1.0 pound per glass at a cost of \(0.50 per pound. The actual result for onemonth’s production of 6,500 glasses was 1.2 pounds per glass, at a cost of \)0.30 perpound. Calculate the direct materials cost variance and the direct materials efficiencyvariance.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The direct material cost variance of the company is $1,560(F) and the direct materials efficiency variance of the company is $650(U).

Step by step solution

01

Computation of the direct materials cost variance-

Direct materials cost variance

Actal quantity [6,500 x 1.2] (a)

$7,800

Actual price (b)

$0.30

Standard price (c)

$0.50

Direct materials cost variance [a*(b-c)]

$1,560 (F)

02

Computation of the direct materials efficiency variance-

Direct materials efficiency variance

Standard price (a)

$0.50

Actual quantity [6,500 x1.2] (b)

$7,800

Standard quantity [6,500 x1.0] (c)

$6,500

Direct materials efficiency variance [a*(b-c)]

$650 (U)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

McCarthy Fender, which uses a standard cost system, manufactured 20,000 boat fenders during 2018. The 2018 revenue and cost information for McCarthy follows:

Sales Revenue \( 1,300,000

Cost of Goods Sold (at standard) 196,800

Direct materials cost variance 7,150 F

Direct materials efficiency variance 5,950 U

Direct labor cost variance 400 U

Direct labor efficiency variance 530 F

Variable overhead cost variance 650 U

Variable overhead efficiency variance 360 F

Fixed overhead cost variance 2,350 U

Fixed overhead volume variance 4,410 U

Assume each fender produced was sold for the standard price of \)65, and total selling and administrative costs were $250,000. Prepare a standard cost income statement for 2018 for McCarthy Fender

Download an Excel template for this problem online in MyAccountingLab or at http://www.pearsonhighered.com/Horngren. Pilchuck Company manufactures tote bags and has provided the following information for September 2018:

Units

Actual Results

Static Budget

Static Budget

11,000

12,000

Sales Revenue

\(368,000

\)384,000

Variable Costs

183,000

198,000

Contribution Margin

185,000

186,000

Fixed Costs

76,000

77,184

Operating Income

\(109,000

\)108,816

  1. Requirements
  2. Prepare a flexible budget performance report, including the heading. Use the ABS function when calculating variances, and use the drop-down selections for F or U when describing the variances.
  3. Calculate the Static Budget Variance for operating income, and label it as a F (favorable) or U (unfavorable) variance.

Drew Castello, general manager of Sunflower Manufacturing, was frustrated. He wanted the budgeted results, and his staff was not getting them to him fast enough. Drew decided to pay a visit to the accounting office, where Jeff Hollingsworth was supposed to be working on the reports. Jeff had recently been hired to update the accounting system and speed up the reporting process.

“What’s taking so long?” Drew asked. “When am I going to get the variance reports?” Jeff sighed and attempted to explain the problem. “Some of the variances appear to be way off. We either have a serious problem in production, or there is an error in the spreadsheet. I want to recheck the spreadsheet before I distribute the report.” Drew pulled up a chair, and the two men went through the spreadsheet together. The formulas in the spreadsheet were correct and showed a large unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance. It was time for Drew and Jeff to do some investigating.

After looking at the time records, Jeff pointed out that it was unusual that every employee in the production area recorded exactly eight hours each day in direct labor. Did they not take breaks? Was no one ever five minutes late getting back from lunch? What about clean­up time between jobs or at the end of the day?

Drew began to observe the production laborers and noticed several disturbing items. One employee was routinely late for work, but his time card always showed him clocked in on time. Another employee took 10­ to 15­minute breaks every hour, averaging about 1 hours each day, but still reported eight hours of direct labor each day. Yet another employee often took an extra 30 minutes for lunch, but his time card showed him clocked in on time. No one in the production area ever reported any “down time” when they were not working on a specific job, even though they all took breaks and completed other tasks such as doing clean­up and attending department meetings.

Requirements

1. How might the observed behaviors cause an unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance?

2. How might an employee’s time card show the employee on the job and working when the team member was not present?

3. Why would the employees’ activities be considered fraudulent?

List the eight product variances and the manager most likely responsible for each.

Computing and journalizing standard cost variances

Moss manufactures coffee mugs that it sells to other companies for customizing with their own logos. Moss prepares flexible budgets and uses a standard cost system to control manufacturing costs. The standard unit cost of a coffee mug is based on static budget volume of 59,800 coffee mugs per month:

Direct material (0.2 lbs. @\(0.25 per lb)

\)0.05

Direct Labor (3 minutes @ \(0.11 per minute)

0.33

Manufacturing Overhead:

Variable (3 minutes @ \)0.06 per minute)

\(0.18

Fixed (3 minutes @ \)0.13 per minute)

0.39

0.57

Total Cost per Coffee Mug

\(0.95

Actual cost and production information for July 2018 follows:

a. There were no beginning or ending inventory balances. All expenditures were on account.

b. Actual production and sales were 62,500 coffee mugs.

c. Actual direct materials usage was 11,000 lbs. at an actual cost of \)0.17 per lb.

d. Actual direct labor usage was 197,000 minutes at a total cost of \(25,610.

e. Actual overhead cost was \)10,835 variable and \(29,765 fixed.

f. Selling and administrative costs were \)95,000.

Requirements

1. Compute the cost and efficiency variances for direct materials and direct labor.

2. Journalize the purchase and usage of direct materials and the assignment of direct labor, including the related variances.

3. For manufacturing overhead, compute the variable overhead cost and efficiency variances and the fixed overhead cost and volume variances.

4. Journalize the actual manufacturing overhead and the allocated manufacturing overhead. Journalize the movement of all production costs from Work­-in­-Process Inventory. Journalize the adjusting of the Manufacturing Overhead account.

5. Moss intentionally hired more highly skilled workers during July. How did this decision affect the cost variances? Overall, was the decision wise?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free