Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suggest several reasons why a 2:1 current ratio might not be adequate for a particular company

Short Answer

Expert verified

2:1 current ratio shows the defensive style of business operation, low investment for growth and limited opportunity.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of current ratio

The current ratio provides the relation between the current asset and current liabilities, showing the company's capacity to meet the short-term obligations.

02

Reasons why 2:1 is inadequate

There are the following reasons for which 2:1 is inadequate for some companies:

(a) 2:1 current ratio shows that the company invests twice in the current assets compared to current liabilities to avoid the risk of default of payment. This strategy of the business is the defensive strategy.

(b) Investing a high amount in the current assets reduce the level of investment in fixed assets which increases the capacity of the company to produce more and grow more.

(c) Investing twice the amount in current assets than current assets increases the burden on the shareholders to invest more, limiting their investment opportunity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the difference between comparative financial statements and common-size comparative statements?

Selected comparative financial statements of Haroun Company follow.

HAROUN COMPANY

Comparative Income Statements

For Years Ended December 31, 2017โ€“2011

\( thousands 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \)1,694 \(1,496 \)1,370 \(1,264 \)1,186 \(1,110 \)928

Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,246 1,032 902 802 752 710 586

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448 464 468 462 434 400 342

Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . 330 256 234 170 146 144 118

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \( 118 \) 208 \( 234 \) 292 \( 288 \) 256 \(224

HAROUN COMPANY

Comparative Balance Sheets

December 31, 2017โ€“2011

\) thousands 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011

Assets

Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \( 58 \) 78 \( 82 \) 84 \( 88 \) 86 \( 89

Accounts receivable, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490 514 466 360 318 302 216

Merchandise inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,838 1,364 1,204 1,032 936 810 615

Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 32 14 34 28 28 9

Long-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 146 146 146 146

Plant assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,020 2,014 1,752 944 978 860 725

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \)4,442 \(4,002 \)3,518 \(2,600 \)2,494 \(2,232 \)1,800 Liabilities and Equity

Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \(1,220 \)1,042 \( 718 \) 614 \( 546 \) 522 \( 282

Long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,294 1,140 1,112 570 580 620 400

Common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 1,000 1,000 850 850 650 650

Other paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 250 250 170 170 150 150

Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 678 570 438 396 348 290 318

Total liabilities and equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . \)4,442 \(4,002 \)3,518 \(2,600 \)2,494 \(2,232 \)1,800

Required

1. Compute trend percents for all components of both statements using 2011 as the base year. (Round percents to one decimal.)

Selected year-end financial statements of Cabot Corporation follow. (All sales were on credit; selected balance sheet amounts at December 31, 2016, were inventory, \(48,900; total assets, \)189,400; common stock, \(90,000; and retained earnings, \)22,748.)

CABOT CORPORATION

Income Statement

For Year Ended December 31, 2017

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \(448,600

Cost of goods sold . . . . . . 297,250

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . 151,350

Operating expenses . . . . . 98,600

Interest expense . . . . . . . . 4,100

Income before taxes . . . . . 48,650

Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . 19,598

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . \) 29,052

CABOT CORPORATION

Balance Sheet

December 31, 2017

Assets Liabilities and Equity

Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \( 10,000 Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \) 17,500

Short-term investments . . . . . . . . 8,400 Accrued wages payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,200

Accounts receivable, net . . . . . . . 29,200 Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,300

Notes receivable (trade)* . . . . . . . 4,500 Long-term note payable, secured

Merchandise inventory . . . . . . . . . 32,150 by mortgage on plant assets . . . . . . . . 63,400

Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,650 Common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,000

Plant assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153,300 Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62,800

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \(240,200 Total liabilities and equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . \)240,200

* These are short-term notes receivable arising from customer (trade) sales.

Required

Compute the following:

(1) current ratio,

Round to one decimal place; for part 6, round to two decimals.

Common-size and trend percents for Rustynail Companyโ€™s sales, cost of goods sold, and expenses follow. Determine whether net income increased, decreased, or remained unchanged in this three-year period.


Common-Size Percents
Trend Percents

2017
2016
2015
2017
2016
2015
Sales
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
105.4% 1
104.2%
100.0%
Cost of goods sold

63.4

61.9

59.1
113.1

109.1

100.0
Total expenses
15.3
14.8
15.1
106.8
102.1
100.0

For each ratio listed, identify whether the change in ratio value from 2016 to 2017 is usually regarded as favorable or unfavorable.

Ratio

2017

2016

Ratio

2017

2016

1

Profit margin

9%

8%

5

Accounts receivable turnover

5.5

6.7

2

Debt ratio

47%

42%

6

Basic earnings per share

\(1.25

\)1.10

3

Gross margin

34%

46%

7

Inventory turnover

3.6

3.4

4

Acid test ratio

1.00

1.15

8

Dividend yield

2.0%

1.2%

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free