Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question:Stella, Inc. is using a costs-of-quality approach to evaluate design engineering efforts for a new skateboard. Stella’s senior managers expect the engineering work to reduce appraisal, internal failure, and external failure activities. The predicted reductions in activities over the two-year life of the skateboards follow. Also shown are the predetermined overhead allocation rates for each activity.

Activity Predicted Predetermined

Reduction in Overhead Allocation

Activity Units Rate per Unit

Inspection of incoming raw materials 390 $ 44

Inspection of finished goods 390 19

Number of defective units discovered in-house 1,200 50

Number of defective units discovered by customers 325 72

Lost profits due to dissatisfied customers 75 102

Requirements

3. What major difficulty would Stella’s managers have in implementing this costs-of-quality approach? What alternative approach could they use to measure quality improvement?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

Different approaches to the COQ model are – PQC, TCOQ, and QFD models as they remove the difficulty of complexities, and are simple to understand and measure quality.

Step by step solution

01

Major difficulty in implementing the cost-of-quality approach

The difficulties in implementing the COQ approach are as follows –

1) Measuring the quality cost is the major difficulty as every cost cannot be measured like profit loss due to unhappiness of customers.

2) Another difficulty in implementing this approach is the lack of knowledge of using this approach efficiently.

3) Another difficulty arises due to the lack of needed tools to collect, organize, filter, and report quality costs.

02

 Step 2: Alternative approaches to COQ

Alternative approaches to COQ are as follows –

1) Poor Quality cost – This is the improved model and ignores the prevention and appraisal costs as they are problematic to measure.

2) Total cost of quality – TCOQ model differs from COQ in the sense that TCOQ does not include maintenance and quality training costs as in the COQ model. Thus it is not a preferred model as that of COQ.

3) Qualified function development – QFD was developed to understand the customer requirements and maximize the quality positively by creating a comprehensive quality system.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question:Stella, Inc. is using a costs-of-quality approach to evaluate design engineering efforts for a new skateboard. Stella’s senior managers expect the engineering work to reduce appraisal, internal failure, and external failure activities. The predicted reductions in activities over the two-year life of the skateboards follow. Also shown are the predetermined overhead allocation rates for each activity.

Activity Predicted Predetermined

Reduction in Overhead Allocation

Activity Units Rate per Unit

Inspection of incoming raw materials 390 \( 44

Inspection of finished goods 390 19

Number of defective units discovered in-house 1,200 50

Number of defective units discovered by customers 325 72

Lost profits due to dissatisfied customers 75 102

Requirements

2. Stella spent \)103,000 on design engineering for the new skateboard. What is the net benefit of this “preventive” quality activity?

The Alexander Manufacturing Company in Rochester, Minnesota, assembles and tests electronic components used in smartphones. Consider the following data regarding component T24 (amounts are per unit):

Direct materials cost \( 81.00

Direct labor cost 21.00

Activity-based costs allocated ?

Total manufacturing product cost ?

The activities required to build the component follow:

Activity

Allocation Base

Cost Allocated to Each Unit

Start Station

Number of raw component chassis

3 X \)1.50 = \(4.50

Dip Insertion

Number of dip insertions

? X 0.50 = 14.50

Manual Insertion

Number of manual insertions

13 X 0.40 = ?

Wave solder

Number of components solders

3 X 1.50 = 4.50

Backload

Number of backload insertions

7 X ? = 2.80

Test

Number of testing hours

0.39 60.0 = ?

Defect analysis

Number of defect analysis hours

0.10 X ? = 4.00

Total activity-based costs

\) ?

Requirements

2. Why might managers favor this ABC system instead of Alexander’s older system, which allocated all manufacturing overhead costs on the basis of direct labor hours?

Refer to Short Exercise S19-8. Spectrum Corp. desires a 25% target gross profit after covering all product costs. Considering the total product costs assigned to the Products C and D in Short Exercise S19-8, what would Spectrum have to charge the customer to achieve that gross profit? Round to two decimal places.

Harcourt Pharmaceuticals manufactures an over-the-counter allergy medication. The company sells both large commercial containers of 1,000 capsules to health care facilities and travel packs of 20 capsules to shops in airports, train stations, and hotels. The following information has been developed to determine if an activity-based costing system would be beneficial:

Activity Estimated Estimated Quantity

Indirect Cost Allocation Base of Allocation Base

Materials handling \( 96,000 Number of kilos 24,000 kilos

Packaging 210,000 Number of machine hours 3,000 hours

Quality assurance 114,000 Number of samples 1,900 samples

Total indirect costs \) 420,000

Other production information includes the following:

Commercial Containers Travel Packs

Units produced 2,800 containers 51,000 packs

Weight in kilos 9,800 5,100

Machine hours 1,960 510

Number of samples 560 765

Requirements

1. Harcourt’s original single plantwide overhead allocation rate system allocated indirect costs to products at $140.00 per machine hour. Compute the total indirect costs allocated to the commercial containers and to the travel packs under the original system. Then compute the indirect cost per unit for each product. Round to two decimal places.

The Oakman Company (see Short Exercise S19-1) has refined its allocation system by separating manufacturing overhead costs into two cost pools—one for each department. The estimated costs for the Mixing Department, \(510,000, will be allocated based on direct labor hours, and the estimated direct labor hours for the year are 170,000. The estimated costs for the Packaging Department, \)300,000, will be allocated based on machine hours, and the estimated machine hours for the year are 40,000. In October, the company incurred 38,000 direct labor hours in the Mixing Department and 10,000 machine hours in the Packaging Department.

Requirements

2. Determine the total amount of overhead allocated in October.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free