Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Chapter 2: Question 8-22I (page 260)

Good News, Inc., just announced an increase in its annual earnings, yet its stock price fell. Is there a rational explanation for this phenomenon?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The correct answer is “mismatch in announcement with anticipation”.

Step by step solution

01

Definition

The amount of income including income from all heads in a financial year is known as annual earning.

02

Explanation

In the above scenario, it is likely that the market had anticipated much greater earnings from the company than that was announced. This could have led to the disappointment and hence the price fall.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of the following observations would provide evidence against the semi-strong form of the efficient market theory? Explain.

a. Mutual fund managers do not on average make superior returns.

b. You cannot make superior profits by buying (or selling) stocks after the announcement of an abnormal rise in dividends.

c. Low P/E stocks tend to have positive abnormal returns.

d. In any year approximately 50% of pension funds outperform the market.

Two investment advisers are comparing performance. One averaged a 19% return and the other a 16% return. However, the beta of the first adviser was 1.5, while that of the second was 1.

a. Can you tell which adviser was a better selector of individual stocks (aside from the issue of general movements in the market)?

b. If the T-bill rate were 6% and the market return during the period were 14%, which adviser would be the superior stock selector?

c. What if the T-bill rate were 3% and the market return 15%?

Suppose there are two independent economic factors, M 1 and M 2 . The risk-free rate is 7%, and all stocks have independent firm-specific components with a standard deviation of 50%. Portfolios A and B are both well diversified.

What is the expected return–beta relationship in this economy?

Shares of small firms with thinly traded stocks tend to show positive CAPM alphas. Is this a violation of the efficient market hypothesis?

Use the following data in answering CFA Questions:

Investor “satisfaction” with portfolio increases with expected return and decreases with variance according to the “utility” formula: U = E(r) - ½ Aσ2where A = 4.

Question: Based on the formula above, which investment would you select if you were risk neutral?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free