Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A consultant commented that “too often the numbers look good but feel bad.” This comment often stems from estimation error common to capital budgeting proposals that relate to future cash flows. Three reasons for this error often exist. First, reliably predicting cash flows several years into the future is very difficult. Second, the present value of cash flows many years into the future (say, beyond 10 years) is often very small. Third, personal biases and expectations can influence present value computations.

Required

1. Compute the present value of $100 to be received in 10 years assuming a 12% discount rate.

2. Why is understanding the three reasons mentioned for estimation error important when evaluating investment projects? Link this response to your answer for part 1.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The present value of $100 is $32.2 and the three reasons are stated in step 2 of the solution.

Step by step solution

01

Step-by-Step SolutionStep 1: Computation of net present value of $100

PresentValueof$100=Amount×PVfactor=100×0.322=$32.2

02

Understanding the three reasons mentioned for estimation error

The three reasons which are common to capital budgeting proposals that relate to future cash flows are as follows:

1. It seems to be difficult to predict reliable future cash flows

2. The present value of cash flows many years into the future.

3. It is a very difficult task for personal biases and expectations not to influence present value calculations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Lenitnes Company is considering an investment in technology to improve its operations. The investment will require an initial outlay of \(250,000 and will yield the following expected cash flows. Management requires investments to have a payback period of three years, and it requires a 10% return on its investments.

Period Cash Flow

1 . . . . . . . . . . . \)125,000

2 . . . . . . . . . . . 94,000

3 . . . . . . . . . . . 75,000

4 . . . . . . . . . . . 52,000

5 . . . . . . . . . . . 47,000

Required

1. Determine the payback period for this investment. (Round the answer to one decimal.)

2. Determine the break-even time for this investment. (Round the answer to one decimal.)

3. Determine the net present value for this investment.

Analysis Component

4. Should management invest in this project? Explain.

5. Compare your answers for parts 1 through 4 with those for Problem 24-5A. What are the causes of the differences in results and your conclusions?

Howard Co. is considering two alternative investments. The payback period is 3.5 years for Investment A and 4 years for Investment B.

1. If management relies on the payback period, which investment is preferred?

2. Why might Howard’s analysis of these two alternatives lead to the selection of B over A?

Park Co. is considering an investment that requires immediate payment of \(27,000 and provides expected cash inflows of \)9,000 annually for four years. What is the investment’s payback period?

Why is the present value of \(100 that you expect to receive one year from today worth less than \)100 received today? What is the present value of $100 that you expect to receive one year from today, discounted at 12%?

Interstate Manufacturing is considering either replacing one of its old machines with a new machine or having the old machine overhauled. Information about the two alternatives follows. Management requires a 10% rate of return on its investments.

Alternative 1: Keep the old machine and have it overhauled. If the old machine is overhauled, it will be kept for another five years and then sold for its salvage value.

Cost of old machine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \(112,000

Cost of overhaul . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150,000

Annual expected revenues generated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95,000

Annual cash operating costs after overhaul . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,000

Salvage value of old machine in 5 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,000

Alternative 2: Sell the old machine and buy a new one. The new machine is more efficient and will yield substantial operating cost savings with more product being produced and sold.

Cost of new machine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \)300,000

Salvage value of old machine now . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,000

Annual expected revenues generated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,000

Annual cash operating costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,000

Salvage value of new machine in 5 years . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000

Required 1. Determine the net present value of alternative 1.

2. Determine the net present value of alternative 2.

3. Which alternative do you recommend that management select? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free