Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Koehler (see Exercise E19-15 and Exercise E19-16) makes handheld calculators in two models—basic and professional—and wants to further refine its costing system by allocating overhead using activity-based costing. The estimated \(721,000 of manufacturing overhead has been divided into three primary activities: Materials Handling, Machine Setup, and Insertion of Parts. The following data have been compiled:

Material Handling

Machine Setup

Insertion of Parts

Total

Overhead costs

\) 45,000

\( 136,000

\) 540,000

$ 721,000

Allocation base

Number of parts

Number of setups

Number of parts

Expected usage:

Basic Model

32 parts per calculator

24 setups per year

32 parts per calculator

Professional

Model

58 parts per calculator

44 setups per year

58 parts per calculator

Requirement 1

Koehler expects to produce 200,000 basic models and 200,000 professional models. Compute the predetermined overhead allocation rates using activity-based costing. How much overhead is allocated to the basic model? To the professional model?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Predetermined overhead allocation rate

For material handling: $500 per part

For machine setup: $2,000 per setup

For inspection of parts: $6,000 per part

Overhead cost allocation

Basic Model: $256,000

Professional Model: $465,000

Step by step solution

01

Step-by-Step-SolutionStep 1: Computation of predetermined overhead allocation rate

ForMaterialhandling=TotaloverheadcostformaterialhandlingTotalnumberofparts=$45,00032+58=$45,00090=$500perpart

ForMachinesetup=TotaloverheadcostformachinesetupTotalnumberofsetups=$136,00024+44=$136,00068=$2,000persetup

ForInsertionofparts=TotaloverheadcostforinsertionofpartsTotalnumberofparts=$540,00032+58=$540,00090=$6,000perpart

02

Computation of overhead allocation to Basic Model

Activity costs

Predetermined overhead allocation rate

X

Actual quantity of allocation base

=

Allocated overhead cost

Material handling

$500 per part

X

32 parts

=

$16,000

Machine setup

$2,000 per setup

X

24 setups

=

$48,000

Inspection of parts

$6,000 per part

32 parts

=

$192,000

Total

$256,000

03

Computation of overhead allocation to Professional Model

Activity costs

Predetermined overhead allocation rate

X

Actual quantity of allocation base

=

Allocated overhead cost

Material handling

$500 per part

X

58 parts

=

$29,000

Machine setup

$2,000 per setup

X

44 setups

=

$88,000

Inspection of parts

$6,000 per part

58 parts

=

$348,000

Total

$465,000

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Eason Company manufactures wheel rims. The controller expects the following ABC allocation rates for 2018:

Activity Allocation Base Predetermined Overhead

Allocation Rate

Materials handling Number of parts $ 4.00 per part

Machine setup Number of setups 400.00 per setup

Insertion of parts Number of parts 26.00 per part

Finishing Number of finishing hours 90.00 per hour

Eason produces two wheel rim models: standard and deluxe. Expected data for 2018 are as follows:

Standard Deluxe

Parts per rim 4.0 7.0

Setups per 500 rims 18.0 18.0

Finishing hours per rim 1.0 5.5

Total direct hours per rim 5.0 6.0

The company expects to produce 500 units of each model during the year.

Requirements

1. Compute the total estimated indirect manufacturing cost for 2018.

Refer to Exercise E19-20. For 2019, Eason’s managers have decided to use the same indirect manufacturing costs per wheel rim that they computed in 2018 using activitybasedn costing. In addition to the unit indirect manufacturing costs, the following data are expected for the company’s standard and deluxe models for 2019:

Standard Deluxe

Sales price \( 800.00 \) 940.00

Direct materials 31.00 48.00

Direct labor 45.00 52.00

Because of limited machine hour capacity, Eason can produce either2,000 standard rims or2,000 deluxe rims.

Requirements

3. Which course of action will yield more income for Eason?

Willitte Pharmaceuticals manufactures an over-the-counter allergy medication. The company sells both large commercial containers of 1,000 capsules to health care facilities and travel packs of 20 capsules to shops in airports, train stations, and hotels. The following information has been developed to determine if an activity-based costing system would be beneficial:

Activity Estimated Estimated Quantity

Indirect Cost Allocation Base of Allocation Base

Materials handling \( 95,000 Number of kilos 19,000 kilos

Packaging 200,000 Number of machine hours 5,000 hours

Quality assurance 112,500 Number of samples 1,875 samples

Total indirect costs \) 407,500

Actual production information includes the following:

Commercial Containers Travel Packs

Units produced 2,400 containers 50,000 packs

Weight in kilos 9,600 5,000

Machine hours 1,680 500

Number of samples 240 750

Requirements

4. Compare the indirect activity-based costs per unit to the indirect costs per unit from the traditional system. How have the unit costs changed? Explain why the costs changed.

Why is JIT costing sometimes called backflush costing?

How can ABM be used by service companies?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free